Evolutionists, what are the "evolutionary advantages" of homosexuality?

They can't reproduce so exactly why did they evolve that way?

According to Darwin's hypothesis, what evolutionary "advantage" does homosexuality have?

How is it not the same as saying "sterility has an evolutionary advantage"?

If you can't reproduce, you can't evolve. And if you can't e evolve, you're a dead end and your genes will exit the gene pool.

a reply to: firefromabove

Gay people, unless they've had some form of genital mutilation, are indeed capable of reproducing.

a reply to: firefromabove

Homosexuals didn't evolve.

They are simply a statistical inevitability, much in the same way that some people are born to never actually understand evolution and the evolutionary process.

a reply to: firefromabove

What are the advantages of getting # faced on jameson?

Capable maybe, disgusted with it most likely!a reply to: ColdWisdom

a reply to: WUNK22

why would they be disgusted at jacking off into a cup and then in 9 months collecting the baby from the surrogate. Times have changed my friend no need for any actual sexual contact now a days to make a baby

The evolutionary advantages of homosexuality?

Thats an easy question to answer because youre thinking too hard.

The benefit in terms of evolution and out species isnt a benefit at the individual level, but at the species level. The more people that dont reproduce, the less of a chance we have of our species overpopulating this planet.

Additionally, there are alot of homeless orphan children, there are tons of kids up for adoption and not enough parents. Homosexual couples can adopt and help raise and take care of children.

originally posted by: myselfaswell
a reply to: firefromabove

Homosexuals didn't evolve.

They are simply a statistical inevitability, much in the same way that some people are born to never actually understand evolution and the evolutionary process.

This deserves all the stars.

I'll remember this reply the next dozen times this thread pops up this year.

a reply to: WUNK22

I know many gay men who have children.

a reply to: HaurusTheShaman

That works fine in countries that allow such forms of "procreation" for gay people. But it's the exception not the rule.

If gays need legislation to reproduce, then it doesn't speak well of homosexuality as a product of evolution

originally posted by: Lucidparadox
The evolutionary advantages of homosexuality?

Thats an easy question to answer because youre thinking too hard.

The benefit in terms of evolution and out species isnt a benefit at the individual level, but at the species level. The more people that dont reproduce, the less of a chance we have of our species overpopulating this planet.

Additionally, there are alot of homeless orphan children, there are tons of kids up for adoption and not enough parents. Homosexual couples can adopt and help raise and take care of children.

Exactly. It's not an evolutionary advantage because it has nothing to do with evolution.

But it certainly has societal advantages beneficial to the rest out humanity.

a reply to: firefromabove

There is nothing stopping them from reproducing. If the biology works it works.

originally posted by: myselfaswell
a reply to: firefromabove

Homosexuals didn't evolve.

They are simply a statistical inevitability, much in the same way that some people are born to never actually understand evolution and the evolutionary process.

Actually most people fully understand evolution before coming to the conclusion that its nonsense.

If homosexuality is a statistical inevitably, then clearly its not a good thing

Thanks for admitting it.

Babies born blind, deaf or disabled are also "statistical inevitabilities". Good job admitting that homosexuality is a defect.

Star for you

a reply to: firefromabove

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.

a reply to: ColdWisdom

The person I replied to made that claim about homosexuality being a "statistical inevitability".

Ask him.

a reply to: Golantrevize

Perfect rebuttal question.

Even if gays can't reproduce, they have value as an individual in society. Hunter... gather... house keep.

originally posted by: Lucidparadox

The more people that dont reproduce, the less of a chance we have of our species overpopulating this planet.

By that logic, wars and genocides resulting in hundreds of millions dead is a good thing because ....overpopulation???

Please rethink.

originally posted by: Antipathy17
a reply to: Golantrevize

Perfect rebuttal question.

Even if gays can't reproduce, they have value as an individual in society. Hunter... gather... house keep.

That's besides the point.

It doesn't answer the question: what is the "evolutionary advantage" of homosexuality??

a reply to: firefromabove

well...

they don't have to deal with women

a reply to: firefromabove

They are simply a statistical inevitability, much in the same way that some people are born to never actually understand evolution and the evolutionary process.

Actually most people fully understand evolution before coming to the conclusion that its nonsense.

If homosexuality is a statistical inevitably, then clearly its not a good thing

Thanks for admitting it.

Babies born blind, deaf or disabled are also "statistical inevitabilities". Good job admitting that homosexuality is a defect.

Quod erat demonstrandum