There is a total lack of acknowledgement of any thought other than that which the angry mob insists

a reply to: surfer_soul

Lol of course I don't know, but I can recognise fake smiles and smiles masking fear in eyes when I see it.
Anyone watching NK propaganda who can't see the fear in the peoples eyes must be pretty poor at judging human emotions.
It's like watching 1950's B movies with crap acting.
I would lol if it wasn't so tragic.

a reply to: grainofsand

To be fair I haven't seen much NK propaganda, and no doubt it is a dictatorship. But there is fear in peoples eyes from all countries, from all walks of life, it's the times we live in I suppose. But which country is the biggest threat to world peace at the moment? I don't see it being little NK somehow.

a reply to: surfer_soul

I've never said NK was a threat.
My comments related to the original post in this topic lamely comparing life in the US to NK. Propaganda and stuff.

a reply to: Cutepants

LOl i meant that they were making us cucks, us so we b!tch slapped them back to england

a reply to: grainofsand

I didn't say living in the US is like NK, I said the fake news the press is putting out is full globalist, bought and paid for by corporations, 1984/Commie style propaganda. Everyone knows this even the left. they know its BS but they are working to obstruct. If this is who is vying for power, where will it lead? I've been to 3rd world dictatorship countries, ours was nothing like that ten years ago, but the government/media/deepstate apparatus is getting closer and closer to making us a fake democracy only allowing for the establishment status quo agenda. Globalism is making the fringe outskirts of america poorer and poorer. Soon the middle class will die out, and i would be better off living in a third world hell hole... at least i'd have servants.

www.zerohedge.com...

originally posted by: User1138
a reply to: grainofsand
I said the fake news the press is putting out is full globalist, bought and paid for by corporations, 1984/Commie style propaganda. Everyone knows this even the left.

Can you please explain this? Why would corporations that are by definition capitalist be using communist propaganda ?
If the globalist are all international corporations banks and a global oligarchy then it would be against their best interest to promote communist propaganda since communism and Marxism is critical of capitalism.
I'm not saying there is not corporate propaganda but I hardly doubt it is communist.

Can you clarify the seeming contradictions in your statement?

originally posted by: User1138
a reply to: Cutepants

LOl i meant that they were making us cucks, us so we b!tch slapped them back to england

With the help of "cuckish" french who without their help the revolution probably would have been lost and we would be a commonwealth of England.

Look it is very simple, bIg banks and corporate interests love globalism. They import much cheaper workers into the US regularly, sometimes over the phone/internet even. Electronic automation is also their goal why pay workers when you can buy a machine? Cheap goods are also imported from slave labor wage countries bangladesh, china, india, etc. sweatshop child slaves and such. Our country cannot compete so we import. This is, and will eventually to a larger extent, displace many americans specifically the middle class, they also hate the power they hold and want them to not exist. The trends of globalism and authoritarian technocratic governments show that the middle class will cease to exist.

This is their goal, they want more power. Why deal with a middle class you can't control when you can have a ruling class and a pet/servant class. This is where the communism comes in. The elites also feel bad for there big boats that can hold boats inside them and their 5 hypercars. They also want to throw the lower class a bone and eventually (once big automation/robotics takes hold) roll out some kind of giant universal government wage. Look up the term technocracy on wikipedia it is their ultimate goal. This scares me deeply. I think that this would end western society. people, fertility, purpose, everything about society would stagnate. I also think it would limit freedom severely. but i've really only scratched the surface of the potential problems.

a reply to: SolAquarius

It's the goddamn American Revolution. Sure, the French stepped in late in the game, but by the time they bothered to put down their baguettes and wine, the colonists had already proven they were a solid bet. Even after the Americans won at Saratoga, French assistance was, well, French: underwhelming and plagued by indecision... LOl just kidding i know they were instrumental, and provided most of our supplies and gunpowder... but they didn't want to colonize us anymore, they left us to create our own nation. And again I said WE were the cucks during the revolution, hence the REVOLUTION.

a reply to: User1138

Well they had their own issues to deal with like bloody french revolution that was inspired from our own. Unfortunately it did not go as well for them and then well you know the rise of napoleon and the Napoleonic wars that consumed Europe kept everyone to busy to focus on the new country in north america.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: User1138

All I'm seeing is you just confirming your blind partisanship and lack of critical thinking that you were calling out in the OP. Just the same anti-liberal talking points I'd hear from any conservative or conservative media source.

As objective as I can be and bipartisan, it looks like the lack of "depth" in political conversation here and elsewhere is simply indicative of a point in the conversation, as it were. That point being a point where it was obvious there was never any real desire by one side to come to understanding and conclusion based on even what was best for all. Not just the poor and not just the big for profit camps. So we see who is getting stuck worse and worse is the middle class with money as in jobs or self employed.

a reply to: Logarock



/thread

originally posted by: SolAquarius

originally posted by: User1138
a reply to: grainofsand
I said the fake news the press is putting out is full globalist, bought and paid for by corporations, 1984/Commie style propaganda. Everyone knows this even the left.

