Polish president knocks 'fake news' over wife's Trump handshake

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: introvert
The only narrative I see here, other than the fake news OP narrative, is that Cizzilla reacts on twitter like a teenage girl.

Why post an edited video and then the veiled insinuation? If we can answer that then you will get your answer.

What veiled insinuation? What can we assume when someone tweets OMG over and over?

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: introvert
The full video still shows the First Lady passing over Trump's handshake at first.

And then shaking his hand, making one think that she was not snubbing Trump and there is probably a reason she shook Melania's hand first.

The edited video shows her passing over Trump's handshake, PERIOD. Completely different story.

She still passed over Trump's initial effort and apparently Cizzilla found it funny.

Still not fake and not proof of a narrative.

No, he did not find her shaking his hand second funny, he found the video where she is shown snubbing him and not shaking his hand funny, and admits he knows that's not what happened.

I think you may be confused. I did not say he found shaking his hand second to be funny. I said he must have thought the initial snub was funny.

and there is no initial snub. There is no snub at all unless you post an edited video.

Yes, there is a "snub". Have you not seen the entire video?

I see no snub. A snub is an act of disdain. Following customs and shaking her hand first is not a snub.

More from TheBlaze

CNN’s Chris Cillizza was caught pushing a deceptively edited video that is being shared on social media that makes it appear as though Poland’s first lady snubbed President Donald Trump. A longer version of the video shows what really happened.

Cillizza later clarified — in a tweet with normal capitalization — what is actually happening in the video. “I think there probably wasn’t an intent,” he tweeted. “I think Trump was out of her line of sight.”

Push a fake narrative, get caught, retract... CNN's policy it seems.

www.theblaze.com...

a reply to: introvert

Yes, there is a "snub". Have you not seen the entire video?

You have a source showing the first lady INTENDED to snub trump?

a reply to: shooterbrody

What hypocrisy? We all know that the social media is full of fake news from both sides. Nothing new.

Oops. somehow got a wrong post in the wrong place.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
Again you are still pushing fake news. Show me where CNN is happy to let him do it. Show me an article. If CNN puts up an article correcting him, will you shut up?
No idea why you are so desperate to have this be right? So desperate you can taste it in your mouth.

Yes, an article correcting him or him making an apology to Trump on his twitter with what actually happened. Not his half assed version where he STILL says she snubbed Trump and he did it because it was funny.

LOL.
You're desperate, aren't you?

For what, I would never watch CNN, if they want to push fake news they are welcome to it. If they want to be taken seriously then they need to have serious journalists.

So then why do you care?

I don't care about CNN, I do care about truth and honesty, why don't you?

Um why do you think I am here?

Good question, why are you here? We have a journalists admitting they posted half the truth to get the effect they wanted and the full video changes things.

If you were here for truth you would be against that, you apparently aren't. So you figure out why you are here.

a reply to: knowledgehunter0986

C'mon introvert, debating semantics for 7 pages when you know what the intentions of the tweet were?

No, we don't know. Can you read minds? I can't.

We know obfuscating is your style, but this is quite pathetic even by your standards.

Perhaps you do not understand the meaning of the word 'obfuscate'. If you did, you would recognize that it is the OP that did so.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: shooterbrody

What hypocrisy? We all know that the social media is full of fake news from both sides. Nothing new.

Well if that is a "known fact" then why all the hubub about "russians" and fake stories in social media?
You do not get to have it BOTH ways.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert

Yes, there is a "snub". Have you not seen the entire video?

You have a source showing the first lady INTENDED to snub trump?

He admits there was no snub because it's cultural and was not anything against Trump, but wants to call it a snub anyways .. because CNN I guess?

originally posted by: introvert
What veiled insinuation? What can we assume when someone tweets OMG over and over?

That they have a boner over whatever it happens they are retweeting (the edited video in this case).

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: introvert
The full video still shows the First Lady passing over Trump's handshake at first.

And then shaking his hand, making one think that she was not snubbing Trump and there is probably a reason she shook Melania's hand first.

The edited video shows her passing over Trump's handshake, PERIOD. Completely different story.

She still passed over Trump's initial effort and apparently Cizzilla found it funny.

Still not fake and not proof of a narrative.

No, he did not find her shaking his hand second funny, he found the video where she is shown snubbing him and not shaking his hand funny, and admits he knows that's not what happened.

I think you may be confused. I did not say he found shaking his hand second to be funny. I said he must have thought the initial snub was funny.

and there is no initial snub. There is no snub at all unless you post an edited video.

Yes, there is a "snub". Have you not seen the entire video?

I see no snub. A snub is an act of disdain. Following customs and shaking her hand first is not a snub.

That's why I put it in quotes. It was not a snub, but she still passed over him for his wife.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Um. You don't know the truth. Admit that you don't know the truth. I'm here for the truth. If you want to claim that Cillizza is pushing a false narrative then it's on you to prove that claim. For all we know he could just be laughing at the whole thing. Perhaps a kneejerk reaction to it without thinking. And you have to prove your claim that CNN as a whole is pushing the false narrative.
Who's here for the truth?

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
Ugh this non issue crap all over the news is exactly why the elites can get away with anything ....

The world populace as a whole is getting increasingly easier to distract , and the intellect level seems to be dropping....

I'm well known here on ATS as a vocal non supporter of Trump, but even I can see this wasn't a snub by her....

Crying out loud .....

I agree. No big deal here. She does pass over Trump's handshake, but only out of custom and she still shakes his hand.

Trump took it well.

wow.. No she does not pass over his shake, she did not see it she was looking at Melania the whole time, she then shook Trumps hand,

Stop being so damm gullible because Trump. It makes you look stupid ass hell.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert

Yes, there is a "snub". Have you not seen the entire video?

You have a source showing the first lady INTENDED to snub trump?

See my other post for clarification.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: shooterbrody

What hypocrisy? We all know that the social media is full of fake news from both sides. Nothing new.

Well if that is a "known fact" then why all the hubub about "russians" and fake stories in social media?
You do not get to have it BOTH ways.

The same can be said for birthers.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: introvert
What veiled insinuation? What can we assume when someone tweets OMG over and over?

That they have a boner over whatever it happens they are retweeting (the edited video in this case).

I can agree with that. Having a boner is not the same as pushing fake narratives.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: introvert
What veiled insinuation? What can we assume when someone tweets OMG over and over?

That they have a boner over whatever it happens they are retweeting (the edited video in this case).

I can agree with that. Having a boner is not the same as pushing fake narratives.

you are pushing the fake narrative.

CNN thinks optics matters over facts anyways. A handshake is a frightening business when people are trapped in the cage of their own feelings.

a reply to: introvert

Then I clearly overestimated you because you don't need to be a mind reader to discern what he was trying to insinuate.

I already know how this will go with you, so I'll just end it here.