Wasserman Schultz to allow laptop scan after months of stonewalling in IT probe

a reply to: RickinVa

Help me here - If the CIA and FBI have "politically leaning" staff whats to say that the laptop in under the control of the US Capitol Police hasn't already been hacked; or even by a member of the US Capitol Police.

A password stopped them accessing the laptop? Seriously?

thanks

originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: RickinVa

Help me here - If the CIA and FBI have "politically leaning" staff whats to say that the laptop in under the control of the US Capitol Police hasn't already been hacked; or even by a member of the US Capitol Police.

A password stopped them accessing the laptop? Seriously?

thanks

It has something to do with police searching a legislators computer...it's an actual law, but I can't recall how it is specificaly worded at the moment.

originally posted by: RickinVa

originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: RickinVa


Hell it's probably been "wiped with a cloth" by now. Or a totally rebuilt laptop.

It has been in the possession of the capitol police...she's tried to get it back but they have refused....no way it should have been wiped...it may contain a treasure trove of information.

Oh, yeah- and these slimey folks couldn't possibly have someone on the inside doing their dirty work, sneaking in and swapping the hard drive for one specially made for them to investigate...

No way, someone connected to the DNC would never do something so shady...

It could very well be that the incriminating content isn't even on the computer. Now a days, a lot of people keep their emails and documents in the "cloud". Google Drive, Microsoft One Drive, Apple iCloud, etc. If that's what Debbie does (Dallas?), then they could easily get rid of the juicy stuff.

What was her stink about it ? If you are given a computer by your employer , you have to return it before you leave. Especially if it becomes potential evidence in a crime or lawsuit. Then the employer is under extreme obligation to turn it over to the authorities . Unless it has already been confiscated.

Demanding they give it back ?
Tell it to the hand , because the ears are not listening....

originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
It could very well be that the incriminating content isn't even on the computer. Now a days, a lot of people keep their emails and documents in the "cloud". Google Drive, Microsoft One Drive, Apple iCloud, etc. If that's what Debbie does (Dallas?), then they could easily get rid of the juicy stuff.

Everything as at least cached on the local system . And there are links to all data "in the cloud"
Just for further information , there is no "cloud" . It is the same old , same old servers you have always uploaded to....
A different name to "entice" the unlearned.
In some cases , it refers to distributed computing . But they had that in the 90s, Citrix. Remember the SETI @home project ?

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
It could very well be that the incriminating content isn't even on the computer. Now a days, a lot of people keep their emails and documents in the "cloud". Google Drive, Microsoft One Drive, Apple iCloud, etc. If that's what Debbie does (Dallas?), then they could easily get rid of the juicy stuff.

Everything as at least cached on the local system . And there are links to all data "in the cloud"
Just for further information , there is no "cloud" . It is the same old , same old servers you have always uploaded to....
A different name to "entice" the unlearned.
In some cases , it refers to distributed computing . But they had that in the 90s, Citrix. Remember the SETI @home project ?

I remember SETI and I took part to let my PC do some of the crunching. I'm also from the old, old days (very early 80's) when mainframes were king. All computing was done in a data center with terminals connected to it from all over the world. It was called shared computing.

a reply to: LogicalGraphitti

 If that's what Debbie does (Dallas?), then they could easily get rid of the juicy stuff.

Now you've gone and ruined porn.

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
It could very well be that the incriminating content isn't even on the computer. Now a days, a lot of people keep their emails and documents in the "cloud". Google Drive, Microsoft One Drive, Apple iCloud, etc. If that's what Debbie does (Dallas?), then they could easily get rid of the juicy stuff.

Everything as at least cached on the local system . And there are links to all data "in the cloud"
Just for further information , there is no "cloud" . It is the same old , same old servers you have always uploaded to....
A different name to "entice" the unlearned.
In some cases , it refers to distributed computing . But they had that in the 90s, Citrix. Remember the SETI @home project ?

I don't think the FBI searched "The Cloud" after Hillary and her crew destroyed their electronic communication devices with hammers. Isn't EVERYTHING we say/e-mail/text stored by the hosting company (ATT, Verizon, Google, etc.)?

originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
It could very well be that the incriminating content isn't even on the computer. Now a days, a lot of people keep their emails and documents in the "cloud". Google Drive, Microsoft One Drive, Apple iCloud, etc. If that's what Debbie does (Dallas?), then they could easily get rid of the juicy stuff.

Everything as at least cached on the local system . And there are links to all data "in the cloud"
Just for further information , there is no "cloud" . It is the same old , same old servers you have always uploaded to....
A different name to "entice" the unlearned.
In some cases , it refers to distributed computing . But they had that in the 90s, Citrix. Remember the SETI @home project ?

I remember SETI and I took part to let my PC do some of the crunching. I'm also from the old, old days (very early 80's) when mainframes were king. All computing was done in a data center with terminals connected to it from all over the world. It was called shared computing.

And that is the "cloud" . In fact , in some cases , they ARE the same servers as 10 -15 years ago....before the "cloud"

Now , back to the topic...

