It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TheScale
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: TheScale
originally posted by: amazing
It's likability.
Look at our last few presidents. Mostly likable. Not based on Policy but just on Charisma. People liked Obama, They liked Bush Jr, they Liked Bill Clinton, They liked Reagon, they liked Carter. Bush Sr and Trump are the anomalies, But Bush Sr, got in on the Tailcoat of Reagon and Trump was more likable than Hillary.
i think u could include obama in that list. he was a nobody with very lil experience.
I'm just talking about likability and Charisma. People liked him. Nobody liked Hillary. That's the point.
ah gotcha and agree. except for the fact that there is a large portion of people who do like what trump has to say. it was evident in his rallies leading up to him winning the election
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: TheScale
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: TheScale
originally posted by: amazing
It's likability.
Look at our last few presidents. Mostly likable. Not based on Policy but just on Charisma. People liked Obama, They liked Bush Jr, they Liked Bill Clinton, They liked Reagon, they liked Carter. Bush Sr and Trump are the anomalies, But Bush Sr, got in on the Tailcoat of Reagon and Trump was more likable than Hillary.
i think u could include obama in that list. he was a nobody with very lil experience.
I'm just talking about likability and Charisma. People liked him. Nobody liked Hillary. That's the point.
ah gotcha and agree. except for the fact that there is a large portion of people who do like what trump has to say. it was evident in his rallies leading up to him winning the election
And you're correct, except that I believe that if we had a really Charismatic opponent running against Trump he would have lost. Obama his first run vs Trump. That would have been something to see. Or someone like Bush Jr vs Trump in the primaries.
She’d been humiliated in the Michigan primary the night before, a loss that not only robbed her of a prime opportunity to put Bernie Sanders down for good but also exposed several of her weaknesses. How could she have been left so vulnerable? She knew — or at least she thought she did. The blame belonged to her campaign team, she believed, for failing to hone her message, energize important constituencies and take care of business in getting voters to the polls. And now, Jake Sullivan, her de facto chief strategist, was giving her lip about the last answer she’d delivered in the prep session.
“That’s not very good,” Sullivan corrected.
“Really?” Hillary snapped back.
The room fell silent.
“Why don’t you do it?”
The comment was pointed and sarcastic, but she meant it. So for the next 30 minutes, there he was, pretending to be Hillary while she critiqued his performance.
originally posted by: GokuVsSuperman0
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
Private email server? Deserves death...but cheating 1000s of dollars out of poor people in a fraudulent school is ok. I don't mind Trump supporters because he said a lot of Ron Paul like things that got people's attention, from anti-interventionism to states rights. But Trump supporters who think Clinton is some sort of ultimate evil that can't be compared to Trump should read something, anything. As long as it's not breitbart or infowars.
Ugh what does it say for Americans who believe in innocent till proven guilty, unless it's this woman. I'm not calling Trump a traitor or a criminal even though there are higher odds he's broken more laws than Clinton. Because I believe in the rule of law.
There are just SO many of you douches that label either Clinton as a criminal or Trump as a Russian traitor without ANYTHING but harsh words. I hate you all. Democrats and Republicans. Everything you said was just as good as some tabloid sh*t that morons read. Because facts matter, the law matters and ignoring it because it conflicts with your worldview is some childish a$s sh*t.
originally posted by: TheScale
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: TheScale
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: TheScale
originally posted by: amazing
It's likability.
Look at our last few presidents. Mostly likable. Not based on Policy but just on Charisma. People liked Obama, They liked Bush Jr, they Liked Bill Clinton, They liked Reagon, they liked Carter. Bush Sr and Trump are the anomalies, But Bush Sr, got in on the Tailcoat of Reagon and Trump was more likable than Hillary.
i think u could include obama in that list. he was a nobody with very lil experience.
I'm just talking about likability and Charisma. People liked him. Nobody liked Hillary. That's the point.
ah gotcha and agree. except for the fact that there is a large portion of people who do like what trump has to say. it was evident in his rallies leading up to him winning the election
And you're correct, except that I believe that if we had a really Charismatic opponent running against Trump he would have lost. Obama his first run vs Trump. That would have been something to see. Or someone like Bush Jr vs Trump in the primaries.
yup i wont disagree with u there. bernie may have been that guy. we just will never know now. it really bugs me that the left is letting the DNC off the hook for that.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Logarock
The only issue I'd have is with the term "liberals".
It's the leftists, the socialists that try to rewrite history and change definitions.
It can never be that most people reject their dictatorial brand of politics, it has to be the fault of stupid people.
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: TheScale
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: TheScale
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: TheScale
originally posted by: amazing
It's likability.
Look at our last few presidents. Mostly likable. Not based on Policy but just on Charisma. People liked Obama, They liked Bush Jr, they Liked Bill Clinton, They liked Reagon, they liked Carter. Bush Sr and Trump are the anomalies, But Bush Sr, got in on the Tailcoat of Reagon and Trump was more likable than Hillary.
i think u could include obama in that list. he was a nobody with very lil experience.
I'm just talking about likability and Charisma. People liked him. Nobody liked Hillary. That's the point.
ah gotcha and agree. except for the fact that there is a large portion of people who do like what trump has to say. it was evident in his rallies leading up to him winning the election
And you're correct, except that I believe that if we had a really Charismatic opponent running against Trump he would have lost. Obama his first run vs Trump. That would have been something to see. Or someone like Bush Jr vs Trump in the primaries.
yup i wont disagree with u there. bernie may have been that guy. we just will never know now. it really bugs me that the left is letting the DNC off the hook for that.
Yeah that bugs me too. Bugs me that Sanders is joining with them. I don't see democrats winning the next election unless they give us someone different.