Breaking: Russia Lawyer Veselnitskaya Worked with Obama's Ambassador to Russia?

Someone in one of the threads mentioned the name April Lorenzen.
How is she connected to this?

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Now, to the guy with McCain:

The man pictured here is Mark Fegin, a Soros
funded anti-Putin lawyer.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Someone in one of the threads mentioned the name April Lorenzen.
How is she connected to this?

Tea Leaves....

She posted DNS logs last year, for
mail1.trump-email.com

Some reports say that FBI got FISA warrant based on those logs.

Do you have a link to the posts about her?

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Someone in one of the threads mentioned the name April Lorenzen.
How is she connected to this?

Tea Leaves....

She posted DNS logs last year, for
mail1.trump-email.com

Some reports say that FBI got FISA warrant based on those logs.

Do you have a link to the posts about her?

Reading about her now.
VIDEO with her: twitter.com...

Shes now a hashtag on twitter:
twitter.com...

a reply to: burntheships

Yeah, I think you posted this while I was editing my original comment.



a reply to: IAMTAT

Watched that video, need some bleach for my eyes now.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: burntheships

Yeah, I think you posted this while I was editing my original comment.

 

a reply to: IAMTAT

Watched that video, need some bleach for my eyes now.

I've been hearing on twitter she's connected to Soros.
Need to research this.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Thanks!

Well, the FISA stuff is so tightly wrapped even Lindsay Graham
Cant find out if he was wire tapped.

Stinks to hi heavens!

Is it possible that Goldstone's email to Trump Jr. was intercepted or actually from someone else...with 'unmasking' key words added?

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Ok, sorry! Great information there...

So breaking news now the Dems want to know why the DOJ
settled the Prevezon case.

thehill.com...

a reply to: burntheships

So, they're implying that the case was dropped as a favor to Russia?

Am I reading that right?

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

If it was, it has nothing to do with Trump. It all happened six months before this stuff went down. That she was allowed to stay here at all was because she overstayed her parole that she obtained to represent Prevezon.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Seems they are, which is hogwash.

Something to keep an eye on in the coming days....

a reply to: burntheships

Its funny they try to link it to Trump.

It was Obamas baby, the DOJ that settled. Didnt Obama meet with this lawyer and his ambasador to Moscow around this time?

Wouldnt any collusion be his doing?

Natalia Veselnitskaya was sitting with Obama’s Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul during a Foreign Affairs Committee hearing, 8 days after cold-contacting Trump Jr. in Trump Tower.

www.thegatewaypundit.com...


LOL

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Ok, sorry! Great information there...

So breaking news now the Dems want to know why the DOJ
settled the Prevezon case.

thehill.com...

I wonder if Americans will be able to adopt Russian now?

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: burntheships


It was Obamas baby, the DOJ that settled. Didnt Obama meet with this lawyer and his ambasador to Moscow around this time?

Wouldnt any collusion be his doing?

I believe you are correct, yes.
Lies with Obama...

I'll check into it.

a reply to: windword

Putin is the one who made that law.

Russia has actually been sued over it,
The EU has sued them to try and force
them to reverse the law.

Now that I find appaling.

If Russia does not want Americans to adopt
Russian orphans, they should have that right.

Putin cited a 9 yr old adopted Russian orphan
that was in America, left in a hot car and died.

There was one other case too

a reply to: burntheships

Yes, I think the people adopted the kid and wound up with one who had all kinds of issues, so they took him back like a defective bit of merchandise which I find reprehensible.

When you are adopting foreign, or even domestic, you can't track what may have happened to the kid, and of course, even when you have your own, you can't guarantee they'll be perfect.

a reply to: burntheships

Putin is the one who made that law.

I know that. It was Putin's punitive sanctions on the US as result of the Magnitsky Act, which was the Act under which Prevezon was being financially sanctioned.

Russia has actually been sued over it,

I didn't know that, but it doesn't surprise me. There is no criteria for the ban, other than revenge. The only people hurt by that are the children that need families.

Putin cited a 9 yr old adopted Russian orphan
There was one other case too

Terrible that anything bad should happen to one child, but really, we're talking about 2 children out of how many, in order to justify, or assert that all Americans adoptive parents are abusive and/or neglective parents.

a reply to: windword

Every country has a right to it's own Sovereignty.
Anything else is New World Order, which is immoral.

Do you really think that it is moral for The EU to force
Russia to give them Russian orphans?

a reply to: burntheships


I don't think it's immoral to sue Russia for breaking a treaty or a contract for no good reason.