It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
'Morning Joe' co-host Joe Scarborough claimed Friday morning that presidential strategist Steve Bannon is now effectively running the country – uttering the phrase 'President Bannon' seven times in 35 seconds for dramatic effect. And he said Bannon, not U.S. intelligence agencies, is behind a series of embarrassing leaks about Trump adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner's alleged Russia ties. 'Steve Bannon has been leaking – I believe, based on everything that I've heard – has been leaking these stories,' Scarborough said. 'People very close to Steve Bannon were telling me before the stories were leaked that he was going to be leaking these stories.' 'Two days after I heard this – two days! – [there was a] front-page New York Times story about the links between Kushner and Russia,' he added. 'A coincidence? Absolutely not.' Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk... Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: network dude
What possible motive could Bannon have for leaking?
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: network dude
I think it was Pence. He's smarter than he sounds.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: network dude
What possible motive could Bannon have for leaking?
Slight of hand for one.
Could be they are well thought out and actually planned by the entire Trump team in order to throw a false narrative keeping the dems busy chasing ghosts and tails while they actually work on the real investigations into unmasking and heavy corruption from the former administration.
originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: network dude
What possible motive could Bannon have for leaking?
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: TREESNAKE1111
Since several who were in the meeting have come forward to say that the leak on that was a lie, it's entirely possible they were either fed false info or made it up or leaked something they knew about going in. But they didn't necessarily have to be someone from inside the meeting doing the leaking.