It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Perpetually raging about the world's injustices? You're probably overcompensating.
To test this guilt-to-outrage-to-moral-reaffirmation premise, Rothschild and Keefer conducted five separate studies assessing the relationships between anger, empathy, identity, individual and collective guilt, self perception, and the expression of moral outrage.
Ultimately, the results of Rothschild and Keefer's five studies were "consistent with recent research showing that outgroup-directed moral outrage can be elicited in response to perceived threats to the ingroup's moral status," write the authors. The findings also suggest that "outrage driven by moral identity concerns serves to compensate for the threat of personal or collective immorality" and the cognitive dissonance that it might elicit, and expose a "link between guilt and self-serving expressions of outrage that reflect a kind of 'moral hypocrisy,' or at least a non-moral form of anger with a moral facade."
originally posted by: TheBulk
You don't really need a study to come to this conclusion. One of the big clues for me is how inconsistent the morally outraged always are. For example, they rage about racism and then in the same breath broadly generalize and demonize white people.
originally posted by: TheBulk
You don't really need a study to come to this conclusion. One of the big clues for me is how inconsistent the morally outraged always are. For example, they rage about racism and then in the same breath broadly generalize and demonize white people.