It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Mr Schiff said in a statement that the panel would discuss any such request with the Justice Department and the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Mr Flynn's step was "grave and momentous", he added.
The California Democrat also said: "As with any investigation - and particularly one that grows in severity and
magnitude by the day - there is still much work and many more witnesses and documents to obtain before any immunity request from any witness can be considered."
Why immunity? Anthony Zurcher, BBC News, Washington
Michael Flynn may have a "story to tell", but what it is at this point is anybody's guess.
Donald Trump's critics will probably imagine grand revelations of possible campaign contacts with Russian operatives or even the "c" word - collusion.
Beyond the news reports of ongoing conversations between Flynn's lawyer and federal investigators, however, there is no firm ground for such speculation.
It's entirely possible the immunity request is nothing more than the former senior Trump adviser attempting to insulate himself from legal trouble if he were to answer detailed questions about his foreign contacts and lobbying efforts. For instance, if he actively represented overseas interests, he may have run afoul of federal disclosure rules. There's also the chance that Flynn could be uneasy about what he told FBI agents in January, when they asked about his conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak.
Either of those possibilities would be of great concern to Mr Flynn, who has a six-figure military pension to preserve, but it wouldn't be the kind of political bombshell that would directly threaten Mr Trump or his administration.
US intelligence officials had serious concerns about Michael Flynn’s appointment as the White House national security adviser because of his history of contacts with Moscow and his encounter with a woman who had trusted access to Russian spy agency records, the Guardian has learned.
US and British intelligence officers discussed Flynn’s “worrisome” behaviour well before his appointment last year by Donald Trump, multiple sources have said.
They raised concerns about Flynn’s ties to Russia and his perceived obsession with Iran.
They were also anxious about his capacity for “linear thought” and some actions that were regarded as highly unusual for a three-star general.
originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: alphabetaone
Notice how no powerful Republicans are committing to defending Trump.
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Indigo5
The 500,000 thousand dollar that his firm took from Turkey and the specifics about it.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Olivine
If necessary the justice department can prosecute Flynn regardless of his immunity status with Congress.
Immunity from congress and justice are the same thing...
That's just the way the law works.
That is why Congress affords justice a first opinion on whether immunity is granted...because if they grant immunity, it could invalidate an ongoing investigation.
Your post seems exactly wrong?
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Olivine
If necessary the justice department can prosecute Flynn regardless of his immunity status with Congress.
Immunity from congress and justice are the same thing...
That's just the way the law works.
That is why Congress affords justice a first opinion on whether immunity is granted...because if they grant immunity, it could invalidate an ongoing investigation.
Your post seems exactly wrong?
Okay, so you're saying immunity is an umbrella that covers everything and the legal expert on Fox news says that immunity with Congress is not the same thing as immunity from being prosecuted by the Department of Justice. Since I am not an attorney, will just leave it at that.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Olivine
If necessary the justice department can prosecute Flynn regardless of his immunity status with Congress.
Immunity from congress and justice are the same thing...
That's just the way the law works.
That is why Congress affords justice a first opinion on whether immunity is granted...because if they grant immunity, it could invalidate an ongoing investigation.
Your post seems exactly wrong?
Okay, so you're saying immunity is an umbrella that covers everything and the legal expert on Fox news says that immunity with Congress is not the same thing as immunity from being prosecuted by the Department of Justice. Since I am not an attorney, will just leave it at that.
originally posted by: fencesitter85
Man it's getting tougher by the day for the cult to defend this whole thing isn't it.
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: DJW001
Yep, deflect because you can not answer the question.
Thanks for playing!
I repeat: He admits to having been an unregistered foreign agent, lied about his contacts with Russian officials, and was probably one of the staffers whose communication with Russians was intercepted.
Who is deflecting now?
originally posted by: TheScale
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: DJW001
Yep, deflect because you can not answer the question.
Thanks for playing!
I repeat: He admits to having been an unregistered foreign agent, lied about his contacts with Russian officials, and was probably one of the staffers whose communication with Russians was intercepted.
Who is deflecting now?
same thing with podesta aswell. im surprised the story hasent made it to the front page of ATS with the fervor. a whole $35million in assets
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: TheScale
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: DJW001
Yep, deflect because you can not answer the question.
