Assad says that the US President has no power, that the "Deep State" is in control.

4 key points from President Assad’s first post-attack interview.

“…I was very cautious in saying any opinion regarding him before he became President and after. I always say let’s see what he’s going to do, we wouldn’t comment on statements.

So, actually, this is the first proof that it’s not about the President in the United State; it’s about the regime and the deep state or the deep regime in the United States is still the same, it doesn’t change.

The President is only one of the performers on their theatre, if he wants to be a leader, he cannot, because as some say he wanted to be a leader, Trump wanted to be a leader, but every President there, if he wants to be a real leader, later he’s going to eat his words, swallow his pride if he has pride at all, and make a 180 degree U-turn, otherwise he would pay the price politically”.

This is from Assad's first interview after our attack.

And what hes referring to is the fact that Trump, during the election, had promoted non-intervention.

That the US was in the wrong, supporting the rebels and ISUS vs the Syrian people and their Russian allies.

Clearly Assad was hopeful that there was going to be a shift in US policy.

And it looked like Trump was being sincere.

Right up until the obvious false flag chemical attack blamed on Syria.

Assad is not alone in his sentiment.

We all regret that Trump has been duped by the Deep State, neo-con, globalists which have swooped down on him like vultures on their prey.

Unfortunately, there are some agendas which dont change regardless of the administration...

The two men standing in the way of a Syrian invasion, Flynn and Bannon, have both been removed.

US Peace Council on Syria: nearly everything being reported is a lie.

A few reasons which may explain the war against Syria.

Spicer's Freudian slip: "the goal for the US is to destabilize Syria".

Ron Paul on attacking Syria: "'they' were afraid that peace was going to break out".

a reply to: gladtobehere

Interesting. I was waiting to hear how Assad would reply to the claims.

PS:

a reply to: gladtobehere

Now, what is the deep state and what are their interests ?

a reply to: gladtobehere

US will just call him a liar and a cannibal rapist. Every foreign leader that disagrees with the US on anything ends up being some kind of weird cannibal baby killer type monster that needs to be replaced asap

Trump seemed pretty bound-and-determined to take credit for ordering that strike, so now the shadow government is forcing Trump to order airstrikes that aren't approved by congress?

We'll see how this pans out, I'm convinced it was a false flag attack... I don't think the Syrians ordered that strike. But it sure is a convenient way for Trumps administration to present a perceived hard-line on Russia while a not-insignificant number of his campaign have been found to have been bribed to look out for Russia's interests.

I can buy that. It's trendy to say, "But, but, but Trump is the cause." No, he's not. He's not anymore the "cause" than Bush, Obama or any of the other dotes that have held office are.

Here's the real deal. Trump is authentically a Populist, which contributes to the hatred the establishment has for him. However, the man has lended his ear in too many directions. Bush did the same.

When your mind is in one direction and you have Joe "cool" elitist whispering sweet anecdotal bull# in your right and left ears, you find yourself in a rather unadmirable position.

I am not defending these people we call presidents. No, not at all. They have the option to not go along. They're culpable as well due to their compliance, but JFK is an example of what non-compliance "rewards" you at this level. Not many are altruistic enough to risk that "fate."

You are being lied to about the Ukraine it was a Soros/US State department maidan coup the place is now run by neo-nazis,the Crimea was a democratic election it was not annexed,there is no concrete proof of Russian election tampering or Syria gassing its own people your just being given the information is classified line,it doesn't exist,Russia is not provoking militarily there was an agreement with Reagan not to build up on Russias borders this has been broken by build ups in the Baltics and Eastern Europe such as 2000 tanks being deployed.

The USA has been pushing for war on 4-5-6 fronts and the hypnotised chickens are being fed crap all the way.Meanwhile Russian and Chinese citizens are having drills and preparing for war.The countries you face are united and your military is running on rubber bands and plastocene I truly suggest you all flood your congressthing with demands to stop this nonsense because it wont end well if you dont.

Assad says that the US President has no power, that the "Deep State" is in control

Says the Russian puppet.

The only reason Assad still has power.

Russia/Iran/China/North Korea.

Trump hasn't been duped by the deep state, he is the deep state. As is any billionaire that is friends with the Clinton's and attends the same functions and knows the same people. They all run in the same circles.

