It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: theworldisnotenough
The press is protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Members of the press are free to criticize the government and even the President, his policies and his actions.
The press’s coverage can be “hard hitting,” and this is exactly the type of reporting that the framers of the Constitution had in mind for protections when devising the Bill of Rights.
When the press hits the President hard it’s O.K., but when the President hits back “10 times harder,” it is NOT O.K. because this is threatening, inhibiting, and controlling of the media and highly violative of the First Amendment protections for the press.
If the President engages in this type of behavior, striking back 10 times as hard, then he violates his Oath of Office to defend and protect the Constitution which includes the right of the press to criticize and call the President every name in the book and to even call his sanity into question .
The President, once more, has provided his to opponents one more point, just more grounds to be included in a draft of Articles of Impeachment.
originally posted by: libertytoall
these shmegeggles have their panties in a bunch because they've been caught with their pants down, red handed, so now it's all damage control / deflection / blame trump bush with more fabrication. Sorry your feelings got hurt when you got caught with your pants down but now karma's a bitch.
What problems are you referring to, exactly?
originally posted by: DJW001
while undermining the credibility of the press he will need to rely on in order to actually accomplish any of his goals...
originally posted by: Sillyolme
The press doesn't tell lies.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
your statement is actually void of any point because all you do is allude to what you think instead of presenting any facts.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Bull. They don't do that. Show me one...
“There are transcripts that provide very helpful, very critical insights into whether or not Russian intelligence and senior Russian political leaders including Vladimir Putin were cooperating, where colluding with the Trump campaign at the highest levels to influence the outcome of our election,” Mr. Coons told MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell. “If that information is stonewalled or hidden away and we’re not able to get that on the Senate intelligence committee, House intelligence committee, then I think that has real consequences for our Democracy.”
The Patriots themselves waded into the fight Wednesday, saying the Times’ photo comparison was misleading.
"These photos lack context. Facts: In 2015, over 40 football staff were on the stairs. In 2017, they were seated on the South Lawn," their official account tweeted.
Comparable photos: The last time the #Patriots won two Super Bowls in three years, 36 players visited the White House. Today, we had 34.
"I tweeted a story with incorrect reading earlier. I was working and didn't note the [number] of [re-tweets]," he said. "Fine, it's a correction my original tweet was wrong. Read the story."
www.nytimes.com...