Leaked Letter From HR McMaster To Susan Rice: Unmasking Scandal Blows Open

Meh, Looks like McMasters cleared Rice to access to her historical material...

That's only fair if she is under investigation...

YMMV

a reply to: JacKatMtn

This could be also. Valid points.

I think what she was doing while I n office was politically
motivated, and she is a known truth fudge at best.

However, reports are that Trump
likes McMaster. ( or did )

a reply to: burntheships

Easiest way for Rice's atty to delay any potential prosecution, is to deny her access to her papers... This letter gave her full access to her papers...


IMO, just more spun madness by the MSM....


SMH....

a reply to: JacKatMtn


I do find it interesting there are two stories out on this,
the one in the MSM mentions nothing of the letter.

Hmmm who to believe?

a reply to: burntheships

LMAO... We know the DRILL...


the target is POTUS.... 24/7...

Counting on the clueless to go full blown hook line and sinker...


Take the bait as it were...


As always.. YMMV

a reply to: JacKatMtn

Here is the alternative universe on the "matter"

"McMaster: Susan Rice Did Nothing Wrong"

www.motherjones.com...

Also here we have strong opinions against McMaster;

EXCLUSIVE: ‘Everything The President Wants To Do, McMaster Opposes,’
Former NSC Officials Say
dailycaller.com...

a reply to: burntheships

Thanks for that link! In my mind, when you pointed out earlier today that John McCain sent McMaster to Trump for his job interview, I knew that he was a poison mole pill.

a reply to: carewemust

Your welcome, I read McCain pulled for McMaster in a few
places. I keep thinking back to 08.

a reply to: burntheships

I got a letter very similar to this when I left the military. It basically told I could transfer my security clearance to a new job if I needed to. Security clearances expire on a date and have to be renewed. A lot of people leave govt employ and still have a security clearance.


So I'm not surprised she got this letter at all. She will get another when it expires that one reminds you of penalties for leaking classified information. Basically tells you not to discuss until after 25 years.

What is unusual however is waiving the need to know status. People who leave got employ must still have a need to know.

a reply to: dragonridr


Thanks, great info for comparison.

The need to know line is curious for sure....

Every government employee I ever knew were de-briefed and their access suspended the last day on the job with the exception of SoS's.

Never heard of anyone keeping an "active" clearance while not in the service of the government.

I debriefed from my TS/SCI on the Friday when I left the DoD to join the FBI,,, I was re-briefed the following Thursday at the FBI after my three day HQ orientation process.

So technically my clearance was suspended from that Friday to the following Thursday.

originally posted by: RickinVa
Every government employee I ever knew were de-briefed and their access suspended the last day on the job with the exception of SoS's.

Never heard of anyone keeping an "active" clearance while not in the service of the government.

I debriefed from my TS/SCI on the Friday when I left the DoD to join the FBI,,, I was re-briefed the following Thursday at the FBI after my three day HQ orientation process.

So technically my clearance was suspended from that Friday to the following Thursday.

That's because clearance requires a sponsor. If she had an active security clearance when it didn't appear she had the need for it then one of two things is true.

1) She was sponsored by someone in secret.

2) She didn't have clearance.


You can't have clearance without a sponsor.

a reply to: carewemust

Yes,I remember when Haig said that.It was his downfall.

a reply to: RickinVa

Your experience is along the lines of what I have known
to be true, appreciate your weighing in on this!