It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Are you saying that there was no historical Jesus who was crucified during the governorship of Pontius Pilate?
Why is it I often wonder that people's minds and hearts are so quickly turned away from Jesus and a consideration of his teaching and his great work of all ages, to the degree that they would express a preference for anything else but Jesus?
And why do I always get the impression that behind these protestations lies a kind of seething snarkiness? I don't get it.
That said, I do realize that the "church" has in many ways dropped the ball in its representation of the Gospel message creating a strong anti-Christian bias among many, but what we're supposed to be getting from it is a model of authentic leadership and authentic love and friendship.
I get the need to rebel against it, I suppose, in so far as it's offensive in a way to the will and pride of man in his own intellectual knowledge who doesn't much like the idea of a need for salvation from above or from a domain of incorruptibility. There's a certain rebellious teenage angst of sorts in reaction/response, particularly among self-professed atheists.
Anyway, to each their own. I find it quite compelling and even breathtaking in it's significance and implications, because it happened and nothing of any lasting value is ever lost or forgotten. It has a timeless significance and it's worthy of consideration.
I guess people feel that it treads on their ego and their desire for self-determination and what the LaVeyan Satanists call a "rational self interest".
But isn't that part of the problem Jesus came to help remedy, where the human being was made in the image of God to stand next to the Godhead and thus is placed in a rather precarious predicament of sorts?
Jesus came to raise us up out of the mire of our own ignorance so that we could be with him in Spirit and know our true nature and place in the grand scheme of things and to be given the power to lay claim to our birthright as co-heirs of the kingdom of life and light and love.
His is the love that never fails and the light that never goes out.
We need that kind of thing when human love fails us, and when we fail in love and have a breakdown in integrity. He restores us, and makes us whole again even in spite of ourselves. There's a certain humor and mirth in that, and I feel sorry for people who would rather lose their own sense of humor in rebellion against it, than to celebrate its true meaning and significance both for ourselves, individually and ultimately in terms of a global salvation.
Jesus is the solution to the problems that ail us all.
Who would rather remain willfully blind to it, than to accept a gift of incalculable value for which there is nothing they can do to either earn or deserve lest they have something to brag about?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Are you saying that there was no historical Jesus who was crucified during the governorship of Pontius Pilate?
Maybe. Maybe not. The proof is rather inconclusive at the moment, but even if I did say he existed that doesn't mean I acknowledge he was demigod or anything.
Why is it I often wonder that people's minds and hearts are so quickly turned away from Jesus and a consideration of his teaching and his great work of all ages, to the degree that they would express a preference for anything else but Jesus?
And why do I always get the impression that behind these protestations lies a kind of seething snarkiness? I don't get it.
Mostly because of Christians who feel like they need to put their religion in everyone's faces all the time, but then again questioning your beliefs is only denying ignorance. It is super funny that Christians always take questioning their faith as a personal attack on them. When -I- was a Christian, I was taught that questioning your faith is supposed to be a good thing because it makes your faith stronger in the end. Of course the people who told me that were assuming I'd come to the same conclusions they did. Though it's a good idea since questioning your beliefs is the foundation of the scientific method.
That said, I do realize that the "church" has in many ways dropped the ball in its representation of the Gospel message creating a strong anti-Christian bias among many, but what we're supposed to be getting from it is a model of authentic leadership and authentic love and friendship.
I get the need to rebel against it, I suppose, in so far as it's offensive in a way to the will and pride of man in his own intellectual knowledge who doesn't much like the idea of a need for salvation from above or from a domain of incorruptibility. There's a certain rebellious teenage angst of sorts in reaction/response, particularly among self-professed atheists.
Anyway, to each their own. I find it quite compelling and even breathtaking in it's significance and implications, because it happened and nothing of any lasting value is ever lost or forgotten. It has a timeless significance and it's worthy of consideration.
I guess people feel that it treads on their ego and their desire for self-determination and what the LaVeyan Satanists call a "rational self interest".
But isn't that part of the problem Jesus came to help remedy, where the human being was made in the image of God to stand next to the Godhead and thus is placed in a rather precarious predicament of sorts?
Jesus came to raise us up out of the mire of our own ignorance so that we could be with him in Spirit and know our true nature and place in the grand scheme of things and to be given the power to lay claim to our birthright as co-heirs of the kingdom of life and light and love.
His is the love that never fails and the light that never goes out.
We need that kind of thing when human love fails us, and when we fail in love and have a breakdown in integrity. He restores us, and makes us whole again even in spite of ourselves. There's a certain humor and mirth in that, and I feel sorry for people who would rather lose their own sense of humor in rebellion against it, than to celebrate its true meaning and significance both for ourselves, individually and ultimately in terms of a global salvation.
Jesus is the solution to the problems that ail us all.
Who would rather remain willfully blind to it, than to accept a gift of incalculable value for which there is nothing they can do to either earn or deserve lest they have something to brag about?
See. None of this is proof of anything. It's just your feelings and how you wish the universe works. I'll be happy to believe you if you can just produce some definitive proof your god exists. God can do everything, it seems, except reveal himself to atheists in a way that even they can't deny him.
I'm also equally curious why he always needs Christians to spread his message and why he can't do it himself. Why is it Christian's responsibility to spread his message to all the heathens and unbelievers? Shouldn't he be capable of doing it himself? Furthermore, since he supposedly created us, why doesn't he realize that humans have short memories and doubt things they can't see for themselves? If I were God, that would tell me that humans would need constant reminders from myself that I exist. Especially if my ego was such that I required my own creations to worship me blindly.