It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Fools
a reply to: Fools
PS I am "pro-abortion". I am just "anti anyone's but my own BS".
Fixed that for ya.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: intrptr
while sanger was imprisoned for distributing literature that informed women how to prevent conception, the eugenicists were lobbying congress to implement sterilization programs aimed at reducing the number of the unwanteds in the country...
ya see, it's perfectly fine for them to decide just who should or shouldn't reproduce, but no, that decision shouldn't be in the hands of the women who actually do the reproducing!!!
Absatively! And where will the line-up start for these godly folk to adopt the 'babies' they've saved! And of course, there will be a reflection upon the welfare roles as well. Kudos to the godly for stepping up to pay more in taxes for that. Never mind supporting more law enforcement to counter the coming rise in the crime rate: Abortion and crime: who should you believe?.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
Its a good thing they're de-funding PP, because did you know that abortions are just a tiny, Tiny, TINY fraction of the services they provide. They are also responsible for such evil as preventative women's health screenings (mammograms, pap-smears, birth control, etc) for low income or financially limited women.
At last some common sense truly godly folks are in control to reign in this abhorrent evil.
That’s not to say that Sanger didn’t also make some deeply disturbing statements in support of eugenics, the now-discredited movement to improve the overall health and fitness of humankind through selective breeding. She did, and very publicly. In a 1921 article, she wrote that, “the most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective.”
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Violater1
Nope not over my head at all.
Margaret Sanger was NOT a racist.
Margaret Sanger was NOT an advocate of forced sterilizations of blacks.
What Margaret Sanger's personal opinion about adultery was has nothing to do with providing birth control as an option for women (married or not) who don't want to have 18 kids.
Margaret Sanger was a saint who saved many many women from a life of misery and early death.
“By all means, there should be no children when either mother or father suffers from such diseases as tuberculosis, gonorrhea, syphilis, cancer, epilepsy, insanity, drunkenness and mental disorders. In the case of the mother, heart disease, kidney trouble and pelvic deformities are also a serious bar to childbearing No more children should be born when the parents, though healthy themselves, find that their children are physically or mentally defective.” (“Woman and the New Race,” 1920, Chapter 7).
“The main objects of the Population Congress would be to apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring[;] to give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization.” (“A Plan for Peace,” 1932).
“Eugenics without birth control seems to us a house builded upon the sands. It is at the mercy of the rising stream of the unfit” (“Birth Control and Racial Betterment,” Feb. 1919, The Birth Control Review).
“While I personally believe in the sterilization of the feeble-minded, the insane and syphilitic, I have not been able to discover that these measures are more than superficial deterrents when applied to the constantly growing stream of the unfit. They are excellent means of meeting a certain phase of the situation, but I believe in regard to these, as in regard to other eugenic means, that they do not go to the bottom of the matter.” (“Birth Control and Racial Betterment,” Feb. 1919, The Birth Control Review).
In a 1957 interview with Mike Wallace, Sanger revealed: “I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world — that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically. Delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things just marked when they’re born. That to me is the greatest sin — that people can — can commit.”
This line of thinking from its founder has left lasting marks on the legacy of Planned Parenthood. For example, 79 percent of Planned Parenthood’s surgical abortion facilities are located within walking distance of black or Hispanic communities.
Which is why my original response to a question regarding why did the government start funding PP in the first place was:
"Eugenics?"
The Title X Family Planning Program, officially known as Public Law 91-572 or “Population Research and Voluntary Family Planning Programs”, was enacted under President Richard Nixon in 1970 as part of the Public Health Service Act.
Title X is the only federal grant program dedicated solely to providing individuals with comprehensive family planning and related preventive health services.
Title X is legally designed to prioritize the needs of low-income families or uninsured people (including those who are not eligible for Medicaid) who might not otherwise have access to these health care services.
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Violater1
Nope not over my head at all.
Margaret Sanger was NOT a racist.
Margaret Sanger was NOT an advocate of forced sterilizations of blacks.
Margaret Sanger was a saint who saved many many women from a life of misery and early death.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: BlueAjah
yes, they had sterilization programs being forms around the same time as they were throwing sanger in jail for distributing information to women on how to prevent conception....
why do you think that was???
This Supreme Court case led to the sterilization of 65,000 Americans with mental illness or developmental disabilities from the 1920s to the ’70s.
Owing to the complexity of federal and state budgets and somewhat confusing financial data from Planned Parenthood, it is difficult to tell precisely how much money the organization has gotten from the government over the years. But Planned Parenthood has been drinking from that spigot since at least 1970, when Congress passed Title X, the national “family planning” program, and it has grown increasingly reliant on government funding to cover substantial portions of its budget.
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
And where will the line-up start for these godly folk to adopt the 'babies' they've saved!