It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This is because we're a manifestation of the same intelligence that created all things. That encoded sequence with information that convey's a message and meaning we can understand.
originally posted by: neoholographic
This is because we're a manifestation of the same intelligence that created all things. That encoded sequence with information that convey's a message and meaning we can understand.
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: neoholographic
This is because we're a manifestation of the same intelligence that created all things. That encoded sequence with information that convey's a message and meaning we can understand.
I've a theory that this 'intelligence that created all things' isn't energy, or consciousness, but information.
Perhaps information didn't create all things, but simply is all things. It seems that consciousness is a big factor in the creation of things.
That's because there has to be something behind the probabilities
I think this actually points to a Designer of the universe. An Intelligence that understands and controls everything. That intelligence is manifested through us.
Hidden Variables
Counterfactual quantum cryptography (CQC) is used here as a tool to assess the status of the quantum state: Is it real/ontic (an objective state of Nature) or epistemic (a state of the observer's knowledge)? In contrast to recent approaches to wave function ontology, that are based on realist models of quantum theory, here we recast the question as a problem of communication between a sender (Bob), who uses interaction-free measurements, and a receiver (Alice), who observes an interference pattern in a Mach-Zehnder set-up. An advantage of our approach is that it allows us to define the concept of "physical", apart from "real". In instances of counterfactual quantum communication, reality is ascribed to the interaction-freely measured wave function (ψ) because Alice deterministically infers Bob's measurement. On the other hand, ψ does not correspond to the physical transmission of a particle because it produced no detection on Bob's apparatus. We therefore conclude that the wave function in this case (and by extension, generally) is real, but not physical. Characteristically for classical phenomena, the reality and physicality of objects are equivalent, whereas for quantum phenomena, the former is strictly weaker. As a concrete application of this idea, the nonphysical reality of the wavefunction is shown to be the basic nonclassical phenomenon that underlies the security of CQC.
Is there anything truly random?
No. Randomness is what we call it when the cause is so far removed as to be incalculable. You're right that it is impossible to generate a truly random number. Any number generator will have as it basis either physical form or a mathematical rule both of which renders it not totally random. The concept of randomness is that something will appear without any known cause and free of any bias. Since nothing physical can occur this way, then randomness, as an ideal concept, cannot exist nor can it exist mathematically because it has to begin somewhere.