NSA Chief Admits Trump Colluded with Russia!

PC trouble. Anyway, this whole Russia thing is not FAKE NEWS...Your POTUS is LYING TO YOU!!! When are you going to stop defending him?????
He is a liar and chief....What Happened to his 90 day ISIS plan he said he had, and would be the first thing he would take care of...How many deaths has ISIS caused since he took office.. If it were not for Russia Hillary would be POTUS....that is almost a fact...Not 100% but close!!!!
www.yahoo.com...

10/10 thread

originally posted by: kurthall
NOTICE: AboveTopSecret.com management is now enforcing new standards for the opening posts of threads.

Opening posts that contain minimal content, links with little or no explanation, YouTube videos with no commentary, images with little or no commentary, and similar nominal content may be removed without warning or explanation. If your topic is important to you, make sure you explain why, with links and supporting material so that our members may offer more relevant contributions, and ultimately, better threads. In fact, if you have less to say than this simple notice, then you probably do not have enough to start a new thread. Thank you for your assistance in helping to create great threads on ATS.

When you click this form-field, this message will disappear.

I don't believe you.

a reply to: kurthall

LOL

The only place that says "NSA Chief Admits Donald Trump Colluded With Russia" is the title of both "sources".

All lies and nervous Democrat BS.

a reply to: kurthall

a reply to: kurthall

I'll post this here too.....
__________________________________________________________________________

No, that is not what the article says (good article too btw - you should start a thread).

It says...

In his town hall talk, Rogers reportedly admitted that President Trump asked him to discredit the FBI and James Comey, which the admiral flatly refused to do. As Rogers explained, he informed the commander in chief, “I know you won’t like it, but I have to tell what I have seen”—a probable reference to specific intelligence establishing collusion between the Kremlin and Team Trump.

Rogers then added that such SIGINT exists, and it is damning. He stated, “There is no question that we [meaning NSA] have evidence of election involvement and questionable contacts with the Russians.” Although Rogers did not cite the specific intelligence he was referring to, agency officials with direct knowledge have informed me that DIRNSA was obviously referring to a series of SIGINT reports from 2016 based on intercepts of communications between known Russian intelligence officials and key members of Trump’s campaign, in which they discussed methods of damaging Hillary Clinton.

Trump campaign - not Donald J Trump.
source article by John Schindler

a reply to: xuenchen

There you go with your genetic fallacy and attacking the source and not the information therein.

True to form.

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: xuenchen

There you go with your genetic fallacy and attacking the source and not the information therein.

True to form.

OK.

The "information therein" is based on phony sources.

That better ?

a reply to: Sublimecraft


My stupid laptop decided to not work properly when I was posting. Yes this is a good article, and no its not fake news. I am going to laugh so freaking hard at these BLIND people...trump should be POTUS like a bull should be in a china shop...he is embarrassing....He even pissed off England for God sake!!!!

a reply to: kurthall

Read the story, can you quote the part where the NSA chief (who looks like he has trouble sleeping and is a quart low of blood) said this?

I'm going to grab a pair of straws here and write, he colluded with the russians the moment he married a soviet union born lady.



Lel, get it?

The article does not state that Trump, himself colluded with the Russians.

What does "essentially admitted" mean??

originally posted by: kurthall
a reply to: Sublimecraft


My stupid laptop decided to not work properly when I was posting. Yes this is a good article, and no its not fake news. I am going to laugh so freaking hard at these BLIND people...trump should be POTUS like a bull should be in a china shop...he is embarrassing....He even pissed off England for God sake!!!!

Take a look at the link I have provided - it's the source article - I would suggest, before the edit timesout, that you add some information about John Schindler - the writer of the article.

John Schindler is a security expert and former National Security Agency analyst and counterintelligence officer. A specialist in espionage and terrorism, he’s also been a Navy officer and a War College professor. He’s published four books and is on Twitter at @20committee.

Maybe take a look at his twitter handle and see what he's posted in the past.

This thread is also about the source of this information.

Good luck

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: xuenchen

There you go with your genetic fallacy and attacking the source and not the information therein.

True to form.

OK.

The "information therein" is based on phony sources.

That better ?

Got proof of that? Or just like to attack the source that doesn't agree with your narrative?

But if that makes you feel better, carry on.

originally posted by: kurthall
a reply to: Sublimecraft


My stupid laptop decided to not work properly when I was posting. Yes this is a good article, and no its not fake news. I am going to laugh so freaking hard at these BLIND people...trump should be POTUS like a bull should be in a china shop...he is embarrassing....He even pissed off England for God sake!!!!

Oh, so a bull can't go into a china shop now??

Effing racist.

a reply to: kurthall

observer.com...

Last week, when he appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Coats declined to answer questions about the White House’s effort to undermine the FBI investigation of Team Trump, stating, “I don’t feel it’s appropriate to characterize discussions and conversations with the president” in open session. Presumably DNI Coats would be more forthcoming in a closed Congressional session, where classified information can be revealed.

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: xuenchen

There you go with your genetic fallacy and attacking the source and not the information therein.

True to form.

OK.

The "information therein" is based on phony sources.

That better ?

Got proof of that? Or just like to attack the source that doesn't agree with your narrative?

But if that makes you feel better, carry on.

Yeah I got proof.

There's nothing proving any of it is true or even real.

a reply to: kurthall

If this is not fake news, just quote the part where :"NSA Chief Admits Trump Colluded with Russia"

I read it, and just can't seem to find it. Oh, and there is no way they could have known if Trump did, because his wires weren't tapped.

The article doesn't actually confirm what it says in the headline.

More of that alleged "journalistic integrity".