The BBC is blatantly "Race Baiting" on its site.

a reply to: uncommitted

Just be thankful Jimmy Savile did not fix it for you.

Unsubstantiated???

en.wikipedia.org...

Generally there is no smoke without fire.

But you cant teach pork.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: uncommitted

Just be thankful Jimmy Savile did not fix it for you.

Unsubstantiated???

en.wikipedia.org...

Generally there is no smoke without fire.

But you cant teach pork.

There is often smoke without fire (apparently Trump didn't mean he was literally being wiretapped by Obama, or that he was wiretapped by anybody), and there is history of abuse in many lines of work - from social care to schools to the various churches to children groups. All of them despicable, why you think the BBC is significantly 'worse' is up to you.

I'm not sure what you mean by the pork comment, I imagine you think it's some smart point.

a reply to: uncommitted

I don't think the BBC are significantly worse, but i do think they are in a position of power which carries with it a modicum of responsibility.

Enabling celebrity sex criminals and/or attempting to cover up there acts of depravity is belligerent and diabolical. The people responsible should be held to account.

All pedophilia and sex crimes are despicable, that stands to simple reason.

However when the people responsible for the creation/reporting of the NEWS and other TV broadcasts of the nation are up to there neck or at least complicit in the matter something is very, very wrong.