It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: carewemust
He was probably only finding out about it. He tweeted a statement later about it.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Zelun
Good luck defeating it. It has enough power to brute force through any existing jamming system. It's not an easy system to defeat.
originally posted by: Zelun
a reply to: carewemust
good point. Seems like an off-the-cuff response, no?
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: carewemust
He had just returned to the White House when he was asked that. You don't get a full briefing on a situation like this in the car on the way back to the White House. It would have been something along the lines of "there's been a collision with one of our destroyers". After getting back he would have gotten a more detailed briefing.
originally posted by: Zelun
a reply to: carewemust
I don't know how that relates to the OP, I can kind of speculate but I won't. I'm sorry your son was dismissed for trying to do the right thing. That said, there is more to the story. This pilot's conduct wouldn't have reflected upon your son's military bearing. But here I go speculating again.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Zelun
They still have radar though. They might not have full power right away, but they'd be able to make repairs fairly quickly to get full power back to the radar in a war situation.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Zelun
The Porter? The damage to the Porter was on the Starbord side. But what does that have to do with this?
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: roadgravel
Wrong link, other than that ..WTF is going on in the Navy?