It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
... World Bank President Jim Yong Kim announced that Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have pledged a combined $100 million towards a proposed $1 billion global women's entrepreneurship fund — an initiative pushed by Ivanka Trump and German Chancellor Angela Merkel
[/url]
Kim, the World Bank president, released a statement Wednesday saying the organization is working on the initiative, and he thanked Ivanka Trump and German Chancellor Angela Merkel for their leadership on the issues....
originally posted by: missed_gear
a reply to: windword
The promotion of women is different than "pay to play money".
The Clinton Foundation was by no means the World Bank.
The W20 is very much behind pushing G20 nations to recognize the need for womens' advancement AND is on the Advisory Council of the World Bank, Gender and Development.
Ivanka spoke on April 2017 at the W20 concerning such matters and worked with J.Y. Kim to progress in such an endeavor and of course Merkel, President of the G20 (who was also thanked).
... World Bank President Jim Yong Kim announced that Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have pledged a combined $100 million towards a proposed $1 billion global women's entrepreneurship fund — an initiative pushed by Ivanka Trump and German Chancellor Angela Merkel
LINK
[/url]
Kim, the World Bank president, released a statement Wednesday saying the organization is working on the initiative, and he thanked Ivanka Trump and German Chancellor Angela Merkel for their leadership on the issues....
Bloomberg
'Advocating' and 'Soliciting' very different.
Not to mentions the layers upon layers.
mg
originally posted by: AnonyMason
a reply to: JinMI
Saying she won't be involved in soliciting funds, and then her being present in the country that just donated 100 million dollars to the fund disproves that statement.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: missed_gear
You're so naive!
This "fund", birthed by Ivanka, is just another shell corporation to benefit those who play the game.
So she is not allowed to be in a country that donates to the fund?
originally posted by: missed_gear
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: missed_gear
You're so naive!
This "fund", birthed by Ivanka, is just another shell corporation to benefit those who play the game.
I see.
And you know this the same way you can read lips from a still photograph.
Enough said.
mg
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: dragonridr
Hillary Clinton was able to get $25 million to help gays with AIDS in Africa, from the Saudi. Where's the respect?
It's the same ole pay to play game. Difference faces, same rules.
“It’s incredibly non-transparent. We don’t know if there has been any filing. We don’t know how it’s structured — is it a 501(c)3, an LLC, what is it?” Watson told ThinkProgress over the phone. Per the World Bank’s account, that is still up in the air — which means they could not possibly have filed the necessary documents to begin fundraising.
thinkprogress.org...
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: UKTruth
Is it a charity?
“It’s incredibly non-transparent. We don’t know if there has been any filing. We don’t know how it’s structured — is it a 501(c)3, an LLC, what is it?” Watson told ThinkProgress over the phone. Per the World Bank’s account, that is still up in the air — which means they could not possibly have filed the necessary documents to begin fundraising.
thinkprogress.org...
For your comparison to hold up it has to be...
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: UKTruth
For your comparison to hold up it has to be...
What comparison? Between the Clinton Foundation and Ivanka's women's fund? No it doesn't. Pay to play is pay to play, whether it's payments to a charity or payments that are not a charity.
The fact that its "dirty" Saudi money we're talking about, money that Trump thought was too dirty for Hillary but okay for Ivanka's fund, is blatant hypocrisy.
What pay is Ivanka receiving?