Russia Gate! Spy Gate! Oh me! Oh my!

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Boadicea

Can she take the fifth?, I don't think she can because she is on record, lying.

Yes, she can. It doesn't matter to a court (or congressional hearing) what she said on the news, when she was not under oath. Even then, she could still plead the 5th. It would discredit her personally and her testimony among many, both those on the Intel Committee and those of us in the court of public opinion.

But she has every right to do so.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Boadicea

Can she take the fifth?, I don't think she can because she is on record, lying.

She can.
I am going out on a limb and say that she will.
Lyong on a TV show is one thing. Lying under oath is another.

originally posted by: The GUT
Hey thanks, I've been busy today and catching snippets and just got a chance to catch up and you have it all laid out. Wowzer!!

Glad you got caught up! I posted a few more, and still have more to post. So check back later if you need to get caught up again!

Darn that is no good, I will love to see somebody tearing new one on that woman.

I don't get it, what is the used of inquiries and committees if those that are been investigated and questioned get to plead the fifth and go back to their lying lies in politics.

a reply to: butcherguy

She can.
I am going out on a limb and say that she will.
Lyong on a TV show is one thing. Lying under oath is another.

Thanks -- that's how I understand it too.

I think she'll take the 5th as well, if for no other reason than her attorney will advise her so. But it wouldn't surprise me if she did testify and testifies that she requested unmasking, but did not leak anyones name -- and she may even be telling the truth. She may have let others do her dirty work for her.

We'll see what happens.

originally posted by: marg6043
Darn that is no good, I will love to see somebody tearing new one on that woman.

You aren't the only one! Give it time. Let's see what happens. Even if she doesn't testify, maybe others will and be quite happy to sing like canaries. The truth always comes out, sooner or later, one way or another.

I don't get it, what is the used of inquiries and committees if those that are been investigated and questioned get to plead the fifth and go back to their lying lies in politics.

In theory, by pleading the 5th -- and especially to such a serious crime involving the public's trust -- she would so discredit herself that the voting public itself would keep her out of politics by refusing to vote her into office and/or any elected official that would hire her.

The House Intelligence Committee does have other tools and tactics at their disposal though. They could strike a plea deal with someone else in the intelligence agencies who is privvy to all the whys and wherefores, perhaps including immunity or just a lighter sentence for their own transgressions.

Hopefully we will see the House Intelligence Committee conduct a proper investigation, with proper evidence and witnesses, and ultimately proper charges for the guilty... whoever they may be.

We're just going to have to watch and see how this plays out.

At least the intelligence committee is willing to investigate and call her, that out to make the ones under her that had anything to do with what she is suspected of doing get all worry.

And the intelligence committee can not link Trump to any collision yet, no matter how much they are trying.

Boadicea have you heard of this person, CrowdStrike’s CTO and cofounder, Dmitri Alperovitch

artvoice.com...

Is worth to read the article, maybe you can find something, it has a time line at the end.

originally posted by: marg6043
At least the intelligence committee is willing to investigate and call her, that out to make the ones under her that had anything to do with what she is suspected of doing get all worry.

And the intelligence committee can not link Trump to any collision yet, no matter how much they are trying.

There ya go! That's the spirit

originally posted by: marg6043
Boadicea have you heard of this person, CrowdStrike’s CTO and cofounder, Dmitri Alperovitch

artvoice.com...

Is worth to read the article, maybe you can find something, it has a time line at the end.

It's definitely worth the read -- thanks! That's a lot of information. I'm going to update the timeline I did earlier with the latest events, and then go over this article again. There are definitely plenty of double standards, shall we say?

Now I want to read part 1 and 2...

Thanks again!

Susan Rice's Unraveling Web of Lies
Obama's attack on our democracy becomes too clear to ignore.

Michael Doran, former National Security Council senior director, told the Daily Caller that “somebody blew a hole in the wall between national security secrets and partisan politics.” This “was a stream of information that was supposed to be hermetically sealed from politics and the Obama administration found a way to blow a hole in that wall,” he said.

www.frontpagemag.com...

More updates and other info:

Attkisson v. Eric Holder, Department of Justice, et al

This isn't about Russiagate or Spygate; just about government spying. With lots of details on how. Thought it was worth posting if for no other reason than to show a pattern...
----------------------------------

Hillary Clinton’s astonishing post-State access to top secret docs

Again, this one isn't about Spygate, but it did occur to me that if Hillary and her minions could retain their security clearances AND access to classified info, perhaps that's how Evelyn Farkas knew what was going on in the intel agencies even after her departure.
-----------------------------------

Susan Rice Is Not Trusted In Washington – I Predict She Is Charged With Espionage.

So this one is about Spygate, or more specifically about Susan Rice. I post it because it makes a very good point: While Rice and other Obama officials are sweating this out, Obama's hiding on a tropical island with no extradition pact, and letting those who served him take all the heat. What a freaking coward.

a reply to: Boadicea

Is interesting to see that once you try to post on the realities of Susan Rice debacle and the facts of what her job allows her to do or not and how much she extended her powers, people don't want to hear about it.

They are fix on what the media tells them, like CNN that do not wants to hear of Susan over extension of powers, they will fall flat on their butts that she did what she did within her reach.

But, her jobs specifications says different.

originally posted by: Boadicea
More updates and other info:

Attkisson v. Eric Holder, Department of Justice, et al

This isn't about Russiagate or Spygate; just about government spying. With lots of details on how. Thought it was worth posting if for no other reason than to show a pattern...
----------------------------------

Hillary Clinton’s astonishing post-State access to top secret docs

Again, this one isn't about Spygate, but it did occur to me that if Hillary and her minions could retain their security clearances AND access to classified info, perhaps that's how Evelyn Farkas knew what was going on in the intel agencies even after her departure.
-----------------------------------

Susan Rice Is Not Trusted In Washington – I Predict She Is Charged With Espionage.

So this one is about Spygate, or more specifically about Susan Rice. I post it because it makes a very good point: While Rice and other Obama officials are sweating this out, Obama's hiding on a tropical island with no extradition pact, and letting those who served him take all the heat. What a freaking coward.

From your link:

Blackburn said:  “And now you can look at this.  And she used a double negative, “I didn’t say nothing to nobody. That means she gave something to somebody. 

I didn't notice the double negative thing before.
Interesting.