It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Law enforcement officials say that none of the investigations so far have found any conclusive or direct link between Mr. Trump and the Russian government. And even the hacking into Democratic emails, F.B.I. and intelligence officials now believe, was aimed at disrupting the presidential election rather than electing Mr. Trump.
Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, did not dispute the account. In a statement, he said that Mr. Comey had put unnecessary pressure on the president’s ability to conduct diplomacy with Russia on matters such as Syria, Ukraine and the Islamic State.“By grandstanding and politicizing the investigation into Russia’s actions, James Comey created unnecessary pressure on our ability to engage and negotiate with Russia,” Mr. Spicer said. “The investigation would have always continued, and obviously, the termination of Comey would not have ended it. Once again, the real story is that our national security has been undermined by the leaking of private and highly classified conversations.”
The day after firing Mr. Comey, Mr. Trump hosted Russia’s foreign minister, Sergey V. Lavrov, in the Oval Office, along with the Russian ambassador to the United States, Sergey I. Kislyak. The meeting ignited controversy this week when it was revealed that Mr. Trump had disclosed intelligence from an Israeli counterterrorism operation. A third government official briefed on the meeting defended the president, saying Mr. Trump was using a negotiating tactic when he told Mr. Lavrov about the “pressure” he was under. The idea, the official suggested, was to create a sense of obligation with Russian officials and to coax concessions out of Mr. Lavrov — on Syria, Ukraine and other issues — by saying that Russian meddling in last year’s election had created enormous political problems for Mr. Trump.
The major media conglomerates are all members of the CFR, which precludes any of its media members from accurately or honestly reporting the news, since all of the CFR members have sworn their allegiance to the CFR and its New World Order agenda.
originally posted by: matafuchs
Ok. This 'Russian connection' business is just too out in the forefront for there not be a reason behind it that would benefit those pushing the story. I have been trying to find a quote or an article that could at least back up my idea on why this is happening and I think I did. Let's think about this.
Russia did not think Trump was going to win. No matter what the media says they wanted Clinton because they knew they could control her. She was part of the Russian reboot. She helped with the uranium deal. Her husband made speeches for Russia. They made themselves, the Clinton Initiative and their friends millions and maybe in the long run billions of dollars. She resigned as SecState February of 2013 which was before the invasion of the Ukraine so their would be no conflict of interest again. Obama also never reacted to Russia because he thought Hillary would win.
IN June of of 2016 the FBI said there was no communication or collusion with Russia from the Trump campaign.
This article from the NY Times before the election puts to rest the # show that is now appearing in the media.
www.nytimes.com...
Law enforcement officials say that none of the investigations so far have found any conclusive or direct link between Mr. Trump and the Russian government. And even the hacking into Democratic emails, F.B.I. and intelligence officials now believe, was aimed at disrupting the presidential election rather than electing Mr. Trump.
The Russian 'hacking' to me was something created in the Obama Administration to attempt to distance Clinton from Russia so that when she won people would not be looking into her past ties but blaming Russia for almost ending an election. Then, when it was all said and done, they could move forward, maybe get an apology from Russia and thing would carry on as normal. The US supplying weapons to those who were fighting Russia and the cycle that was in place when Obama was in office would continue.
Russia made the Clintons money.
Now, however, that Donald Trump has won the Russiagate issue is hindering any type of communication between Russia and the US regarding Syria, NK, Iran and the Ukraine. If the administration talks they would immediately be point to as those who are helping the Russians since Russia 'hacked' the election so it is in affect tying the hands of the Trump administration.
Spicer touched on it once...in a 'real' memo.
Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, did not dispute the account. In a statement, he said that Mr. Comey had put unnecessary pressure on the president’s ability to conduct diplomacy with Russia on matters such as Syria, Ukraine and the Islamic State.“By grandstanding and politicizing the investigation into Russia’s actions, James Comey created unnecessary pressure on our ability to engage and negotiate with Russia,” Mr. Spicer said. “The investigation would have always continued, and obviously, the termination of Comey would not have ended it. Once again, the real story is that our national security has been undermined by the leaking of private and highly classified conversations.”
By firing Comey Trump showed first he is not worried about an investigation and second that he will do what he needs to so he can promote a good and fair policy for our country with Russia and the world stage we are involved in together.