Can you please explain this? Why would corporations that are by definition capitalist be using communist propaganda ?
If the globalist are all international corporations banks and a global oligarchy then it would be against their best interest to promote communist propaganda since communism and Marxism is critical of capitalism.

To keep expectations low that capitalists really care. Don't want to stray to far into love they neighbor sort of foundation and explanation for oh lets say the industrial revolution. I mean after all the Reds in Russia were all about taking over the "means of production". They wanted to be capitalists. All Marx really did was to create a bar of behavior and I would use the minimum wage to demonstrate.......but the truth is they both like it. Its not to little and not to much and looks more like mind numb working class fighting for scraps both sides taking credit for gains in the per hour rate.

originally posted by: Logarock

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: User1138

All I'm seeing is you just confirming your blind partisanship and lack of critical thinking that you were calling out in the OP. Just the same anti-liberal talking points I'd hear from any conservative or conservative media source.

As objective as I can be and bipartisan, it looks like the lack of "depth" in political conversation here and elsewhere is simply indicative of a point in the conversation, as it were. That point being a point where it was obvious there was never any real desire by one side to come to understanding and conclusion based on even what was best for all. Not just the poor and not just the big for profit camps. So we see who is getting stuck worse and worse is the middle class with money as in jobs or self employed.

That is the real trick! why are there no compromises for what is best for all?
Why does a coal miner working double shifts just to keep a roof over his family's head, have to hear non-stop about 5 gender bathrooms, and how racist he is for wanting to keep out overwhelming numbers of illegal immigrants?

Why do gays have to have their marriage rights revoked because I want a better health care and economic plan?

Why do we miss out on cleaner, renewable nuclear energy because it's a republican proposal and fu@k republicans?

Why do i have to look like i'm trying to hide the gender pay gap, when I know there is one? It's just a leftover system from when men were the primary bread winners, it's not an oppressive patriarchy just back hazard pay from the 40's and 50's that has yet to catch up to modern times.

Why do I have to deny climate change like 2/3rds of the republican party? I know it's a thing, i just don't think it's the government job to fix it, said nobody in Washington ever.

See a pattern here? is the system deliberately keeping us divided? or is this just the crystallizing result of a two party system?

originally posted by: User1138
Look it is very simple, bIg banks and corporate interests love globalism. They import much cheaper workers into the US regularly, sometimes over the phone/internet even. Electronic automation is also their goal why pay workers when you can buy a machine? Cheap goods are also imported from slave labor wage countries bangladesh, china, india, etc. sweatshop child slaves and such. Our country cannot compete so we import. This is, and will eventually to a larger extent, displace many americans specifically the middle class, they also hate the power they hold and want them to not exist. The trends of globalism and authoritarian technocratic governments show that the middle class will cease to exist.

This is their goal, they want more power. Why deal with a middle class you can't control when you can have a ruling class and a pet/servant class. This is where the communism comes in. The elites also feel bad for there big boats that can hold boats inside them and their 5 hypercars. They also want to throw the lower class a bone and eventually (once big automation/robotics takes hold) roll out some kind of giant universal government wage. Look up the term technocracy on wikipedia it is their ultimate goal. This scares me deeply. I think that this would end western society. people, fertility, purpose, everything about society would stagnate. I also think it would limit freedom severely. but i've really only scratched the surface of the potential problems.

Sounds like capitalism to me.

a reply to: Whodathunkdatcheese

It is, that is the grand lie, the sanctions, regulations, international laws to allow for ultra capitalism need globalist favoring laws. They say they want socialism, and to follow progressives (who want globalsim) just to get the vote. They dont give a sh!t about progressives, why do you think the dnc snubbed Bernie? Hillary was the evil corporate plant.

originally posted by: grainofsand

originally posted by: User1138
a reply to: grainofsand

well you got me on healthcare ill admit it, but that was donein your country when it was feasable in the industry. The swamp people lobbyist prevented that here. Which is why we must #draintheswamp. Oh and don't defend your justice system when you arrest/fine men for catcalling in the street or asking for phone numbers.

Lol, at least I can cross the street wherever I personally deem safe without breaking any laws.
I can get caught with all illegal drugs and get a caution with no arrest so long as it falls within 'personal' amounts.
I can argue calmly with a cop who generally has only an extendable baton and professionally trained with a university degree.
I can walk the streets and one of the least scary things to happen to me is getting arrested.

Yeah, I prefer the illusion of freedom here for sure.

Another thing you are failing to even mention in your defence of your regressive laws (like jail time or fines for misgendering [that's another thing spell check wouldn't even recogize that word because dictionaries can't keep up with the progressives constant making up of words]) are the feminization and general degeneration of modern society.

Maintaining behavior that is reckless and irresponsible as a virtue to be upheld. (not anti-gay just anti rough nude bdsm in the streets like in SF bay area.) Tolerance is no longer good enough, now it's "try being gay for a while, it's better, don't you know?" for example. Also christians being persecuted by gays for their religion, swapping bigotry roles.

a reply to: User1138

Lol you seem to have a thing for gayness like you're scared of catching it

a reply to: grainofsand

for a third time failing to address the issue.

a reply to: User1138

Which issue?
Ask me a direct question and I'll give you an honest answer.