It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
FBI PROBE INTO CLINTON EMAILS PROMPTED OFFER OF CASH, CITIZENSHIP FOR CONFESSION, RUSSIAN HACKER CLAIMS
A Russian citizen accused of being a hacker by both Russia and the U.S. has claimed U.S. officials offered to cut him a deal if he admitted to interfering in the 2016 presidential election.
Yevgeniy Nikulin, 29, has found himself in the middle of an international dispute between Washington and Moscow, at the very center of which lies U.S. allegations that Russia sponsored a series of hacks targeting Democratic Party candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in favor of Republican candidate and current President Donald Trump.
On October 5, 2016, days before U.S. intelligence publicly accused Russia of endorsing an infiltration of Democratic Party officials' emails, Nikulin was arrested in Prague at the request of the U.S. on separate hacking charges.
Now, Nikulin claims U.S. authorities tried to pin the email scandal on him.
Nikulin was detained in the Czech Republic for allegedly hacking the servers of major sites LinkedIn, Dropbox and Formspring between 2012 and 2013.
While awaiting trial, he claims in an undated letter reportedly given to U.S. Russian-language news site Nastoyashchoe Vremya by Nikulin's lawyer, Martin Sadilek, that the FBI visited him at least a couple of times, offering to drop the charges and grant him U.S. citizenship as well as cash and an apartment in the U.S. if the Russian national confessed to participating in the 2016 hacks of Clinton campaign chief John Podesta's emails in July.
"[They told me:] you will have to confess to breaking into Clinton's inbox for [U.S. President Donald Trump] on behalf of [Russian President Vladimir Putin],” Nikulin wrote, according to The Moscow Times.
Nikulin said he refused the deal, but U.S. officials threatened to return. He claims the visits occurred in mid-November 2016 and on February 7 of this year.
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Ah now it makes perfect sense. This is the story leftist Reddit users were told to ignore because it's disinfo just a few days ago.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Ah now it makes perfect sense. This is the story leftist Reddit users were told to ignore because it's disinfo just a few days ago.
Don't think this is today's expected bombshell.
THIS story is from May. It just flew under the media radar.
If they had actual evidence he did it, why not accuse and charge him?...Why pressure him to admit to it?
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: IAMTAT
If they had actual evidence he did it, why not accuse and charge him?...Why pressure him to admit to it?
The stranger part is how would they have proven it if they had no evidence of all?
"But he already confessed!" would not hold up for very long.
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: IAMTAT
Sounds like another instance of blaming an internet video for a consulate attack.
Sadly, I'm prone to believing this hacker over any politician denying the claim--that's where we are in life at the moment, unfortunately. But honestly, I can't see why a hacker would make this up, but I certainly can see why a political party during a heated election cycle would make the offers that they did.
One side has a narrative to push...the hacker, not so much.
The timeline certainly falls in line with the post-election points when Dems were pushing this Russian-involvement narrative the hardest.