It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Scientists announced Wednesday that a much anticipated break at the Larsen C ice shelf in Antarctica has occurred, unleashing a massive iceberg that is more than 2,200 square miles in area and weighs a trillion tons.
In other words, the iceberg — one of the largest in recorded history to splinter off the Antarctic ice sheets — is close to the size of Delaware and consists of almost four times as much ice as the fast melting island of Greenland loses in a year. It is expected to be given the name ‘A68’ soon, scientists said.
“Its volume is twice that of Lake Erie, one of the Great Lakes,” wrote researchers with Project MIDAS, a research group at Swansea and Aberystwyth Universities in Wales that has been monitoring the situation closely by satellite.
The break was detected by one NASA satellite, Aqua MODIS, and confirmed by a second, they said.
The iceberg contains so much mass that if all of it were added anew to the ocean, it would drive almost 3 millimeters of global sea level rise (it takes 360 billion tons of ice to produce 1 millimeter of ocean rise).In this case though, the iceberg is already afloat so there won’t be a substantial sea level change .
originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: Perfectenemy
This crack has been growing for a number of years before it broke off. What do you find suspicious about it?
It's just a normal calving ice sheet, just a lot bigger than normal.
In other words, the iceberg — one of the largest in recorded history to splinter off the Antarctic — is close to the size of Delaware and consists of almost four times as much ice as the fast melting island of Greenland loses in a year.
originally posted by: intergalactic fire
a reply to: rickymouse
Why not tow it to the Western African shore and then transport it to the Sahara? I know some people wouldn't mind that.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
originally posted by: intergalactic fire
a reply to: rickymouse
Why not tow it to the Western African shore and then transport it to the Sahara? I know some people wouldn't mind that.
Wouldn't it be easier and cheaper to move people out of the desert?
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Bluntone22
originally posted by: intergalactic fire
a reply to: rickymouse
Why not tow it to the Western African shore and then transport it to the Sahara? I know some people wouldn't mind that.
Wouldn't it be easier and cheaper to move people out of the desert?
the same people that have lived there for thousands of years? Um, yea, I suppose it would.
originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: abago71
This is not it, but I'm sure it was just as impressive. I'd love to have been there for this though. Can you imagine the sound of it?!