It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: auroraaus
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: kosmicjack
So much for the "good versus evil" speech yesterday.
According to the BBC the Manchester Arena is just calling it an 'incident'.
That's pretty much standard Commonwealth policing-language. Nothing nefarious.
originally posted by: DrStevenBrule
originally posted by: six67seven
a reply to: UpIsNowDown
Maybe for you, but "islamic terrorists" was just mentioned on a MSM station here in the US while discussing this attack with a UK reporter
Wow!
A step in the right direction. How can we fight an enemy that we can't even name?
originally posted by: EvillerBob
originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
If this is indeed what we all suspect, is it a coincidence with Trump's speech yesterday?
Almost certainly. Gathering materials would be done over a period of time to avoid drawing attention. Waiting for a significant target to come up (ie a concert) is more likely to be the decider for timing.
Also, the second device was placed along one of the evac routes. That suggests more planning was involved.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: neo96
Political terrorism is a broad category that includes hundreds of extremists groups. The person I was responding to originally was talking about possible political motivation as in elections etc... My post was to HER stating that that type of terrorist doesn't usually target children like this person or group did.
originally posted by: introvert
CNN just brought-up a good point.
If we assume reports are correct and this person/persons were turned away at the security check point, security did their job and it could have been much worse if the explosives were able to get inside the venue.
originally posted by: EvillerBob
originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
If this is indeed what we all suspect, is it a coincidence with Trump's speech yesterday?
Almost certainly. Gathering materials would be done over a period of time to avoid drawing attention. Waiting for a significant target to come up (ie a concert) is more likely to be the decider for timing.
Also, the second device was placed along one of the evac routes. That suggests more planning was involved.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: joemoe
I think there are 3 populations (at least):
1. The peaceful ones we could all coexist with who just don't want trouble.
2. The ones who seem to be living peacefully but secretly agree with the extremists and will aid and abet them.
3. The violent extremists who need to be shuffled off this mortal coil or completely isolated from the rest of human society.
We can work with #1, but #2 and #3 are both problem groups.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
sigh....
can we please not turn this into a trump thread......
Trumps speach yestarday was just a coincadance.
Now can we move on.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
sigh....
can we please not turn this into a trump thread......
Trumps speach yestarday was just a coincadance.
Now can we move on.
Also, the second device was placed along one of the evac routes. That suggests more planning was involved.