It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OrbitalDecay
originally posted by: tigertatzen
I suppose that could be a possible scenario, but something tells me that such a vessel wouldn't have the need to escape from anyone. It can slowly rise out of the water without so much as a drip and completely silent, then accelerate in less than a second's time fast enough to disappear entirely from view, but it has to run away from subs or torpedoes?
I totally agree with you, so perhaps it was being chased by something other than subs and torpedoes?
A craft of similar capabilities from another faction? Or they weren't being chased by anyone and just felt like showing off.
But my guess is as good as anyone's, and there are perhaps benevolent "visitors" but altruism isnot high on my list of "visitor" virtues.
My apologies if I take a negative view of the subject and often my wording can be not as gentle as it should be.
originally posted by: myss427
a reply to: Soloprotocol
Well the F117 Night Hawk was secret for well over a decade before it came into the white world, and the Military has many black projects from the 70's they still have not declassified, so why do you think they would openly show this one if its way more advanced?
originally posted by: frenchfries
a reply to: Phage
But that doesn't mean there is nothing out there , it just means the existence of UFOS is denied and ridiculed on so many levels that ufology has become obsolete.
originally posted by: tigertatzen
a reply to: roadgravel
... If it is in fact non-terrestrial, then would it be safe to assume our military is OK with that?
originally posted by: roadgravel
originally posted by: tigertatzen
a reply to: roadgravel
... If it is in fact non-terrestrial, then would it be safe to assume our military is OK with that?
The military might have no choice. In other words, they may not like it but can do nothing about it.
originally posted by: mikell
Sight over water. I'm 55 miles east of Chicago and can see several buildings a few times a month when conditions are just right. my house is about 20 feet above the lake. 80 Miles things would be real small and hard to tell what you saw.
I'll give it a maybe possible because of what I can see when conditions are right
originally posted by: roadgravel
originally posted by: tigertatzen
a reply to: roadgravel
... If it is in fact non-terrestrial, then would it be safe to assume our military is OK with that?
The military might have no choice. In other words, they may not like it but can do nothing about it.
We're talking about a much simpler concept: people on shore (very close to sea level) supposedly being able to see something that's also very close to sea level (40 feet above the water) at a distance of 80 miles. It would be mathematically impossible. The curve of the earth would prevent it.
originally posted by: roadgravel
I would imagine a company with 500m to several billion dollars invested in an drill ship, rig or platform wouldn't be concerned about it being lost due to consumer grade electronics.
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: tigertatzen
Could be related to the overall shape of the craft and the viewing angle.
The b2 from the side looks like a tear drop.