It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Doctor Smith
Ask the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Doctor Smith
Ask the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Don't have time to solve the riddle. Have an article or video from a reliable source?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Doctor Smith
Ask the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Don't have time to solve the riddle. Have an article or video from a reliable source?
You're complaining about the Uranium One "deal" yet you don't seem to know much about it.
Perhaps Wikipedia?
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Doctor Smith
If you are talking about Hillary and the Uranium One deal, that issue has been completely taken out of context.
It was a deal for Russia to buy controlling share of a Canadian company that had operations in the US. None of the uranium was allowed to be exported and the deal was approved by 8 other federal agency leaders.
As far as Trump, I'd rather wait and see what comes out of the investigations.
If you say the Clinton's are innocent. It must be true.
I did not say they were innocent. I said the Uranium One deal has been taken out of context and no evidence has been presented to even suggest Clinton did anything shady in regards to that deal.
Except for the donations made to the Clinton foundation before and after the sale went through. Donations, might I add, that were left off the Clinton Foundation reporting. It was one of the "corrections" that had to be made to their tax filings.
So the Clinton foundation gets donations, Hillary, as SecState, signs off on the deal, and more donations are given to the foundation once the sale / transfer is complete.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Doctor Smith
No information?
What are you responding to then?
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission signed off on the merger you seem so upset about, it had nothing to do with Hillary.
Now, there, those nasty facts are dealt with ... you can get back to your carping about Clinton.
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Doctor Smith
If you are talking about Hillary and the Uranium One deal, that issue has been completely taken out of context.
It was a deal for Russia to buy controlling share of a Canadian company that had operations in the US. None of the uranium was allowed to be exported and the deal was approved by 8 other federal agency leaders.
As far as Trump, I'd rather wait and see what comes out of the investigations.
If you say the Clinton's are innocent. It must be true.
I did not say they were innocent. I said the Uranium One deal has been taken out of context and no evidence has been presented to even suggest Clinton did anything shady in regards to that deal.
How was it taken out of context? They just gave over 100 million to the Clinton foundation out of kindness? Then all the deals went through. Just a coincidence? That's what you believe?
the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.
leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.
The committee comprises some of the most powerful members of the Cabinet, including the attorney general, the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy, and the secretary of state. They are charged with reviewing any deal that could result in foreign control of a U.S. business or asset deemed important to national security.
The ultimate authority to approve or reject the Russian acquisition rested with the Cabinet officials on the foreign investment committee, including Hillary Clinton — whose husband was collecting millions in donations from people associated with Uranium One.
the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Still, the ultimate authority to approve or reject the Russian acquisition rested with the cabinet officials on the foreign investment committee, including Mrs. Clinton — whose husband was collecting millions in donations from people associated with Uranium One.
Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
the only Uranium One official to give to the Clinton Foundation was Telfer, the chairman, and the amount was relatively small: no more than $250,000, and that was in 2007, before talk of a Rosatom deal began percolating. But a review of tax records in Canada, where Telfer has a family charity called the Fernwood Foundation, shows that he donated millions of dollars more, during and after the critical time when the foreign investment committee was reviewing his deal with the Russians.
Telfer’s undisclosed donations came in addition to between $1.3 million and $5.6 million in contributions, which were reported, from a constellation of people with ties to Uranium One or UrAsia, the company that originally acquired Uranium One’s most valuable asset: the Kazakh mines. Amid this influx of Uranium One-connected money, Bill Clinton was invited to speak in Moscow in June 2010, the same month Rosatom struck its deal for a majority stake in Uranium One. The $500,000 fee was paid by Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin.
Whom gave the money to the CF? Be specific.