DNC Fraud - Stolen Democracy: How the Democratic Party Lost the Election and Lost its Soul

I came across a DNC Fraud documentary explaining, essentially, how Sanders and people who donated to his campaign got screwed, how democrats were threatened and retaliated against for not supporting Clinton. How the Clinton campaign engaged in money laundering by donating the max amount to state level DNC groups ($10,000 max), who in turn funneled that money to the back into the Clinton state campaign.

This goes hand in hand with the DNC Fraud lawsuit currently underway in Florida. Democrats who supported Bernie Sanders / donated to him have sued for fraud when it all came out the DNC did all it could to ensure Clinton was the candidate.

It is a long video - about an hour and 45 minutes.

A good watch imo.




* - ATS Thread - Fraud lawsuit
* - Study shows voting irregularities linked to companies that donated to the Clinton Foundation

a reply to: Xcathdra

The class action lawsuit against the Democratic National Committee arises from the 2016 presidential primaries, with more than 100 donors to the committee and to the Bernie Sanders campaign claiming the DNC defrauded them by allegedly favoring Hillary Clinton after promising an "evenhanded and impartial" process in the committee charter.

It is assumed that this case will get dismissed. I am anticipating the judges remarks when he reveals them.

"We could have voluntarily decided that, 'Look, we're gonna go into back rooms like they used to and smoke cigars and pick the candidate that way,'" Bruce Spiva, a partner at Perkins Coie in Washington, D.C., said at an April 25 hearing on the DNC's motion to dismiss. "That's not the way it was done. But they could have. And that would have also been their right, and it would drag the court well into party politics, internal party politics to answer those questions."

Source

The DNC's attorney basically goes into how exactly they are a private company and can do as they wish under whatever pretenses they wish.

a reply to: JinMI

Yeah the problem is the judge knew what was in the DNC charter and noticed the DNC lawyer failed to address it. It was the section on the DNC chair / DNC staff being required to be impartial. The lawyer skipped it for a reason and the judge noticed.

The issue though is not the DNC charter but fraud - lying to democratic voters in order to get their money. I have seen people discussing the money sharing requirements for candidates and it looks like Clinton / DNC screwed Sanders out of over 200 million dollars.

I dont think the judge will dismiss the suit.

a reply to: Xcathdra

"This is a very interesting case, to say the least," Zloch said. "And counsel for the plaintiffs spoke about whether or not our society ... is in a dire situation. And so I leave the lawyers with this. Democracy demands the truth so people can make intelligent decisions."

We will see. I know I hope he does and that would require lots of familiar face testimony.

a reply to: JinMI

I found the part where they discuss the Nevada primary and the script of Sanders supporters throwing chairs interesting.

I see the same thing occurring with Trump and Russia and the Democratic script.

a reply to: Xcathdra

The Russia narrative was actually created to avoid discussion of what was in the emails. Then they went overboard with it, and started lying about they 'hacked the election' to hide the democratic party primary fraud, vote flipping and ballot shredding.

The Russia lie was a 3 threaded attack, they expected Clinton to win the general and to bury discussions of the hacked election, which was done by the DNC against Sanders. When they realized Sanders had been subdued by their soft coup, they re-phrased the Russia narrative to then target Trump.

The third prong of the narrative was actually their hope to attack Russia for forming BRICS economic union.

It was to first distract from the content of the emails LEAKED not hacked. Then it was to infiltrate the conversation about the fraudulent primaries and replace it with 'Russia tampered, hacked' to again, obscure what the deep state did to the Democratic Primary, and the General mind you, but they didn't hack hard enough because they believed their fake polls that Hilary had landslide.

It's all gross.

Bernie was the people's choice, but now he is co-opted by the Democrats, whether by the price of his loved ones and grandchildren, or by 'selling out' doesn't matter. It's effectively the same thing.

Of course Russia is not to be trusted, but this whole false flag about them was in bad taste and damaged this country because they wanted to shove a wall street, pro war, pro international corporate bankster thug candidate down our throats. At any cost and look what it did.

It's sick, and the corporate media, Fox, CNN, MSNBC, Huff Po, Wash Po, NYTimes, Snopes all these accomplices, need to be tried at a UN panel for inciting war crimes and international psychological warfare for their profit wars and fiat petro dollar and swiss IMF loans.

