It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: DBCowboy
Not to mention colluding with foreign governments for the purposes of influencing an election.
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: underwerks
The system is reaching it's conclusion and it is going to end and it isn't going to be pretty for anyone who is not part of the .01%.
Including Trump too, right? You can't talk about billionaire globalists without including him as well.
originally posted by: MRuss
a reply to: underwerks
Why this matters:
Liberals cannot run around demanding ethics and perfection from the rest of the world when they were perfectly willing----no more than that---crying their ever loving hearts out---but perfectly willing to elect one of the most corrupt candidates the United States has ever seen.
Don't you dare try to hold everyone up to standards you didn't insist on for your own candidate.
God, can you imagine if she was president right now?
originally posted by: seasonal
The system is reaching it's conclusion and it is going to end and it isn't going to be pretty for anyone who is not part of the .01%.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Again;
Hillary Clinton colluded with the media to affect the outcome of an election.
There is honest proof to this.
Yet this is ignored in favor of focusing on simple allegations with no proof that Trump colluded with the Russian government to affect the outcome of an election.
Because, reasons.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: kelbtalfenek
That is a false statement to assume that just because Hillary lost, she is no longer culpable or responsible for illegalities.
We either hold everyone to the same standard or we don't.
Which is it?
originally posted by: RomeByFire
Why do you Trump cultists not hold your messiah accountable when it comes to "locking her up."
She lost, your president has no intentions of pursuing her, you've been played, get over i.
originally posted by: underwerks
There's more important things to worry about right now than what a failed presidential candidate may or may not have done, or thinks about anything.
Get over it.
originally posted by: Painterz
originally posted by: GuidedKill
I can only assume it is because she is a woman...On top of that an extremely unattractive woman who was publicly embarrassed when her husband cheated on her with a over weight dim witted intern.....
This alone probably has a lot of female and feminine men supporting....Just my .02
Sorry, no offense, but of what possible relevance is her perceived level of attractiveness in this debate?
Are we to assume you didn't vote for Hillary because you think she's ugly, but you did vote for Trump because you want to do him?
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Xtrozero
That is why I said the system is reaching it's conclusion. What do you think that means?
originally posted by: GuidedKill
Yes I didn't vote for her because she is an extremely ugly person ... as a whole!!