Operation Deflect: White House/GOP Digging up Dirt on Journalists

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: smurfy

Russian Mob lawyer based out of NY, She is an awesome person to trust.

The DNC hired a mob lawyer to criminally entrap Trump Jr.

Lets all just let that sink in.

The DNC approached the Russian mob to try and get dirt on a presidential candidate. They hired their lawyer. I guess whiskey and hookers wouldnt get this one in front of camera huh?

Do yuh think my name is Lamb? what I didn't mention there is that Kushner very probably had a reason to be at that meeting too..and likely Manafort. It was no set-up, there is a whole connection to a Russian state sponsored bank/s, one of which had a Russian spy in the ranks and a law practice connected to surrogacy, out of Brooklyn and the whole thing stinks to hell. Let;s all let that sink in...and, do some more digging!

So then journos can just say whatever they want with no pushback? Where were you during the obama years when obama used the intel community as a political weapon, tapping reporters communications, spare me your feigned outrage triggered snowflake, goodbye

The Russian lawyer who penetrated Donald Trump’s inner circle was initially cleared into the United States by the Justice Department under “extraordinary circumstances” before she embarked on a lobbying campaign last year that ensnared the president’s eldest son, members of Congress, journalists and State Department officials, according to court and Justice Department documents and interviews.

This revelation means it was the Obama Justice Department that enabled the newest and most intriguing figure in the Russia-Trump investigation to enter the country without a visa.

Just five days after meeting in June 2016 at Trump Tower with Trump Jr., Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner and then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, Moscow attorney Natalia Veselnitskaya showed up in Washington in the front row of a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on Russia policy, video footage of the hearing shows.

She also engaged in a pro-Russia lobbying campaign and attended an event at the Newseum in Washington, D.C., where Russian supporters showed a movie that challenged the underpinnings of the U.S. human rights law known as the Magnitsky Act, which Russian President Vladimir Putin has reviled and tried to reverse.

thehill.com...
a reply to: DanteGaland

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

The Russian lawyer who penetrated Donald Trump’s inner circle was initially cleared into the United States by the Justice Department under “extraordinary circumstances” before she embarked on a lobbying campaign last year that ensnared the president’s eldest son, members of Congress, journalists and State Department officials, according to court and Justice Department documents and interviews.

This revelation means it was the Obama Justice Department that enabled the newest and most intriguing figure in the Russia-Trump investigation to enter the country without a visa.

Just five days after meeting in June 2016 at Trump Tower with Trump Jr., Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner and then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, Moscow attorney Natalia Veselnitskaya showed up in Washington in the front row of a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on Russia policy, video footage of the hearing shows.

She also engaged in a pro-Russia lobbying campaign and attended an event at the Newseum in Washington, D.C., where Russian supporters showed a movie that challenged the underpinnings of the U.S. human rights law known as the Magnitsky Act, which Russian President Vladimir Putin has reviled and tried to reverse.

thehill.com...
a reply to: DanteGaland

What's not in that extract you show is that Natalia Veselnitskaya had been in the US since 2015 defending Denis Katsyv, the son of a senior government official and owner of Russian real estate firm Prevezon, even on the day she met Trump Jr. The Prevezon case was ostensibly a far more important affair than the Magnitsky act lobbying, which however is tied up with the Prevezon money laundering case since it was Magnitsky who uncovered the scam and was later murdered, supposedly in a Russian prison. Natalia Veselnitskaya is more than likely a Russian agent, her lobbying and her defense case allowed her to move freely in the US, and to be on any rostrum she wanted that would be related in her official capacity.

BTW, she won her case and Katsyv got off, but only after the original US lawyer in the prosecution case was sacked by Trump Snr, who appointed a new attorney, and who abruptly settled the case.
Kushner and Manafort are also both connected with the movers and shakers of paid for 'banks' involved with this case, and it was all thrown out of the window..there's much more to it than that puny extract which is just being economical with the whole truth just to make it look like it was something that Obama cooked up to have this woman wandering about, when it wasn't.

originally posted by: smurfy

What's not in that extract you show is that Natalia Veselnitskaya had been in the US since 2015 defending Denis Katsyv,

What's not there is how she remained when her parole was only extended to Jan 2016. How was she here in July?

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: smurfy

What's not in that extract you show is that Natalia Veselnitskaya had been in the US since 2015 defending Denis Katsyv,

What's not there is how she remained when her parole was only extended to Jan 2016. How was she here in July?

