NBC News: Hillary Clinton ‘Covered Up’ Pedophile Ring At State Department

a reply to: Gryphon66
Sorry I was responding to you when you wrote:

Precisely zero respondents in this or any other thread claim there's no organized sex trafficking of both children and adults.

Because my post shows that this statement is wrong.

a reply to: shawmanfromny

This video you posted is from June 11, 2013.

Is there some new news on this. Today is March 28, 2017?

originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
a reply to: Gryphon66

My political agenda? Lol

We've been through this before. It's as easy as clicking on my name and spending 30 seconds to realize I have NO agenda.

But you on the other hand, spend 247 dealing in partisan debate. Who has an agenda?

And as for the topic, it was news to me and I'm sure news to many others. It seems new things pop up daily only adding more credence to my belief.

But anyways have a good day.

Sure, sure, you have no agenda that you're willing to own up to, but your posts speak for themselves.

I spend my time correcting partisan lies. I didn't know you were a fan.

It was news to you to have this dredged up when it was resolved four years ago? Did you do any research to discern the truth before chiming in that this supported absurd posts in another thread?

There was nothing in 2013 that suggested that Hillary Clinton was involved with any "coverup" or that a "coverup" really existed. There are links provided here that give the actual story.

The title and the OP are hyper-partisan click-bait.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Desperate to distract from the fact that the OP is chock full of fake news?

is it ?

Because Psaki says so ?

let me redirect you to my previous post...

You poor naive souls

a reply to: Irishhaf

All part of the agenda.

"The U.S. Cardinals politicians said they are going to develop a code of ethics to help them deal with the sexual scandal. Wait a minute, I thought there already was a code of ethics, it's called the Bible Law." —Jay Leno

"As you've probably heard, the Pope Trump has asked all the Cardinals of Obama's ambassadors to return to Rome DC. You know how they got them all to come back? They told them that there was going to be a performance by the Vienna Boys Choir at Pizza Hut." —Jay Leno

"They say the Pledge of Allegiance violates the separation of church and state. How about the separation of church state and altar boy pizzeria? That's what I'm worried about." —Jay Leno

"Cardinal Law Bill Clinton had difficulty with his memory under oath today. He could only remember three commandments. Under oath, Cardinal Law Bill Clinton said 'I do not recall' 43 times. I'm telling you, this guy is presidential material." —David Letterman

"The House Transportation Committee State Department is now considering a bill that would allow pilotsto carry guns for protection. I've got a better idea, why not give guns to altar boys underage pizza delivery boys , give them a fighting chance." —Jay Leno

"The Catholic Church Domino's Pizza has just opened a new $2 million cathedral restaurant in Los Angeles. They really spared no expense. Each confessional pizza box has a panic button in it." —David Letterman

"The Church State Dept. is reaffirming celibacy — it's kind of like Clinton reaffirming monogamy." —Jay Leno

"This is the last Take Your Daughter to Work Day. Next year, boys will be involved too. I guess the church Podesta lobbied pretty hard on that one." —Jay Leno

"Pope Trump has called all the U.S. cardinals ambassadors back to the Vatican DC. He's going to have Italy's top soccer coach talk to them. I believe the topic is how to do your job without using your hands 'eating pizza'." —Jay Leno

"Today the Catholic Church State Department unveiled its new policy. Don't ask, don't confess because we'll never tell." —Jay Leno

"Isn't it crazy with all these church scandals? I'm beginning to understand how all those Bibles ended up in hotel rooms." —Jay Leno
(I had to leave this one intact LOL!)

"This week hundreds of bishops policy makers arrived in Dallas for their annual convention. You know what that means? Party. Party. Party. Party, Pizza Pizza Party. A couple of bellboys are being carried over the threshold tonight." —Jay Leno

"There is a big conference of Catholic Bishops political convention in Dallas. Well this is great for the city, it brings in about $12 million in hush money." —David Letterman

"The Supreme Court ruled today that virtual child pornography is legal. Finally, some good news for the church State Department." —Jay Leno

"Kids, if you see an ad that says Cardinals politicians looking for a bat boy, watch out, that has nothing to do with the baseball team." —Jay Leno

originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
a reply to: Gryphon66

Honest question, if this entire "scandal" was focused around Trump and his folks, how would you feel about it?

We all know that he would be on his 27th thread on the subject and boiling over with vitriol.

a reply to: MarioOnTheFly

No, it is because based on all the facts we have there's no connection between reports of a diplomat's alleged behavior in 2013, Hillary Clinton and any of the wild, fringe theories about Italian pies.

originally posted by: ParasuvO

originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
a reply to: Gryphon66

Honest question, if this entire "scandal" was focused around Trump and his folks, how would you feel about it?

We all know that he would be on his 27th thread on the subject and boiling over with vitriol.

Gosh, so many fans, so little interest.

Have anything on the actual topic? You know, the ridiculous assertion that 4 year old news has something to do with anything current? Or how about the utter misrepresentation of the topic?

Naaah. Those are all okie-dokie, eh?

Pffft.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Impressive use of strikethrough.

Anything to do with the topic?

originally posted by: flatbush71
Gentlemen, I've been dropping bread crumbs for a year now.

Everything in due course.

I will iterate one more time, this is a all out war within the beltway.

Buck

Alex? Is that you? Interdimensional vampires say what?

originally posted by: lostbook
a reply to: shawmanfromny

Maybe she IS guilty. However, I don't understand why people say "fake news" when the reporting is against Trump but then agree with news when it's against Clinton.

Because of the tone...because of the cherry picking of "facts" because of the hate pouring off of the announcers...and because we see a definitive programming in the culture of the news...corporate response..and the always Trump is guilty before proven innocent...

originally posted by: Shamrock6

originally posted by: flatbush71
Gentlemen, I've been dropping bread crumbs for a year now.

Everything in due course.

I will iterate one more time, this is a all out war within the beltway.

Buck

Alex? Is that you? Interdimensional vampires say what?

What?

originally posted by: dashen

originally posted by: Shamrock6

originally posted by: flatbush71
Gentlemen, I've been dropping bread crumbs for a year now.

Everything in due course.

I will iterate one more time, this is a all out war within the beltway.

Buck

Alex? Is that you? Interdimensional vampires say what?

What?

Lol well played, sir.

a reply to: Gryphon66

No, it is because based on all the facts we have there's no connection between reports of a diplomat's alleged behavior in 2013, Hillary Clinton and any of the wild, fringe theories about Italian pies.

you know what's amazing about human beings..two can look at same piece of paper...and have different perceptions about it's content, and ultimately different conclusions. It amazes me truly.

ATS is such a great reminder of that.

a reply to: MarioOnTheFly

Sure. Everyone has different opinions and perceptions.

But the facts here are plain. OP cited material that is moving through the right-wing blog-sphere in the last two days which is dredging up nonsense from 4 years ago and trying to attach it to Hillary Clinton ... to what end aside from obvious success in rousing the base, who can say?

People are SO quick to accept anything and everything reported about Clinton or Democrats but it's like pulling teeth when it comes to accepting anything reported about Trump.

What ever happened to that thread about "proof" being presented at the end of last week of Obama wiretapping Trump? People were so sure it was true yet nothing ever materialized.

Funny how that works.

originally posted by: chiefsmom
a reply to: Gryphon66
Ok, I just looked more into this.

Maybe that is why it is being brought back up?

Because the whole issue that was ACTUALLY reported, (shocking) WAS completely swept under the rug at the time?

Or perhaps there was not much to the story to begin with...