Thanks for playing!
I repeat: He admits to having been an unregistered foreign agent, lied about his contacts with Russian officials, and was probably one of the staffers whose communication with Russians was intercepted.
Who is deflecting now?
same thing with podesta aswell. im surprised the story hasent made it to the front page of ATS with the fervor. a whole $35million in assets
The problem with that is it is a story built out of cow-patties.
The gamble that political leaning makes people stupid is expiring...little by little..
originally posted by: Damiel
Adam Schiff has just said Flynns move is Momentus
Mr Schiff said in a statement that the panel would discuss any such request with the Justice Department and the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Mr Flynn's step was "grave and momentous", he added.
The California Democrat also said: "As with any investigation - and particularly one that grows in severity and
magnitude by the day - there is still much work and many more witnesses and documents to obtain before any immunity request from any witness can be considered."
Same article, but an "opinion" aside ok ? - read and contemplate for 2 minutes, seriously
Why immunity? Anthony Zurcher, BBC News, Washington
Michael Flynn may have a "story to tell", but what it is at this point is anybody's guess.
Donald Trump's critics will probably imagine grand revelations of possible campaign contacts with Russian operatives or even the "c" word - collusion.
Beyond the news reports of ongoing conversations between Flynn's lawyer and federal investigators, however, there is no firm ground for such speculation.
It's entirely possible the immunity request is nothing more than the former senior Trump adviser attempting to insulate himself from legal trouble if he were to answer detailed questions about his foreign contacts and lobbying efforts. For instance, if he actively represented overseas interests, he may have run afoul of federal disclosure rules. There's also the chance that Flynn could be uneasy about what he told FBI agents in January, when they asked about his conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak.
Either of those possibilities would be of great concern to Mr Flynn, who has a six-figure military pension to preserve, but it wouldn't be the kind of political bombshell that would directly threaten Mr Trump or his administration.
Flynn, then, is willing to be
the biggest, ever, whistleblower
....
Given that he is/was a hugely important part of Intel
He must be privy to a ton of 'things'
very smelly, laundry duds type things
He'll need serious protection, no ?
But the an idea hit me - deflection !
*Ats is a conspiracy site, right ?*
Michael Flynn testifies before however many hearings
doesn't say much, can't incriminate any one too much
pretty steadfast, whilst we're all on hand-bagin' each other
Because he knows he's beiong set up (in a sense)
What he knows or says
will be checked and re-checked
by the very services he used to run
He knows he can't lie
read this :
US intelligence officials had serious concerns about Michael Flynn’s appointment as the White House national security adviser because of his history of contacts with Moscow and his encounter with a woman who had trusted access to Russian spy agency records, the Guardian has learned.
US and British intelligence officers discussed Flynn’s “worrisome” behaviour well before his appointment last year by Donald Trump, multiple sources have said.
They raised concerns about Flynn’s ties to Russia and his perceived obsession with Iran.
They were also anxious about his capacity for “linear thought” and some actions that were regarded as highly unusual for a three-star general.
If you were to read to the end of the artice (and this could just be me)
Flynn could feasibly state that he was almost, very seriously, turned ...
turned by the oldest trick in the book : The honeypot
.. aside from having to explain the whole 'set up'
how the 'sevices' work and what they do
too a bunch of dorks ...
I'll bet a lot of what he would have to say
shouldn't be heard in public,
noooo plug your ears
For common sense reasons...
But we (me too) will all cry scandal !!
Whereas Flynn
could be tainted by the whiff of a True Patriot(tm)
and perhaps not so unreasonably so
originally posted by: chaeone86
a reply to: Gryphon66
Wait for the flood of elementary school drop outs with crushes on trump to rationalize some angle to this news.
In the mean time, we should all be starring and flagging this up to the top.
time ATS does what ATS does best: question all authority. Not just the left nor right. But all. That's how I was brought into the fold of this site, came back after an 8 year break. It was a joke from its former self. A group of mudslingers with no intention other than to beat their opposition and pester any dissent with child like taunts and illogical, useless rhetoric.