Use the bap there, when do you think the Prevezon case ended? Well, it was May of this year, the temporary stay was extended...simple as that. You can even see why Messrs Kushner and Trump Jr would be anxious to attend that meeting for some kind of info likely nothing to do with Clinton, more like bigger fish to fry.

a reply to: smurfy

Her stay was until October 2015. It was extended until 2016. State department would not answer when asked why she was here in the Summer ... which is well after May. And how does that explain she was with Obama officials days after meeting Trump Jr?

originally posted by: Czulkang
So then journos can just say whatever they want with no pushback? Where were you during the obama years when obama used the intel community as a political weapon, tapping reporters communications, spare me your feigned outrage triggered snowflake, goodbye

you are aware, trumps trusted news network fox, ran a story for 8 years about a birth certificate?
cnn and others covered bad news stories (benghazi), he didn't get a pass like you imagine, if you missed them that's on you.
if you think stripping the people of medical care, building a wall that would bankrupt the economy and a non muslim ban that only affects muslims but it isn't a ban whoops the president just called it a ban on twitter, again isn't news, that's on you too.
i suppose bush junior hiding in a treehouse during katrina and reading kids stories during a terrorist attack was just biased coverage too?

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: smurfy

Her stay was until October 2015. It was extended until 2016. State department would not answer when asked why she was here in the Summer ... which is well after May. And how does that explain she was with Obama officials days after meeting Trump Jr?

I just told you it was extended again in january 2016 , she was fighting a case in the US. That case only ended this year, check it out.

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: smurfy

Her stay was until October 2015. It was extended until 2016. State department would not answer when asked why she was here in the Summer ... which is well after May. And how does that explain she was with Obama officials days after meeting Trump Jr?

I just told you it was extended again in january 2016 , she was fighting a case in the US. That case only ended this year, check it out.

You said so, but you haven't shown anything. Can you source that? And source what she was doing with Obama officials right after she met with Trump?

a reply to: DanteGaland

Russian ties?... What Russian ties?...

Humm, was I in an alternate dimension, Earth 2, when we all heard "that there was no proof whatsoever that Trump or his team colluded with Russia"?...

Was i in an alternate dimension when we found out that the DNC, and the left-wing media colluded to make false allegations about Republican candidates including President Trump?...

How fast does the left, and the DNC/Hillary fans forget these facts...

The DNC, and the left-wing mainstream media, alongside Fox News tried to use anything, even false allegations to "put skeletons that don't exist in President Trump's closet... But I guess that was okay in the mind of some people...

But when President Trump and his administration try to use "facts" to go after the "fake news brigade", all of a sudden "this is bad"? Even thou President Trump is just trying to go after the people who made false allegations about him?...

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

I asked the same and asked for sources and was replied to with it's proven by media not sourcing it.

This should be absolutely no surprise. It's straight out of the Putin/old-school-KGB playbook. Next up: accidents and poison?

originally posted by: kosmicjack
This should be absolutely no surprise. It's straight out of the Putin/old-school-KGB playbook. Next up: accidents and poison?

...or Operation Mockingbird, FDR's Fireside Chats and resulting media propaganda presentation, decades of citing "national security" during the cold war to ensure the media only presented the narrative the White House wanted, etc... all US led, NOT KGB, programs.

I honestly don't understand why anyone is getting flustered over this. It's little more than a pissing match between the most powerful individual in the world and 6 of the most powerful global corporations (each of whom could easily be blamed for various elements of abuse, decay, and evils in the world at large)... Why in the everloving hell should any American worry themselves over whether one of Jeff Zucker's lap dogs experiences discomfort over being looked into for malfeasance and, while we're at it, ties to entities which would serve as clear cut evidence of a conflict of interest in their ability to provide journalism and news instead of propaganda and BS?

originally posted by: DanteGaland
a reply to: Irishhaf

What happened to minimal government or smaller government

One of the core tenets of conservatism?

Why does THAT only APPLY when it suits your political ideology?

Excuse me...but when the MSM colludes with a political party, in this case the DNC, to make false allegations which are later proved to be wrong something has to be done about it. More so when the mainstream media tries to silence alternative news media and keep colluding with a political party to make more false allegations.

As to your question about "minimal government", which is not really a correct definition as it is a "smaller government" and not "minimal government...." Who exactly do you think should get involved in this when the MSM is colluding with a political party to go after an administration with lies?... You actually think that the DNC should be the one to do it?... Opr maybe you think Soros, and his organizations, alongside every left wing organization will actually try to stop this madness from the left?...

originally posted by: DanteGaland







Their plan, as one member of the team described it, is to research the reporters’ previous work, in some cases going back years, and to exploit any mistakes or perceived biases. They intend to demand corrections, trumpet errors on social media and feed them to conservative outlets, such as Fox News.

Where were you when the media went back years to try and dig up some dirt on Ron Paul, eventually settling on an article that was written some 20 years earlier that may not have even been written by Ron Paul?