The day after firing Mr. Comey, Mr. Trump hosted Russia’s foreign minister, Sergey V. Lavrov, in the Oval Office, along with the Russian ambassador to the United States, Sergey I. Kislyak. The meeting ignited controversy this week when it was revealed that Mr. Trump had disclosed intelligence from an Israeli counterterrorism operation. A third government official briefed on the meeting defended the president, saying Mr. Trump was using a negotiating tactic when he told Mr. Lavrov about the “pressure” he was under. The idea, the official suggested, was to create a sense of obligation with Russian officials and to coax concessions out of Mr. Lavrov — on Syria, Ukraine and other issues — by saying that Russian meddling in last year’s election had created enormous political problems for Mr. Trump.
Trump is no ones lackey but if we would have gotten HRC that is exactly where our country would be right now. If Trump confronts further, like his actions in Syria just yesterday, and does it his own way he is showing he cannot be bought or pushed around like we were for the last decade.
What says you Mud Pit?
originally posted by: matafuchs
Ok. This 'Russian connection' business is just too out in the forefront for there not be a reason behind it that would benefit those pushing the story. I have been trying to find a quote or an article that could at least back up my idea on why this is happening and I think I did. Let's think about this.
Russia did not think Trump was going to win. No matter what the media says they wanted Clinton because they knew they could control her. She was part of the Russian reboot. She helped with the uranium deal. Her husband made speeches for Russia. They made themselves, the Clinton Initiative and their friends millions and maybe in the long run billions of dollars. She resigned as SecState February of 2013 which was before the invasion of the Ukraine so their would be no conflict of interest again. Obama also never reacted to Russia because he thought Hillary would win.
IN June of of 2016 the FBI said there was no communication or collusion with Russia from the Trump campaign.
This article from the NY Times before the election puts to rest the # show that is now appearing in the media.
www.nytimes.com...
Law enforcement officials say that none of the investigations so far have found any conclusive or direct link between Mr. Trump and the Russian government. And even the hacking into Democratic emails, F.B.I. and intelligence officials now believe, was aimed at disrupting the presidential election rather than electing Mr. Trump.
The Russian 'hacking' to me was something created in the Obama Administration to attempt to distance Clinton from Russia so that when she won people would not be looking into her past ties but blaming Russia for almost ending an election. Then, when it was all said and done, they could move forward, maybe get an apology from Russia and thing would carry on as normal. The US supplying weapons to those who were fighting Russia and the cycle that was in place when Obama was in office would continue.
Russia made the Clintons money.
Now, however, that Donald Trump has won the Russiagate issue is hindering any type of communication between Russia and the US regarding Syria, NK, Iran and the Ukraine. If the administration talks they would immediately be point to as those who are helping the Russians since Russia 'hacked' the election so it is in affect tying the hands of the Trump administration.
Spicer touched on it once...in a 'real' memo.
Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, did not dispute the account. In a statement, he said that Mr. Comey had put unnecessary pressure on the president’s ability to conduct diplomacy with Russia on matters such as Syria, Ukraine and the Islamic State.“By grandstanding and politicizing the investigation into Russia’s actions, James Comey created unnecessary pressure on our ability to engage and negotiate with Russia,” Mr. Spicer said. “The investigation would have always continued, and obviously, the termination of Comey would not have ended it. Once again, the real story is that our national security has been undermined by the leaking of private and highly classified conversations.”
By firing Comey Trump showed first he is not worried about an investigation and second that he will do what he needs to so he can promote a good and fair policy for our country with Russia and the world stage we are involved in together.
The day after firing Mr. Comey, Mr. Trump hosted Russia’s foreign minister, Sergey V. Lavrov, in the Oval Office, along with the Russian ambassador to the United States, Sergey I. Kislyak. The meeting ignited controversy this week when it was revealed that Mr. Trump had disclosed intelligence from an Israeli counterterrorism operation. A third government official briefed on the meeting defended the president, saying Mr. Trump was using a negotiating tactic when he told Mr. Lavrov about the “pressure” he was under. The idea, the official suggested, was to create a sense of obligation with Russian officials and to coax concessions out of Mr. Lavrov — on Syria, Ukraine and other issues — by saying that Russian meddling in last year’s election had created enormous political problems for Mr. Trump.
Trump is no ones lackey but if we would have gotten HRC that is exactly where our country would be right now. If Trump confronts further, like his actions in Syria just yesterday, and does it his own way he is showing he cannot be bought or pushed around like we were for the last decade.
What says you Mud Pit?
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
Every day that the US and Russia do not cooperate in attacking ISIS is another day of democrats supporting terror.
It's really that simple. They are being led by traitors, which is obvious to every Trump supporter.