Unlike the hollow US threats. NK always does what it says

Unlike north Korea america often does make good on our threats. Weve bombed (well not quite bomb, but blow up) targets in north korea before and they sat there and took it like the good little stooges the norks are.

Lots of fog in north korea. And sun tans

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: Xeven

Nice fear mongering

NK does not have the guidance tech to hit an American target with a nuke. Period.

We have so many countermeasures between them and us, any launch wouldn't make it 50 miles before it was intercepted.

But keep feeding the fear, it does seem to be working.

I don't know accuracy is the most important thing in nuclear arms.....Close enough to the target would be catastrophic!!! Were not talking conventional weapons here.....

a reply to: Xeven

Its been estimated they HAVE 25-30...some say up to 50 nukes...just now a miniaturized deliverable one.

Theyve had 'em...just didnt know how to get em small or big ones into or around the US. Theyve had them for a good while....

I am not sure the US will use nuc's, perhaps Trump will authorize MOAB's. To quote HRC, what difference does it make?

What would NK win by attacking the US?

The only thing they would accomplish is renaming their country when it is taken over by China or handed over to SK by the US.

a reply to: GuidedKill

It is important.

That was the USSR's biggest issue during the cold war, which is why they made so many very powerful weapons culminating in the Tsar Bomba. They didn't have the guidance technology to reliably hit what they were aiming at. So they made them big.

NK can't even make them big. Let alone get it here.

yeah, the U.S. is looking a lot like saddam hussien, remember the mother of all battles that was going to happen if the U.S. invaded Iraq? if you can,you will, if you can`t you will talk #. like they say talk is cheap, BS walks.
saddam talked a lot of crap because he was bluffing and the U.S. called his bluff and steamrolled his ass.

why talk,B.S. and make threats if you are actually capable of doing something? why not just walk softly and carry a big stick?

a reply to: watchitburn

This is incorrect. The reason they kept building and testing bigger bombs (and we did it too) was basically just a dick measuring contest. It was for show. Tsar Bomba had no practical use that couldn't be achieved with a smaller bomb. Not to mention that bomb was innately undeliverable in a real-world combat situation. It wouldn't even fit in the largest bomber they had at the time. They had to make major modifications to one just to drop it. The way it was modified made it slow and very cumbersome to maneuver, in other words a sitting duck to fighter intercept or SAMs. That bomb was NEVER considered for tactical or strategic use. It was a stunt, that's all.

a reply to: watchitburn

They don't need guidance tech.

They just need to get a sub close. Also, they could just get a fishing boat/tanker/container ship/some nondescript boat close with a nuke on board.

a reply to: Xeven

You should build yourself a bunker and go hide in it like in that movie, you know the one.

a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

Ill be fishing.

You must be new to North Korea. They've been threatening us (and the West in general) for the last few decades. Little Kimmy Jr. threatens a "nuclear holocaust" every time he's sanctioned. How many North Korean nukes have hit American soil since his LAST 500 NUCLEAR THREATS so far? Remind me again?

Friday photos from North/South Korea.
www.dailymail.co.uk...
Everyone looks confident and determined! (Unlike our wimps in Congress)

originally posted by: carewemust
Friday photos from North/South Korea.
www.dailymail.co.uk...
Everyone looks confident and determined! (Unlike our wimps in Congress)

LOL, yes, 'everyone looks confident and determined' because anyone showing otherwise would be put before a firing squad.