It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Hazardous1408
There is a problem there. History has shown us that these people don't provide much useful information unless tortured, which then opens up the can of apologist worms drenched in Stockholm sauce.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: crazyewok
I've stated plenty in the past that use of torture doesn't bother me. If we're taking a position that these terrorists are "animals" then the legal arguments against torture also go out the window because one has to be human to have human rights.
I won't disagree with the burial in pig guts, however. That should be standard operating procedure for all things Islamofascist terror related.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: crazyewok
I've stated plenty in the past that use of torture doesn't bother me. If we're taking a position that these terrorists are "animals" then the legal arguments against torture also go out the window because one has to be human to have human rights.
I won't disagree with the burial in pig guts, however. That should be standard operating procedure for all things Islamofascist terror related.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: crazyewok
The whole pigs blood/guts/skin thing is stupid. Muslims are only forbidden (not all Muslims follow the same rules) to eat pork. Killing a Muslim with a bullet dipped in pigs blood doesn't make them think they aren't going to paradise.
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: crazyewok
I've stated plenty in the past that use of torture doesn't bother me. If we're taking a position that these terrorists are "animals" then the legal arguments against torture also go out the window because one has to be human to have human rights.
I won't disagree with the burial in pig guts, however. That should be standard operating procedure for all things Islamofascist terror related.
Agreed. And when the actual terrorist apologists complain about how disrespectful that is to their religion, we can just ask them whatever happened to the narrative that terrorists aren't "real" Muslims?
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: face23785
It's not even disrespectful lol. It doesn't insult them, it's just stupid.
Koran gives them an out as far as pork goes. If they need to trick the infidels or if they are really hungry it's ok...
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: face23785
It's not even disrespectful lol. It doesn't insult them, it's just stupid.
Well some muslims got pissy GITMO detainees where fed pork and had to use pages of the koran as toliet paper.
If those where terrorists then surely they wernt muslims and so it was ok to feed them pork right?