It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UKTruth
"Common sense" isn't a substitute for evidence.
originally posted by: Power_Semi
originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: Power_Semi
Wow,, what a repugnant view, I guess it sums you up completely. You aren't 'on the side' of anyone but those who cause the divisions that end up with what the world is today. You are part of the problem, not the solution.
What the hell are you talking about.
It's easy to sit there and throw insults around - someone my daughter knows has possibly been killed in this - and you want to call me repugnant for being upset?
It's idiots like you that are the problem, whatever injustice has been done to you there is no excuse for killing children - except you seem to think when it's them killing our children.
Your logic seems to be that what we have supposedly done is bad, so it's just for them to kill kids - and being upset about that makes me the problem because dealing with the problem would be somehow infringing on their "rights".
I would say you have a warped view of reality but really you are coming across as one of the leftist idiots who have caused the situation we face - they can do no wrong but be upset about an atrocity like this and the people who did it and you're a bigot and a racist and that's worse than killing children?
Moron.
originally posted by: auroraaus
originally posted by: UKTruth
There is simply no need to import refugees into this country and add to the terrorist problem. Even if the percentage of refugees that are terrorists was as low as 0.1%, that is too high. Somebody needs to explain why bringing in refugees, that have every right to hate us after we bombed their lands and killed their people, helps this country, because at the moment it appears the argument is that adding to the terrorist threat is acceptable.
Would you be willing to tell that to a mother's face who is desperate for a safe place for her children to live and grow?
originally posted by: Justoneman
Ah for goodness sake. He AND UK have stated the logic.
Have some compassion for the kids for goodness sake!
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: UKTruth
I know, right?
We should put a stop to tourism too.
And trousers. They're responsible for many deaths each year.
And Christians, JW's, Catholics, water, air, electricity, cars, planes, boats, animals, vegetables, rocks and a whole bunch of other things.
Let's just ban everything and leave the island with nothing. That way, nothing bad will happen. Hopefully someone from another country will take you in though.
originally posted by: conscientiousobserver
a reply to: Stevemagegod
Do you even know whay the current refugee vetting process entails?
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: auroraaus
originally posted by: UKTruth
There is simply no need to import refugees into this country and add to the terrorist problem. Even if the percentage of refugees that are terrorists was as low as 0.1%, that is too high. Somebody needs to explain why bringing in refugees, that have every right to hate us after we bombed their lands and killed their people, helps this country, because at the moment it appears the argument is that adding to the terrorist threat is acceptable.
Would you be willing to tell that to a mother's face who is desperate for a safe place for her children to live and grow?
Yes... right after we created safe zones in their country.
Now, are you willing to visit Manchester and explain to the mother of the dead 8 year old girl why bringing in more refugees, of which there will be terrorists we can't identify, is a good for this country?
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: UKTruth
I know, right?
We should put a stop to tourism too.
And trousers. They're responsible for many deaths each year.
And Christians, JW's, Catholics, water, air, electricity, cars, planes, boats, animals, vegetables, rocks and a whole bunch of other things.
Let's just ban everything and leave the island with nothing. That way, nothing bad will happen. Hopefully someone from another country will take you in though.
There is no need to stop tourism, though it makes sense to put a halt on tourism from countries that are unable to properly vet their own people. Makes a lot of sense.
Your argument is moot. Just because there is risk in society does not mean you need to add to it, for zero gain. Fairly obvious really.
originally posted by: auroraaus
Would you be willing to tell that to a mother's face who is desperate for a safe place for her children to live and grow?
originally posted by: UKTruth
Yes... right after we created safe zones in their country.
Now, are you willing to visit Manchester and explain to the mother of the dead 8 year old girl why bringing in more refugees, of which there will be terrorists we can't identify, is a good for this country?
originally posted by: auroraaus
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: auroraaus
originally posted by: UKTruth
There is simply no need to import refugees into this country and add to the terrorist problem. Even if the percentage of refugees that are terrorists was as low as 0.1%, that is too high. Somebody needs to explain why bringing in refugees, that have every right to hate us after we bombed their lands and killed their people, helps this country, because at the moment it appears the argument is that adding to the terrorist threat is acceptable.
Would you be willing to tell that to a mother's face who is desperate for a safe place for her children to live and grow?
Yes... right after we created safe zones in their country.
Now, are you willing to visit Manchester and explain to the mother of the dead 8 year old girl why bringing in more refugees, of which there will be terrorists we can't identify, is a good for this country?
Aye and how many blasted years has taken to create "safe zones" in countries in dire straits? Also to add, it is going to take years for these places to recover and prosper.
And I would - in time - because generally mothers will relate to other mothers in the situation. If my child was killed in a terror attack god forbid, I know I personally would not hold that against a foreign child who needs safety.
ETA: It's akin to saying a certain child's life is worth more than anothers.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UKTruth
And now the ad hominems start. Checking off that deflection checklist one-by-one are you? You can't prove that terrorists smuggle in with refugees because it doesn't happen. It's a lot easier to just radicalize native citizens. They have an easier time getting around undetected as they already knows the ins and outs of it. Speaking of common sense and all.
originally posted by: Agartha
originally posted by: auroraaus
Would you be willing to tell that to a mother's face who is desperate for a safe place for her children to live and grow?
Well said, but some people are so full of hate they'd never understand that.
originally posted by: UKTruth
Yes... right after we created safe zones in their country.
Now, are you willing to visit Manchester and explain to the mother of the dead 8 year old girl why bringing in more refugees, of which there will be terrorists we can't identify, is a good for this country?
Saffie was the daughter of Greek Cypriots, immigrants themselves.
originally posted by: UKTruth
I am sure you'd be well received.
Do you realise how many people and children are living in poverty and danger in this world. I assume your solution is not to bring every poor child in danger looking for a better life to this country? If my assumption is correct, why would we choose families where the threat of terrorism is real and stated by people who want to kill us? Why not bring in some kids in danger and poverty from other places in the world????
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UKTruth
And now the ad hominems start. Checking off that deflection checklist one-by-one are you? You can't prove that terrorists smuggle in with refugees because it doesn't happen. It's a lot easier to just radicalize native citizens. They have an easier time getting around undetected as they already know the ins and outs of the country they live in. Speaking of common sense and all.
At least one Syrian refugee who had recently entered Europe was among the seven terrorists who carried out the deadliest attacks in France since World War II, according to authorities. The strikes across Paris left 129 people dead and 352 injured. ISIS claimed responsibility for the attacks Saturday in a statement that warned, “Indeed, this is just the beginning.”