All Russia did was post articles on RT, they didn't stick a hand in America or its elections.

The Russia narrative was made to protect the accomplices who hacked the democratic primary for Clinton, and hacked the general election but underestimated how much they needed to hack it based on their fraudulent polls, and then hoped it would seamlessly flow into geopolitics to justify making an example of Russia for daring to form its own international banking system with BRICS.

Russia's no angel, but that don't mean the US is a Saint. It ain't even close. Not all #'s binary.

a reply to: BlubberyConspiracy

You got it pretty well down . It is such a convoluted process they use to deceive the public ,layered with double deception so as to give them plausible deniability . Then they also seem to have their hooks in state Attorney's Generals to head off at the pass, cases they don't want getting booked into the court system's .

Sibel Edmonds case started out for me as a curiosity .Peter Dale Scott's "Deep State" was the location of these powerful actors pulling the strings of their Swamp monsters . Sibel's vid is long but when you get down to really paying attention you get to understand just how cunning and powerful these people really are . It was quite easy for her to reveal these deep state actors at the end of the day without "naming names" . I suspect the deep state has pictures on all or most of the key people in the halls of power . If they don't ,they are sure capable of creating fake stuff .

a reply to: JinMI

The DNC's attorney basically goes into how exactly they are a private company and can do as they wish under whatever pretenses they wish.

They can as can the GOP... that's why we need to abolish Party's or at least provide a viable alternative to them. We don't need party platforms, we need American platforms.

a reply to: the2ofusr1

Those recordings are heavily edited and only serve to increase the hate of one party toward another. The do the opposite of encouraging Americans to walk away from all party's.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: JinMI

The DNC's attorney basically goes into how exactly they are a private company and can do as they wish under whatever pretenses they wish.

They can as can the GOP... that's why we need to abolish Party's or at least provide a viable alternative to them. We don't need party platforms, we need American platforms.

I don't disagree.

a reply to: Xcathdra

I'm surprised this thread isn't gaining more attraction.

The fake Russian story makes all the sense, and was invented to provide cover.

This Clinton campaign fraught with election fraud is not going to go away, and it's likely the very reason Trump signed the Election Integrity EO.

My God, what a steamroll job they did on Bernie.

If the left doesn't like Trump winning the election, look to blame no other than the DNC and Clinton.

Looking back to when Obama said 'elections cannot be rigged', and then doing a 180 after Trump won, also makes sense in order for them to continue to push the Russian BS. I think the current admin has connected the dots and will be making significant waves within the next 6 months.

a reply to: six67seven

Starting with a new fbi director?

Sanders didn't get screwed he was part of the program.

His message of socialism is ridiculous.

Yes we have an out of balance economy but the solution is not socialism. The solution is the free market.

a reply to: toysforadults

Bernie is very pro free market. His Democratic Socialism had to do with how tax dollars are spent not abandoning Capitalism.

a reply to: JinMI

The DNC's attorney basically goes into how exactly they are a private company and can do as they wish under whatever pretenses they wish.

And this is exactly why when they don't take enough security precautions on their electronic assets, it isn't a national security breach on par with a hacking of the DoD or State Dept.

Like it or not, John Podesta's emails were NOT state secrets. They were the communcations of a private company just like this attorney outlines and not particularly ethical one, too.

a reply to: ketsuko

I couldn't tell by the massive coverage!

a reply to: Kali74

His idea is to steal money from someone else at the end of gun and give it to other people.

That has nothing to do with capitalism.

a reply to: toysforadults

He didnt get screwed?

Take the hour and 22 minutes to watch the video. If you dont have a change of heart, youre simply ignoring reality

He was significantly more popular than hillary and the votes reflected that. So obviously his message resonated which forced the DNC's hand, and they stole the election

a reply to: six67seven

Bernie Sanders was part of the program he didn't get screwed he got absorbed and he did so willingly.

He could have contested it and chose not to, he gave in and capitulate. He is a Democratic plant and propagates a false narrative of bigger government solutions when big government is the problem in the first place.

Why do you think MORE government is going to be the solution?