What Really Happened To The 2016 US Election Who Did It, & Why

What Really Happened To The 2016 US Election Who Did It, & Why

In a nutshell the Democratic party lost the election because no one but fringe wing loons bought their propaganda.

Enter a manufactured villain Russia as a wag the dog because they were exposed for being the most corrupt party in American history.

The why is as simple. No one should be in power, but the democratic party.

They want a one party state.

originally posted by: ketsuko
Only in pointing out that we have the EC for a reason.

Didn't seem like it. You made it seem like the final tally doesn't count.

How you can look at the electoral map of counties and then say most Americans as though those tiny blue areas somehow deserve to rule all the rest of us is beyond me.

It's called population density. Maybe you and seasonal can form a study group.

Also, they don't rule anything. They have a vote, the same as everyone else.

California has its say with 55 electoral votes, and it wasn't enough to outweigh all the 3 vote states like Wyoming and others who did not want Hillary. Face it -- Americans did not want Hillary.

Actually the popular vote says that they did but the EC worked against that. That is why it even exists so why act like that isn't what happened.

a reply to: daskakik

Or you don't understand the electoral college. We both have so much learn'in to do.

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: digital01anarchy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: TobyFlenderson
I like the twist that I hadn't thought of, the DNC was hacked by Russian citizens working on their own to protect their country. That is very interesting to me.

Me too.


Putin clearly did not want Hillary in charge.

Da it would seem comrade that putin has the same mindset as most americans considering hillary lost the election!

Most voters voted for Hillary.

California voted for Hillary. Up until the popular California returns came in, the popular vote was Trump's as well.

MOST. Do you understand the word MOST.

Hillary got MOST votes - - the Popular vote.

DO NOT respond with the Electoral college.

Does anyone have anything to say about the actual information posted? Or does who did it and why not count.

There were no good words about Trump but the collective group saw him as an opportunity to wreck havoc on the deep state.

Anyone read the article?

a reply to: Annee

Would it be safe to say Trump won the electoral vote and Hillary won the popular vote?

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Annee

Would it be safe to say Trump won the electoral vote and Hillary won the popular vote?

Yeah, and as everyone knows.

The ec vote determines our election.

The reason it was created to begin with.

originally posted by: seasonal
Or you don't understand the electoral college. We both have so much learn'in to do.

I understand it just fine. It balances things out so that less populated states have more even representation in the election.

It can override the popular vote so why do you act like saying so is wrong?

a reply to: daskakik

It is not wrong.

originally posted by: seasonal
It is not wrong.

You sure seem to have a problem with someone saying "Most voters voted for Hillary."

Why do you act like saying that is wrong?

a reply to: daskakik

It's a fact, I don't argue with facts.

a reply to: seasonal

Yet you felt compelled to post a map which argues that fact?

a reply to: daskakik

Because most people don't vote to begin with.

And most people did not vote for Clinton.

Another reason the EC was created.

a reply to: neo96

Makes no difference. Of those that did vote the majority voted for Clinton.

The EC offsets the popular vote but it doesn't change that fact.

a reply to: daskakik

Now your trying to have it both ways.

Russia hacked the election. Therefore Clinton 'won' the popular vote.

And considering in California more people voted for CLinton than Obama that was more liked.

The popular vote is meaningless on so many levels when the popular vote is suspect.

When the democratic primary was rigged.

a reply to: daskakik

No a map does not argue anything. It is a map that shows who and where.

a reply to: liveandlearn

Who cares? What this boils down to is dems ring super upset that they got caught. Have they apologised or changed their ways? Nope. They just vow to not stop spending your money until they find out who did it. Did Russia hack the ballots? Nope. So who cares? Its well documented that the Dems tried their best to rig the election, through their own primaries, being fed debated questions, colluding with the media, etc. And the problem is that someone else pointed this out? Get real. Who cares who it was?

a reply to: neo96

I never said anything other than clinton got more individual votes.

No seeing your alleged other way.

a reply to: daskakik

Not in the electoral college.

originally posted by: dfnj2015
Forget Trump, this one bothers me more:

"So why then does the media or anyone for that matter refuse to acknowledge most of Hillary’s primaries and caucuses she has won against Sanders have all had voting anomalies?

Numbers that don’t match up, time and time again in the exit polls as investigator Richard Charin has found the poll’s don’t match up some by a whopping 10% or more."

Why even have democracy. Maybe it's time to switch to a STRONG right wing military style dictatorship.

The only thing those emails revealed was the corruption within the democratic party which had no bearing because We already knew they were corrupt.