Peer-Reviewed Journal Publishes Gender Studies Story Claiming Penises Cause Climate Change

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: infolurker


Wait till they blame penis's for unplanned pregnancy....

#vaginasmatter

wait, thats bloody true !!

a reply to: badw0lf

hold your tongue sir
youre talking about my yolandi

There's a great article on what the findings of the hoax were, and the danger of pay for publish journals.

Here

My favorite part of the study is where they claimed manspreading was r*ping empty space. This is the ridiculous, and this brand if feminism is what really has turned me off to the entire movement.

One of the authors is named Peter--just sayin'.

a reply to: infolurker

Peer-Reviewed Journal Publishes Gender Studies Story Claiming Penises Cause Climate Change

And people wonder why some of us question 'science'.

The fact is everyone should question everything.

Everyone lies to promote their own agenda.

Lol, this is one of the stupidest things I've heard in a while.

Don't blame the penis monster blame trump.

originally posted by: Monsieur Neary
One of the authors is named Peter--just sayin'.

What a dick.

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: infolurker

Maybe there should be a penis tax, based on size and geographical location.

No , get it correct. You shouldnt say "tax" . It would be a "penis credit"

But , thanks to you , I will remember that reply and belly shake chuckle the rest of the day....

a reply to: Metallicus

This isn't science. This is 'social science' -- which isn't very scientific. Essentially it's political criticism based on pseudoscientific 'research'. The left-wing equivalent of the ethnic and historical 'research' performed by the white-is-might-is-right crowd you run with. Except that it's a bit less socially toxic than the far-right stuff.

Less likely to result in fatal consequences -- no guns, you see. And the number of feminists who support the castration of white male racists is actually quite small.

In fact, the authors of this ‘peer-reviewed’ paper admit that it is another hoax like Sokal’s — perpetrated this time not by a physicist and mathematician, but by two philosophers. Which should show you just what respectable academia thinks of this kind of polemical ‘social science’.

I think it’s really funny that so many angry alt-righters fell for it too, along with all the trenchcoat-wearing lesbians.