It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: c2oden
originally posted by: Abysha
a reply to: violet
I see no problem with this. When I see somebody, I gender them with what they look like and how they are presenting themselves. If I'm not sure, I avoid those pronouns altogether. Pretty simple system and it's worked for me so far.
But what I have never had to do was ask somebody for their birth certificate. So why will the baby ever need a sex on their birth certificate? They'll likely grow up feeling like the sex that corresponds to their genitalia and know they are either a boy or a girl without having to consult with their birth documentation.
So... I think it's pretty silly that this will trigger quite a few conservatives. But why? What benefit does it serve in the first place?
It has nothing to do with conservatives or politics.
It's biology.
You are a boy.
Where does it stop?
So... none of that had anything to do with my response. You're just being an asshole.
originally posted by: c2oden
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: c2oden
originally posted by: Abysha
a reply to: violet
I see no problem with this. When I see somebody, I gender them with what they look like and how they are presenting themselves. If I'm not sure, I avoid those pronouns altogether. Pretty simple system and it's worked for me so far.
But what I have never had to do was ask somebody for their birth certificate. So why will the baby ever need a sex on their birth certificate? They'll likely grow up feeling like the sex that corresponds to their genitalia and know they are either a boy or a girl without having to consult with their birth documentation.
So... I think it's pretty silly that this will trigger quite a few conservatives. But why? What benefit does it serve in the first place?
It has nothing to do with conservatives or politics.
It's biology.
You are a boy.
Where does it stop?
So... none of that had anything to do with my response. You're just being an asshole.
No, I'm not being an asshole, I'm just asking where does it stop?
Does it stop at deciding what gender you are? Or can we decide what race we are?
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: c2oden
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: c2oden
originally posted by: Abysha
a reply to: violet
I see no problem with this. When I see somebody, I gender them with what they look like and how they are presenting themselves. If I'm not sure, I avoid those pronouns altogether. Pretty simple system and it's worked for me so far.
But what I have never had to do was ask somebody for their birth certificate. So why will the baby ever need a sex on their birth certificate? They'll likely grow up feeling like the sex that corresponds to their genitalia and know they are either a boy or a girl without having to consult with their birth documentation.
So... I think it's pretty silly that this will trigger quite a few conservatives. But why? What benefit does it serve in the first place?
It has nothing to do with conservatives or politics.
It's biology.
You are a boy.
Where does it stop?
So... none of that had anything to do with my response. You're just being an asshole.
No, I'm not being an asshole, I'm just asking where does it stop?
Does it stop at deciding what gender you are? Or can we decide what race we are?
Nobody decides what gender they are to begin with. You are the one saying that. What I'm saying is that I don't see any benefit to having gender on a birth certificate.
But people will choose to fight some stupid war, waged by equally stupid lefties. But the truth is in the middle. If a baby doesn't have sex on the bc, it makes no difference on the child. No kid feels like their sex because of their birth certificate.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Abysha
It does make a difference though.
What toilet does the child use? Can the child participate in both male and female activists/competitions? Birds and the bees talk when it's older.
The list is quite long with possible problems.
Now, before you start with the whole left/right thing. Don't. It's not about left or right. It's about boy or girl.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: AkontaDarkpaw
What do you mean what it represents for society as a whole? This is just an isolated incident (there are few others as well) and have no effect on society. The baby will know the gender at an early age so you can be sure there is no confusion there.
originally posted by: AkontaDarkpaw
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: AkontaDarkpaw
What do you mean what it represents for society as a whole? This is just an isolated incident (there are few others as well) and have no effect on society. The baby will know the gender at an early age so you can be sure there is no confusion there.
Everything starts as an isolated incident. To say that this won't impact society is naive.
In law courts look for a precedent before making a judgement.
Civil rights movement started as an isolated incident now look what impact it had...
Women's rights, gun control, rape, etc... all of these impacted our society but started out as isolated incidents.
How about homosexuality? That's impacted society... biracial relationships... transgender... all have an impact...
These are just examples of "isolated" incidents that turned into movements that turned into social norms.
Who knows the future impact of this? A precedent has been set and now laws may follow... movements may follow... new norms will be created. It's how society evolves.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: NowanKenubi
How does this impact the society as a whole? How does this affect you?
As I have stated earlier the baby will know it's gender at an early age, so this whole debate is moot. It's not like the parents are going to tell it that "it" is neither a boy nor a girl. As the OP states they let the baby "decide".
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Abysha
By law, the child would have no gender.
Are you suggesting that we just judge gender by what they look like? Doesn't that go against the whole gender identification?