It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In their compelling new book, “Shattered,” the journalists Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes write that Clinton’s loss suddenly made sense of all the reporting they had been doing for a year and a half — reporting that had turned up all sorts of “foreboding signs” that often seemed at odds, in real time, with indications that Clinton was the favorite to win. Although the Clinton campaign was widely covered, and many autopsies have been conducted in the last several months, the blow-by-blow details in “Shattered” — and the observations made here by campaign and Democratic Party insiders — are nothing less than devastating, sure to dismay not just her supporters but also everyone who cares about the outcome and momentous consequences of the election.
(No apparent mention of anything about the DNC/Sanders, though)
According to the book, Obama was ‘determined to make sure that his friend understood that the election was over’ and that she had to accept the loss with dignity to counter Trump’s attempts to undermine the electoral system. Obama said that he ‘didn’t see any point in prolonging the inevitable’ and didn’t want to turn the election into a ‘recount mess’ - then having delivered his message he hung up.
Bill too had sensed that his wife and her campaign team were not grasping the danger that Trump posed. The authors contend that Bill felt that Brexit showed there was a ‘strong contempt for existing power structures that reflected the mood of the American electorate’. The book says that Clinton felt his wife’s team were ‘underestimating the significance of Brexit’.
So it appears that at least on some level, somebody in the vast Clinton universe has some handle on why what happened, happened. Just doesn't seem to be anybody in a position to have done anything to have fixed the campaign (and no, that's not wishful thinking on my part: simple statement of fact).
In fact, the portrait of the Clinton campaign that emerges from these pages is that of a Titanic-like disaster: an epic fail made up of a series of perverse and often avoidable missteps by an out-of-touch candidate and her strife-ridden staff that turned “a winnable race” into “another iceberg-seeking campaign ship.”
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Shamrock6
and there are people that still want her to run again in 2020.
originally posted by: GuidedKill
I don't think this book is going to be that earth shattering....We already know she ran a terrible campaign and was basically unelectable.....
Trump winning has proven that...
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: GuidedKill
I don't think this book is going to be that earth shattering....We already know she ran a terrible campaign and was basically unelectable.....
Trump winning has proven that...
Honestly, Trump was about the worst candidate out there, but, that being said, he connected with the people and he got the votes.
She didn't, and she ran a horrific mess of a campaign, right on down to committing a Romney by more or less insulting half the electorate calling them deplorable.
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Shamrock6
Hillary Clinton almost won the election.
So all of us who are slapping our selves on the back should take heed of what the media can do. They took this dead fish and almost got her elected.
Hillary can still win, especially after/if Trump drops the ball.