Anonymous Sources in American Media vs. Wikileaks

So how is the American Media who constantly quotes unnamed sources and LEAKS FULL MEMOS / OTHER CLASSIFIED Documents as front page headlines any different from Wikileaks when they publish full Classified Information as a Political Weapon? They all get there same information from WISTLEBLOWERS. Although there is one major difference between American Media vs. Wikileaks : Wikileaks isn't Biased and hasn't been proven wrong since they have been founded. Democrats loved them when they released Damming information about Bush but quickly changed there tunes when they got a treasure trove of information from John Podestas emails. American Media has been proven to be the Propaganda arm of both the Democrat and Republican arms of the Government. Wikileaks is the only true unbiased Mudslinging that hasn't proven to be wrong or even Fake News.

a reply to: Stevemagegod

How do you know the information obtained by Wikileaks isn't purposely fed to them for the purposes of having legitimate propaganda?

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Stevemagegod

How do you know the information obtained by Wikileaks isn't purposely fed to them for the purposes of having legitimate propaganda?

How do you know the information obtained by American Media Company's isn't purposely fed to them for the purposes of having legitimate propaganda?

a reply to: Stevemagegod

Sounds like you answered your own question?

originally posted by: TreetopControl
a reply to: Stevemagegod

Sounds like you answered your own question?

Just some Late Night thoughts I had. But the title wasn't a Question.

Yeah,I think If Wikileaks was real, they'd be a skidmark by now.

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Stevemagegod

How do you know the information obtained by Wikileaks isn't purposely fed to them for the purposes of having legitimate propaganda?

That is absolutely a possibility, without a doubt.

Here's the thing though, Wikileaks has never been wrong.

If it helps liberal politicians and/or reinforces the dogma of progressivism then anything and everything under the sun is "about getting the truth"

If it hurts the Democratic Party by releasing THEIR OWN EFFING EMAILS then you are traitorous and need to name names...

So, to summarize:
Hurt Republicans: Deify with names like "deep threat"
Hurt Democrats: Crucify them or imprison depending on the century...

As an aside, in order to be a good tolerant liberal you also must excuse anything and everything Islamic...the homophobia, misogyny and Stone Age mysticism is their beautiful culture as dictated by the Prophet....but if Jesus is involved then attack in every conceivable fashion from ACLU lawsuits to property vandalism...

Hope I gave a great primer on liberal logic regarding the dissemination of "data" and the "correct" reaction for the uninitiated progressive not yet part of their moronic groupthink...

-Chris

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Stevemagegod

How do you know the information obtained by Wikileaks isn't purposely fed to them for the purposes of having legitimate propaganda?

That is absolutely a possibility, without a doubt.

Here's the thing though, Wikileaks has never been wrong.

That's why Hillary just wanted to "drone" the Guy. Because she knows that unlike her Domestic Propaganda Machine were they would be lucky to even get half the truth right Wikileaks Truth Rating is 100% correct and why they are considered a intelligence Agency and not Journalists because they aren't controlled by the American Government or any Government for that matter.

a reply to: Stevemagegod
Or shoot them in a robbery but forget to steal stuff.

Seth Rich.