It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: jjkenobi
We only have their word that nothing was obtained.
Why is anyone assuming team trump is telling the truth?
Why?
They lie about everything!
how would Obama have known about the meeting?
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: redtic
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: redtic
To set up a potential October surprise.
All you need in October is something that creates a big enough scandal to swing the polls. It doesn't have to actually be real. None of this will hold up under much scrutiny. See how it's already coming apart? But, had they needed it, they could have brought it all out -- dossier and meeting -- over a period of a few days and done enough damage in the polls for it to not make much difference.
That's all you need late in the game.
Thing is that everyone was firmly convinced that Hillary was going to win ... right up until she didn't, so now they're doing with it what they can. The fact that just about everything unravels and doesn't hold up to scrutiny should be a window into the election scandal mongering reality.
So they concocted this little ruse with an obscure Russian govt lawyer and stuck it in their back pocket just in case, but never used it? That... makes no sense.
How do you know they never used it?
Obama could have used the entire situation to unmask everyone in that meeting.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: burntheships
She's a Russian spy working with the trump campaign.
I'm certain this meeting was a hugh success.
it was a setup from the start that's how. She was seen with Obama's ambassador to Russia and was only here because of Loretta Lynch.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
how would Obama have known about the meeting?
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: redtic
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: redtic
To set up a potential October surprise.
All you need in October is something that creates a big enough scandal to swing the polls. It doesn't have to actually be real. None of this will hold up under much scrutiny. See how it's already coming apart? But, had they needed it, they could have brought it all out -- dossier and meeting -- over a period of a few days and done enough damage in the polls for it to not make much difference.
That's all you need late in the game.
Thing is that everyone was firmly convinced that Hillary was going to win ... right up until she didn't, so now they're doing with it what they can. The fact that just about everything unravels and doesn't hold up to scrutiny should be a window into the election scandal mongering reality.
So they concocted this little ruse with an obscure Russian govt lawyer and stuck it in their back pocket just in case, but never used it? That... makes no sense.
How do you know they never used it?
Obama could have used the entire situation to unmask everyone in that meeting.
yeah you hate assumptions that's why you made none and can source and prove they made a deal and she succeeded.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Ha ha.
Too many assumptions Okham.
how would Obama have known about the meeting?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: diggindirt
Trumps company line today is EVERYBODY DOES IT.
It's not true but that's what they are going with... today anyway.
Could change tomorrow. Today it's being touted as ok because EVERYBODY...