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
It could very well be that the incriminating content isn't even on the computer. Now a days, a lot of people keep their emails and documents in the "cloud". Google Drive, Microsoft One Drive, Apple iCloud, etc. If that's what Debbie does (Dallas?), then they could easily get rid of the juicy stuff.

Everything as at least cached on the local system . And there are links to all data "in the cloud"
Just for further information , there is no "cloud" . It is the same old , same old servers you have always uploaded to....
A different name to "entice" the unlearned.
In some cases , it refers to distributed computing . But they had that in the 90s, Citrix. Remember the SETI @home project ?

I don't think the FBI searched "The Cloud" after Hillary and her crew destroyed their electronic communication devices with hammers. Isn't EVERYTHING we say/e-mail/text stored by the hosting company (ATT, Verizon, Google, etc.)?

Yes , to most all of that at least. And , in a Data Center in Utah (in the middle of nowhere) ran by one of the 3 letter agencies. Only no one is saying who , really. A new one? Instigated by Obama ? He wasnt one overly concerned with people's privacy.

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
It could very well be that the incriminating content isn't even on the computer. Now a days, a lot of people keep their emails and documents in the "cloud". Google Drive, Microsoft One Drive, Apple iCloud, etc. If that's what Debbie does (Dallas?), then they could easily get rid of the juicy stuff.

Everything as at least cached on the local system . And there are links to all data "in the cloud"
Just for further information , there is no "cloud" . It is the same old , same old servers you have always uploaded to....
A different name to "entice" the unlearned.
In some cases , it refers to distributed computing . But they had that in the 90s, Citrix. Remember the SETI @home project ?

I don't think the FBI searched "The Cloud" after Hillary and her crew destroyed their electronic communication devices with hammers. Isn't EVERYTHING we say/e-mail/text stored by the hosting company (ATT, Verizon, Google, etc.)?

Yes , to most all of that at least. And , in a Data Center in Utah (in the middle of nowhere) ran by one of the 3 letter agencies. Only no one is saying who , really. A new one? Instigated by Obama ? He wasnt one overly concerned with people's privacy.

Thanks for confirming! That's why I want a NEW INVESTIGATION launched on Hillary and her associates. Loretta Lynch's Justice department, and Jim Comey's FBI didn't really try to get to the truth.

Why the current administration is giving Hillary a pass is beyond me! As time goes by, evidence goes away.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
It could very well be that the incriminating content isn't even on the computer. Now a days, a lot of people keep their emails and documents in the "cloud". Google Drive, Microsoft One Drive, Apple iCloud, etc. If that's what Debbie does (Dallas?), then they could easily get rid of the juicy stuff.

Everything as at least cached on the local system . And there are links to all data "in the cloud"
Just for further information , there is no "cloud" . It is the same old , same old servers you have always uploaded to....
A different name to "entice" the unlearned.
In some cases , it refers to distributed computing . But they had that in the 90s, Citrix. Remember the SETI @home project ?

I don't think the FBI searched "The Cloud" after Hillary and her crew destroyed their electronic communication devices with hammers. Isn't EVERYTHING we say/e-mail/text stored by the hosting company (ATT, Verizon, Google, etc.)?

Meanwhile,Bleachbit is up 25% in after hours trading...

a reply to: whywhynot

She has a face you can't forget.

originally posted by: Arnie123
a reply to: whywhynot

She has a face you can't forget.

You just wish that you could forget it.

originally posted by: carewemust
[ don't think the FBI searched "The Cloud" after Hillary and her crew destroyed their electronic communication devices with hammers. Isn't EVERYTHING we say/e-mail/text stored by the hosting company (ATT, Verizon, Google, etc.)?

No but a hacker thought of that. Wasn't it John Podesta that gave away his gmail password to a hacker? You don't need someone's device when you put everything on the Internet - a.k.a. the cloud.

Do you really think the original hard drive is still in her laptop?a reply to: RickinVa

originally posted by: gimcrackery
Do you really think the original hard drive is still in her laptop?a reply to: RickinVa

Yes I do...it was found by the capitol police before she had a chance to get to it.

I love to believe in conspiracies as much as everyone on ATS,,but the fact she resisted so long leads me to believe that there are things on there that she would not want to be public. There should be nothing at all that is classified and I hope Judicial Watch goes after the information with a vengeance.

It should be really turned over to the FBI intact since the Awan bothers are involved.

New developments: The FBI has siezed crushed hard drives from the Awan's home.

Now, per an exclusive report from the Daily Caller, we learn that the twisted plot surrounding the Awan brothers has grown even more interesting as FBI agents have reportedly seized a number of "smashed hard drives" and other computer equipment from their former residence in Virginia.

I would say this is spiraling beyond anything Debbie Wasserman-Schultz can hope to contain.

I found this part interesting:

One bombshell that has been all but ignored by the main stream media is that Imran Awan had access to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz’s iPad password, meaning that the brothers also had direct access to the notorious DNC emails.

...

Some congressional technology aides believe that the Awan’s are blackmailing representatives based on the contents of their emails and files, due to the fact that these representatives have displayed unwavering and intense loyalty towards the former aides.