It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: Dfairlite
Yea well, I don't agree with him pretty much putting a great deal of the regions instability on Iran, and basically isolating them as an enemy of the world. It really does not make sense, and yet I know exactly why it is done.
From this same event there was a 55+ nation commitment to create a sort of Arab NATO type thing with an initial 34,000 troops to fight ISIS in Syria and Iraq. Like seriously, wtf?? Would this not be like a Muslim Army of sorts? Whatever it takes I guess. By doing some constructive analysis, I will lay out what I feel some of those actions mean to me.
The fact that there has been a commitment of tens of thousands of troops signed on paper, coupled with a recent massive weapons deal between Saudi and USA, two things come to mind.
The USA is going to reduce its actual physical footprint of its own equipment and personnel from the region. We will fall back to our bases in Iraq, Rojava, Afghanistan and Turkey and pretty much stay there. Stepping up to bat will be these 30,000+ regional troops who don't want to lose US support, so they pitched to purchase more than enough equipment to make up for what we are removing, and the training to go with it.
The plus is that perhaps maybe we can finally reduce our own defense budget and redirect to domestic needs.
So that is how I read this current event plus the weapons deal.
A subtle hint that we are removing ourselves from direct involvement from the region but empowering the regional manpower and selling them the equipment to make up for this tactical retreat of sorts.
originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: MyHappyDogShiner
What was ridiculous about it? He went in front of a group of Muslim nations, told them to stop Islamic terrorism, and got applause. How is that anything short of amazing?
Muslim nations must be willing to take on the burden, if we are going to defeat terrorism and send its wicked ideology into oblivion.
But this future can only be achieved through defeating terrorism and the ideology that drives it.
Some estimates hold that more than 95 percent of the victims of terrorism are themselves Muslim.
A better future is only possible if your nations drive out the terrorists and extremists.
Why on Earth is that amazing and not something he should be doing anyway.
originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: uncommitted
Why on Earth is that amazing and not something he should be doing anyway.
Can you point me to a speech from a prior president (Bush or Obama) where they did this thing you suddenly consider a basic responsibility?
It's really hilarious how insane you lefties have become. If trump does something great that has been sorely lacking from our leadership, it's just a normal everyday thing (despite it not being) that deserves no praise. But if he does something that every incoming administration has done for 50 years (like firing and hiring new attorneys) then it's the world's biggest outrage. It makes you look pathetic.
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
I do like a great speech, Hitler was really good at them as well. Just saying.
originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: Dfairlite
So you agree, the phrase he used again and again and again on the campaign trail isn't one he used in front of the very people he used it against?