It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: UKTruth
OK, so you read a headline and decided to run with it.
Unfortunately for you when this is looked at by Mueller,
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: alphabetaone
I'd like to hear the context behind what he is saying.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
Actually...I don't believe the word "investigation" was anywhere in his quote. It was something like "ease things about Russia" or something. Which has the possibility to mean something completely different.
I feel pretty confident in saying that what you believe, and what is accurate are widespread. The word investigation is what was reported, so if you would like to challenge it, I would request that you provide something other than your belief.
Trump Told Russians That Firing ‘Nut Job’ Comey Eased Pressure From Investigation
“I just fired the head of the F.B.I. He was crazy, a real nut job,” Mr. Trump said, according to the document, which was read to The New York Times by an American official. “I faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off.”
originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
The title....that is what I referred to, the headline from the source I quoted. Are you really so petty as to care about where I got it, versus what's really at issue in this?
Deflection.....nice try
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
The title....that is what I referred to, the headline from the source I quoted. Are you really so petty as to care about where I got it, versus what's really at issue in this?
Deflection.....nice try
The title is required as per the rules, so that is understandable, but you had the opportunity to be more honest in the OP, which you passed up. We know what is really at issue... it's the Democrats latest hope to undo an election. It's pretty weak too.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
The title....that is what I referred to, the headline from the source I quoted. Are you really so petty as to care about where I got it, versus what's really at issue in this?
Deflection.....nice try
The title is required as per the rules, so that is understandable, but you had the opportunity to be more honest in the OP, which you passed up. We know what is really at issue... it's the Democrats latest hope to undo an election. It's pretty weak too.
Honesty? It's not DISHONEST to not find a need to be redundant. Me personally, I would find it offensive to my intelligence if someone felt the need to be redundant on something I can plainly read. I didn't think I was talking to a majority of children, am I?
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
The title....that is what I referred to, the headline from the source I quoted. Are you really so petty as to care about where I got it, versus what's really at issue in this?
Deflection.....nice try
The title is required as per the rules, so that is understandable, but you had the opportunity to be more honest in the OP, which you passed up. We know what is really at issue... it's the Democrats latest hope to undo an election. It's pretty weak too.
Honesty? It's not DISHONEST to not find a need to be redundant. Me personally, I would find it offensive to my intelligence if someone felt the need to be redundant on something I can plainly read. I didn't think I was talking to a majority of children, am I?
You simply passed through some propaganda with a "madness...just madness" comment for dramatic effect.
Still don't know why you tried to defend the headline when the propaganda was called out, though.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
The title....that is what I referred to, the headline from the source I quoted. Are you really so petty as to care about where I got it, versus what's really at issue in this?
Deflection.....nice try
The title is required as per the rules, so that is understandable, but you had the opportunity to be more honest in the OP, which you passed up. We know what is really at issue... it's the Democrats latest hope to undo an election. It's pretty weak too.
Honesty? It's not DISHONEST to not find a need to be redundant. Me personally, I would find it offensive to my intelligence if someone felt the need to be redundant on something I can plainly read. I didn't think I was talking to a majority of children, am I?
You simply passed through some propaganda with a "madness...just madness" comment for dramatic effect.
Still don't know why you tried to defend the headline when the propaganda was called out, though.
The Trump campaign (and by extension Trump himself) is being investigated, as it's an on-going investigation. Where is the propagandization?
Also it wasn't dramatic effect, it's what I truly believe, that it's all madness....you have a problem with me expressing that?
Exclusive: NSA Chief Admits Donald Trump Colluded With Russia
originally posted by: olaru12
Comey is the least of Trumps worries to date.
Exclusive: NSA Chief Admits Donald Trump Colluded With Russia
Apparently they have records of communications between the WH and Russia.
observer.com...
www.rawstory.com...
originally posted by: allsee4eye
a reply to: olaru12
Collusion by a private citizen with a foreign power is not illegal, never has been, never will be.
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: allsee4eye
a reply to: olaru12
Collusion by a private citizen with a foreign power is not illegal, never has been, never will be.
Unless it becomes criminal conspiracy. If it leads to treason, it is still punishable by death. (Trump might want to set legislation banning he death penalty going.)
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: UKTruth
You might want to get that rather unhealthy fantasy out of your head... it's starting to sound a little insane.
You might want to stop doubling down on contrafactuals... it's undermining your usefulness.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
The title....that is what I referred to, the headline from the source I quoted. Are you really so petty as to care about where I got it, versus what's really at issue in this?
Deflection.....nice try