All he did was use people's hope against them by convincing his followers he wasn't more of the same. As every president within memory has done.

It shows you the general public's willingness to believe someone when they wrap themselves in the American flag, no matter how dirty or criminal they really are.

originally posted by: neo96
Assad says that the US President has no power, that the "Deep State" is in control

Says the Russian puppet.

The only reason Assad still has power.

Russia/Iran/China/North Korea.

Foreign support is not enough to stop a Revolution.

A genuine revolution would have ousted him.

Obama & Hillary Importing foreign mercenaries and Wahhabi terrorists does not constitute a revolution.

a reply to: Ohanka

That's what some local witneses mentionned :

An Eyewitness to the Syrian Rebellion: Father Frans in His Own Words

An examination of texts published by Father Frans van der Lugt in 2011 and 2012 shows that the late Dutch Jesuit priest had a dim view of the Syrian rebellion, which he held to be the work of a violent minority, and favored a process of political reform in Syria to be implemented by the current government under President Bashar Al-Assad.

Father Frans was murdered under still unclarified circumstances in the embattled Syrian city of Homs earlier this month.(April 2014)

...

From the start, the protest movements were not purely peaceful. From the start I saw armed demonstrators marching along in the protests, who began to shoot at the police first. Very often the violence of the security forces has been a reaction to the brutal violence of the armed rebels.

...

Moreover, from the start there has been the problem of the armed groups, which are also part of the opposition….The opposition of the street is much stronger than any other opposition. And this opposition is armed and frequently employs brutality and violence, only in order then to blame the government. Many representatives of the government (regeringsmensen – Father Frans might also be referring to supporters of the government) have been tortured and shot dead by them.

...

In the first place, it has to be said that it is very difficult to provide a nuanced and objective account of what is happening. Many journalists fall into describing matters in black and white. For them, good and evil are not interwoven, but are clearly separated. They demonize the one side and glorify the other. Thus, for example, it is not true that our (the Syrian) government has only bad sides and the opposition only good ones. But because the US, Europe and certain Arab countries support the opposition, they endeavor, whether consciously or unconsciously, to idealize it as much as possible, without engaging in any careful analysis of the real situation. Certain interests are obscuring our view of the real situation and contaminating the description of it.

originally posted by: theultimatebelgianjoke
a reply to: gladtobehere

Now, what is the deep state and what are their interests ?

 

Interesting article. What it tells me is that this nonsense is all about hatred by one country of another (Iran/Israel). Each of those countries has allies and all of them are now dragged into this. If the middle east could just accept the Jews, we could get back to fighting over oil.

a reply to: LogicalGraphitti

It is not an article, it is a mail from Clinton part of her FBI email release.
Maybe the ME would be more tolerant with Israel, if wars wern't started in all the neighbouring countries in order to protect the nuclear supremacy of a rogue nuclear state.

a reply to: gladtobehere

He's right too. Nought but a puppet of the state, more akin to a game show host. He doesn't control anything, just reads the script from the teleprompter, like all the rest.

Haven't you guys noticed, during the campaign he never used them. He does now...

images

Edit: We all learned that was kay from early on in elementary school. They taught us acceptance with Flashcards.

a reply to: Ohanka

A genuine revolution would have ousted him.

Not exactly.

Our American Revolution had foreign support.

Assad is brave a man. Talk like that will get a lot of "Freedom" launched and dropped on him.

LOL, "the obvious false flag chemical attack". Assad's propaganda replayed on ATS and across social media just like clockwork. There is a nefarious conspiracy alright, and it involves the dissemination of this garbage and who is behind it.

originally posted by: crazyewok
Assad is brave a man. Talk like that will get a lot of "Freedom" launched and dropped on him.

Real brave using Sarin Gas on them babies.

originally posted by: TinfoilTP
LOL, "the obvious false flag chemical attack". Assad's propaganda replayed on ATS and across social media just like clockwork. There is a nefarious conspiracy alright, and it involves the dissemination of this garbage and who is behind it.

Assad and allies are banking on the Anti Trump sentiment which is why this snip gets regurgitated.

a reply to: TinfoilTP

I suppose you have 100 percent conclusive proof ?