It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Mueller’s team of investigators has sent subpoenas in recent weeks from a Washington grand jury to global banks for account information and records of transactions involving Manafort and some of his companies, as well as those of a long-time business partner, Rick Gates, according to people familiar with the matter.
The special counsel has also reached out to other business associates, including Manafort’s son-in-law and a Ukrainian oligarch, according to one of the people. Those efforts were characterized as an apparent attempt to gain information that could be used to squeeze Manafort, or force him to be more helpful to prosecutors.
New York prosecutors have demanded records relating to up to $16 million in loans that a bank run by a former campaign adviser for President Donald Trump made to former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, according to a person familiar with the matter.
The subpoena by the Manhattan district attorney’s office to the Federal Savings Bank, a small Chicago bank run by Steve Calk, sought information on loans the bank issued in November and January to Mr. Manafort and his wife, the person said. The loans were secured by two properties in New York and a condominium in Virginia, real-estate records show.
Asked about the subpoena Monday, Mr. Calk said he had no comment.
A spokesman for Mr. Manafort declined to comment.
Mr. Calk was a member of Mr. Trump’s economic advisory panel who overlapped with Mr. Manafort on the Trump campaign. Messrs. Manafort and Calk knew each other before the campaign, a person familiar with the relationship has said.
The bank’s loans to Mr. Manafort equaled almost 24% of the bank’s reported $67 million of equity capital, according to a federal report. Around the time they were issued, Mr. Calk had expressed interest in becoming Mr. Trump’s Army Secretary, the Journal previously reported, citing three people briefed on the Army interactions.
The inquiry by the U.S. Attorney in Manhattan initially focused on a Manafort-backed business called CMZ Ventures, which sought to develop a luxury skyscraper on Park Avenue in 2008. The partnership received $25 million from Firtash, according to court records filed in a New York federal lawsuit. But the money was never invested in a project, and the firm was shuttered in 2009.
The plaintiffs in that CMZ civil suit, including the former prime minister of Ukraine, Yulia Tymoshenko, alleged the real purpose of the firm was to launder money through the U.S. financial system that Firtash had obtained improperly by skimming sales of natural gas to Ukraine.
In court papers, lawyers for CMZ Ventures and fellow defendants argued that U.S. laws didn’t apply to gas transactions abroad and that the New York court had no jurisdiction in the matter. A federal judge agreed, dismissing the lawsuit in 2015.
Federal investigators are examining financial transactions involving Paul Manafort and his son-in-law, who embarked on a series of real estate deals in recent years fueled by millions of dollars from Mr. Manafort, according to two people familiar with the matter.
The transactions involve the financing of apartments and luxury homes in New York and California using money from Mr. Manafort, as well as from other investors solicited by the son-in-law, Jeffrey Yohai, including the actor Dustin Hoffman and his son. F.B.I. agents have reviewed financial records related to Mr. Yohai, who has been accused in a lawsuit of defrauding investors, the sources said.
Mr. Manafort declined to comment. A lawyer for Mr. Yohai did not respond to a request for comment.
The Summerbreeze loan was part of a series of mortgages over the past year, totaling $20 million, secured by properties belonging to Mr. Manafort or his wife. Some of that money appears to have been used by Mr. Manafort to try to salvage his investments with Mr. Yohai. Court records show that Mr. Manafort and his wife invested at least $4 million in several California properties, part of a real estate business that one of Mr. Manafort’s daughters described as a joint venture between her father and Mr. Yohai.
Former Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort’s son-in-law Jeffrey Yohai just won some precious time in his fight against fraud charges. On Wednesday, a federal judge dismissed an investor’s lawsuit over a technicality.
The plaintiff, New York photographer Guy Aroch, had sued in federal court in November, alleging he invested $2.9 million in Yohai’s real estate projects but never got any money back. Instead, Aroch alleged, Yohai used the money for “personal travel; lavish purchases; and/or speculative ventures outside the investment mandates.”
Yohai filed a motion to dismiss the suit, arguing that because both parties live in New York the matter should be brought to a state court. A judge granted the motion on Wednesday. Aroch’s attorney, who declined to comment, promptly refiled the suit in state court.
originally posted by: UKTruth
Sounds like the Russian collusion narrative is a dry well for the Special Counsel.
Maybe they'll get Manafort on some Indian/Ukranian collusion on a business deal not related to the election?
originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: Anathros
you'd think with the republicans in charge some of that would be looked into, huh?
odd that. maybe no evidence? my opinion anyway.
originally posted by: Dudemo5
originally posted by: UKTruth
Sounds like the Russian collusion narrative is a dry well for the Special Counsel.
Maybe they'll get Manafort on some Indian/Ukranian collusion on a business deal not related to the election?
Funny how you always jump to whatever conclusion you can find that doesn't involve any collusion with Russia. Goofy.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Dudemo5
originally posted by: UKTruth
Sounds like the Russian collusion narrative is a dry well for the Special Counsel.
Maybe they'll get Manafort on some Indian/Ukranian collusion on a business deal not related to the election?
Funny how you always jump to whatever conclusion you can find that doesn't involve any collusion with Russia. Goofy.
The story is about deals with Ukraine and India.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: olaru12
As reported by Sorcha Faal for all her followers.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: olaru12
As reported by Sorcha Faal for all her followers.
How about this link?
www.bloomberg.com...