DJT JR Was Set Up by the DNC. Russian Lawyer worked for Fusion GPS, Group behind phony Dossier

a reply to: Sillyolme

As of this post I still stand behind my nothing burger post.Which I hear is part of DBCowboys new diet.

lawnewz.com...

Short but good article.Didn't want to violate T&C about quoting,so I just provided the link.

This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!

All rules for polite political debate will be enforced.
Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)

You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Ares2493

Too bad the dossier isn't phony.

No the dossier is very real. It's just the information in it that's phony. They basically put a few things in that were already known (like saying water is wet) and then made outlandish claims none of which have been verified and some of which have been proven false.

originally posted by: Ares2493

In a statement, Mark Corallo added: “Specifically, we have learned that the person who sought the meeting is associated with Fusion GPS, a firm which according to public reports, was retained by Democratic operatives to develop opposition research on the President and which commissioned the phony Steele dossier.”

Fusion GPS, which is based in Washington DC and was established by former Wall Street Journal reporters Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch, found itself in the spotlight earlier this year after it emerged it was behind an “oppo research” dossier containing unproven and often salacious allegations about Mr Trump.

DJT JR Was Set Up by the DNC. Russian Lawyer worked for Fusion GPS, Group behind phony Dossier

Fusion GPS founder, and man behind ‘Trump dossier’ cancels testimony to Congress

originally posted by: DoubleDNH

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Kali74

what law was broken?

The shortest answer is they violated 11 CFR 110.20.

Soliciting, Accepting, or Receiving Contributions and Donations from Foreign Nationals
As noted earlier, the Act prohibits knowingly soliciting, accepting or receiving contributions or donations from foreign nationals.

I'll have to find the case but it is established case law that information had inherent value in this kind of matter.

There you go. That's one of many possible angles to take this.

It is also a felony to knowingly falsify SF 86 security clearance form.

I await your post in which an actual case is sited.
I searched and found NONE.

So in an effort to be completely transparent because he's, you know, a quality person... junior releases these emails. How brave. How courageous. How could he be guilty?
And he also gets on tv and talks about how he could have made better decisions.
He's so remorseful and humbling. But you know coming from the pumpkin patch innocence of the streets of New York city he didn't know. Poor little pudknocker country bumpkin.
He don't know nuthin' 'bout no government stuff. Forgive him. He should have made better decisions.


So why didn't he make a better decision and disclose that there were actually six people at that meeting?

Because one of them is a US citizen who's testimony can be subpoenaed?

Hmmmm?

Just how opaque is transparent?

a reply to: Xcathdra

There are no links except manufactured ones . It's a screen to try and acquit the trumps.

Opposition research

New Buzz word. Count how many times the surrogates pump that out today.

Not with foreign countries.
Never.

Trump saying everybody does it is just another lie but ...his lips were moving so we should have known.

originally posted by: underwerks
Aaaand right on cue there's the right wing narrative.

Not surprisingly, it's blame Hillary.

or as I like to call her Wonder Woman.
Even in retirement she keeps the opposition hopping.

a reply to: Xcathdra

The dossier is real. Calling it fake because someone at gateway pundit said it's fake ...well I've seen less evidence for stupid beliefs so...why not.

I guess you have proof that it's fake?

The guy who wrote it is real and he's pretty certain it's real.

a reply to: Xcathdra

She does have links to the Kremlin . She lying. Like Putin did and Kisylak did and trump did.

Why would you believe anything she says?
Because it's exculpatory for trump? It's not if it's based on a lie.

a reply to: UKTruth

Nope a former low level employee did that research. No admin from the DNC sanctioned any such research.
You can't tell the truth if you conveniently leave details out.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

The lady I believe? She's lying through her teeth. I don't believe a word she says.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Yes they have.

a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

I said several laws have been sited. They are in this thread. Don't be lazy.
Or do you just want to confront me and really don't care?

a reply to: butcherguy

Yeah so? Opinions. Let's see what the law says after they are forced to testify shall we?
They are all going under oath now.

Who will get tossed under the bus I wonder???

a reply to: mkultra11

What ever they got from them is the contribution.

You don't believe the known liars when they say they got nothing do you?

Why is their story still evolving if they're so up front and above board?

a reply to: mkultra11

PS you're mixing metaphors too. Lol

a reply to: buckwhizzle

I hear it kills brain cells. Like drinking beer does.