It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ColdWisdom
I am skeptical, actually. I consider the possibility and the ramifications.
While not being privy to the actual evidence, I don't take the fact there there is an investigation lightly. Gowdy, doesn't seem to be concerned about that aspect.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust
Nevermind that members of Trump's campaign may have been dealing with the Russians.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Azureblue
To public knowledge, circumstantial. And don't make the layman's mistake of thinking that means inconsequential. It is certainly sufficient to warrant investigation.
What exactly is the evidence of this claim?
Did you watch the hearing? Did you hear the timeline of events provided by Shiff?
Wow. Quoting ShariaBlue. Are you one of Brock's trolls and is he still paying you since his heart attack?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Doctor Smith
Straw man argument. I did not say I think Trump dealt with the Russians.
The case against Trump.
However, there is the timeline provided by Shiff at the hearing, concerning members of Trump's campaign. Did you miss it?
shareblue.com...
As far as evidence goes, we, the general public, won't have much of that until the investigation itself reaches a conclusion. As it should be.