Voynich Glyph's actualy represent numbers

Have a look at this cipher I created. I designated each glyph as a letter which also represents a number. What you do is swap out the letters for the glyph's in a voynich word then add up its number value. Then the corresponding word number represents a word. So check out how I ciphered this folio 67r2. I found my cipher by using the chives in f99r which equals the same glyph's as fishes and that is how I went about creating the cipher

www.jasondavies.com.../0.5/0.5/2.50

Here is the f1r




voynichgematria.wordpress.com...

a reply to: fema1

So, what is the overall purpose of the manuscript?

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: fema1

So, what is the overall purpose of the manuscript?

I believe that its political and has some plant remedies if you can read the water lily folio its in Chaucer Middle English. Also the Author was into tracking the stars! There are many folios which I have not decoded yet but read this link its a shocker.

f58r

a reply to: fema1

That's pretty cool.
But why is the row 7 empty? And since the manuscript doesn't have any corrections and there is almost no repetition of "words" I believe it is far fetched to assume it could be that easily translated into English. Or Latin.
Besides I believe 3 of these symbols are the same, just with a sloppy bow. And the three things which almost look like 2s might be just one too and we're looking at something without vowels.
Besides I feel you'd have to find a way to recreate the template.

originally posted by: fema1

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: fema1

So, what is the overall purpose of the manuscript?

I believe that its political and has some plant remedies if you can read the water lily folio its in Chaucer Middle English. Also the Author was into tracking the stars! There are many folios which I have not decoded yet but read this link its a shocker.

voynichgematria.files.wordpress.com... gic-of-vms.pdf

Link 404'd.
The translated section example...seems like an executioner's manual or law book.

a reply to: Peeple

I don't understand can you elaborate on row 7?

a reply to: IAMTAT

sorry try inner linking from my cite.

its named:

syntax-and-logic-of-vms f58r

Here is a try again:
f58r

a reply to: fema1

In your gematria, there are no symbols under the 7. Why is that?

a reply to: Peeple

Thats because the i and j share the bench gallows and thats just how it worked out odd I know

Truly fascinating.

Isn't there an award being offered for a successful translation?

a reply to: IAMTAT

There is a great deal of Academic Politics in this subject matter and Stephen Bax and Nick Pelling just ignore me as-well as Rene Zandberrg. I do have a copyrighted book so it will be a matter of time. Thank you!

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: fema1

In your gematria, there are no symbols under the 7. Why is that?

Religious reasons?
The 7th. day is the Lord's day?

a reply to: IAMTAT

Huh, interesting thought. And if it really worked out that way because of the j&I it adds to the mystery.

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: IAMTAT

Huh, interesting thought. And if it really worked out that way because of the j&I it adds to the mystery.

Jehovah & Iehovah...
Both 7 letters, too.

a reply to: fema1

Just read the pdf and it seems like you're really on to something.
How awesome is that!?
& to you!

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: IAMTAT

Huh, interesting thought. And if it really worked out that way because of the j&I it adds to the mystery.

Jehovah & Iehovah...
Both 7 letters, too.

Gabriel

Michael

Gavreel

Cassiel

Satanic

Seven letters too,WOWOW

Gandalf woopdy


hey try this

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Clue - 8 Letters Bovine excrement

I read the pdf and understood this will not be the last we hear from you.
Heated debate in akademica is what i expect to see.
Great work.

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: fema1

That's pretty cool.
But why is the row 7 empty? And since the manuscript doesn't have any corrections and there is almost no repetition of "words" I believe it is far fetched to assume it could be that easily translated into English. Or Latin.

Agreed. I looked at the word "Kingdom" which appears twice in the Old English version... but the Voynich words aren't the same. Then I looked at the gematric number (49) that was associated with "kingdom" and there are five of those the other three are not "kingdom" and none of the words have the same meaning.

I doubt that any scholar would accept that.

originally posted by: Norge
I read the pdf and understood this will not be the last we hear from you.
Heated debate in akademica is what i expect to see.

Great work.

I don't see any debate in academia at this point. The results don't seem replicable and they aren't consistent.

You had another account at one time did you not?