It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WASHINGTON — President Trump on Sunday said he had “strongly pressed” President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia about election meddling during their first face-to-face meeting last week but did not dispute Moscow’s claim that he had accepted Mr. Putin’s denial of involvement, as he declared it “time to move forward” in a constructive United States relationship with Russia.
Mr. Trump’s account of his lengthy and closely scrutinized closed-door meeting with Mr. Putin, which came in a thread of morning Twitter posts, was his attempt to move beyond the controversy that has followed the session after Moscow characterized the election discussion as a meeting of the minds rather than a showdown between the American president and his Russian counterpart.
Mr. Trump’s tweets did little to dispel that notion, as he characterized his own position as an “opinion” and asserted that he was prepared to team with Moscow — which American intelligence agencies say meddled in the election last year, and will attempt to again — on forming an “impenetrable Cyber Security unit” to thwart future breaches.
“I strongly pressed President Putin twice about Russian meddling in our election,” Mr. Trump said in the post. “He vehemently denied it. I’ve already given my opinion.”
“Partnering with Putin on a ‘Cyber Security Unit’ is akin to partnering with Assad on a ‘Chemical Weapons Unit,’”
The claims it's an attempt to move beyond the controversy is exactly what he should NOT be doing; this was an attack on America and he wants to move beyond it?
originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: alphabetaone
The claims it's an attempt to move beyond the controversy is exactly what he should NOT be doing; this was an attack on America and he wants to move beyond it?
I know, right?
FFS, we should just bomb the F# out of them already!!!
originally posted by: The GUT
Being led by the nose with the Ol' Russia trick. Been around since WWII. Some of you folk should study Cold War history.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: alphabetaone
The claims it's an attempt to move beyond the controversy is exactly what he should NOT be doing; this was an attack on America and he wants to move beyond it?
I know, right?
FFS, we should just bomb the F# out of them already!!!
Get away with what? The same thing the US does to other countries?
That's a pretty dumb suggestion. We should let them know theyre not going to get away with it for sure, not create a cyber-division in tandem with them.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: alphabetaone
Well, if Putin Vehemently denied it.........It must be true!
originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
a reply to: alphabetaone
And yet if he Trump had done the complete opposite, the MSM would've still criticized him.
In fact I'm willing to bet there were already pre-emptive articles written by corporate spokesmen ( my word for their journalists ) in the event Trump had handled it entirely differently.
originally posted by: TruMcCarthy
Every major country tries to influence every other major country's elections.
I mean Obama did it with Israel and Britain, supposedly our best allies.
Russia exposed the truth about the corruption of the DNC and Hillary, they didn't hack any votes.
If we are actually concerned about this, let the U.S. strengthen our cyber.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: The GUT
Being led by the nose with the Ol' Russia trick. Been around since WWII. Some of you folk should study Cold War history.
What makes you think there's an unawareness of Cold War history? I mean, I get what you're saying, I just don't see the relevance to the topic at hand.
Afghanistan
The election in 2014 didn’t go as the U.S. intended (like the one in 2009, shot through with fraud that gave it to Hamid Karzai). So the U.S. declared it a tie and created a new position not in the Afghan constitution called Chief Executive Officer.
Vietnam
When the French withdrew from Vietnam in the 1950s, they scheduled an election to be held shortly after. It became increasingly clear that the communist revolutionary leader Ho Chi Minh would win it in a landslide. So the U.S. intervened and installed Ngo Dinh Diem as leader of a new country it recognized as South Vietnam. The national election was canceled, but the U.S. still needed a way to pretend the puppet regime had political support. So it set up an election between Diem, who was widely disliked, and an exiled member of the royal family who was even more hated.
Iran
When Iran elected a nationalist politician, Mohammed Mosaddeq, the U.S. intervened to launch a coup in 1953, which CIA agent Kermit Roosevelt led. Mossadegh’s crime was to nationalize a British oil company, a forerunner to BP, and to spark concerns among the paranoid Dulles brothers that he was leaning toward the Soviet Union.
But in trying to confirm that any of the named people had committed suicide, or even existed, I've turned up nothing.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
a reply to: alphabetaone
And yet if he Trump had done the complete opposite, the MSM would've still criticized him.
In fact I'm willing to bet there were already pre-emptive articles written by corporate spokesmen ( my word for their journalists ) in the event Trump had handled it entirely differently.
Well, since I'm not personally in the habit of soothsaying, I'm only going to let actions that have occurred speak for themselves.