It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1. I don't see anything in there about people who choose not to purchase insurance.
2. The fact that insurance companies cannot deny benefits (no pre-existing conditions) means that the insurance companies' financial exposure is unlimited. We'll end up with the same problem we have now: sky-high premiums.
3. I see nothing in there allowing a doctor to stop accepting new patients when his workload gets too high.
Paragraph II(A) of this Act shall not be deemed to apply to any person who1. Is in the act of seeing Regular Patients,
2. Is unable to effectively perform the service(s) requested or required due to inability to access proper medical equipment or facilities.
3. Is engaged in a reasonable period of rest/respite/recreation.
4. Has performed his/her service for a period of time typically reserved for professional service, such as work hours, which was advertised and is typically observed.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Blueracer
Government is already involved. That was the biggest problem with Obamacare.
TheRedneck
Two wrongs don't make a right. Government was wrong to ever interfere with the medical free market. Continuing to do wrong by deepening government's involvement won't magically make things right.
The only rational solution is to extract government entirely from the healthcare funding industry
originally posted by: TheRedneck
I have no problem with helping them. I consider it an honor to help them.