a reply to:
AugustusMasonicus
I think it honestly hinges on Asia's economic track. The US, with it's trifecta of major carriers, has reached the point where it will never be
economically viable for a US carrier to operate anything bigger than a 777 on any international route, because if there's demand for something bigger,
that's demand enough for the other two guys to want to get in on that market as well. I wouldn't be surprised though if in the era of the 787, we
start seeing UAL/AA/DAL flying more widebodies on the major domestic routes due to crowding issues at airports like SFO/LAG or BOS/LGA. The only way
the 380 has a future in the US or Europe is if fuel prices continue to tank while our economy stays strong and you see a spike in international travel
by the middle class. That, or if Airbus drops a GTF-powered variant with insane fuel burn numbers that are enough to make the legacy European
carriers consolidate flights into the US.
Asia, for me, is the X-factor though, and the 380 still has the best overall range and fuel burn/seat numbers of anything out there, 4 engines be
damned. If Asia's economic growth continues trending as it has, there is the potential for the creation of nearly 3 billion people with similar
incomes/travel patterns to those of the USA or Western Europe, and due to the population density in India/China, and the few major cities in places
like Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand, etc, I do think there's real potential IF (and it's a big "if") economic development there continues such that
there's demand for flights on par with what we have here. Furthermore, most of those countries are still operating with state carriers, so there's
less competition in terms of international travel, allowing carriers to focus on cost savings rather than having to compete with other domestics for
the same routes. Finally, the huge distances between China, India, Southeast Asia, and the rest of the world are the one place where passengers are
still willing to pay a little extra to fly in the biggest thing possible. That's why even Qantas and South Africa fly 380s. All you need to do is
fire up Flightradar or whatever and look at where the 380's are flying, and you'll see that they're all clustered around the population centers in
China, Southeast Asia, and Australia.
That market clearly "works" for them, and since that market has a lot of growth potential, I'd say that it's too early to completely write off the
A380. The A380 could be like the 737 in the 1980s, or it could be like the DC-10 in the 80s. Looking at how many are already buzzing around Asia
now, I've just got a hunch though that the situation is closer to the 737 right when this little airline from Texas started making money on a route
model using an airliner design that everyone thought was DOA.
Don't count out that GTF upgrade, either. From everything I've seen, it looks as if the NMA will have a 70-100,000lbf GTF of some sort. That would
be the perfect engine for a possible A380NEO, just as the 757's RB211 and its descendants became the go-to engine for the 747 and the A340 in the 80s
and 90s.
edit on 21-6-2017 by Barnalby because: (no reason given)