It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If we want some sort of pattern that carries information about our living cells to persist then we must specify precisely what medium carries that pattern and how it interacts with the matter particles out of which our bodies are made. We must, in other words, invent an extension to the Standard Model of Particle Physics that has escaped detection at the Large Hadron Collider. That’s almost inconceivable at the energy scales typical of the particle interactions in our bodies.
Cox’s point relies heavily on the LHC’s ability to pick up the tiniest bursts of energy found in particle collisions. That mean that any energy signatures from paranormal entities should be easy to detect. Thus far, no such evidence has been found.
"Before we ask the first question, I want to make a statement: We are not here to debate the existence of ghosts because they don't exist. If we want some sort of pattern that carries information about our living cells to persist then we must specify precisely what medium carries that pattern and how it interacts with the matter particles out of which our bodies are made. We must, in other words, invent an extension to the Standard Model of Particle Physics that has escaped detection at the Large Hadron Collider. That's almost inconceivable at the energy scales typical of the particle interactions in our bodies. I would say if there's some kind of substance that's driving our bodies, making my arms move and legs move, then it must interact with the particles out of which our bodies are made. And seeing as we've made high precision measurements of the ways that particles interact, then my assertion is there can be no such thing as an energy source that's driving our bodies."
"To accept the existence of ghosts requires the rewriting of all of the above laws and theories of physics, does that mean that we should stop looking? Not necessarily, but believers must accept that a high standard of evidence is required to start rewriting the textbooks."
originally posted by: jtrenthacker
a reply to: khnum
They are not looking for "ghosts" in the LHC. From what I'm gathering, they are proving that there is no way ghost could exist from what they have learned about particles.
originally posted by: SaturnFX
This is nonsense. paranormal is a big field first off, but the main component is that it is outside of our scientific measurements (at the moment)..so studying deeper into our current understanding isn't the right area to explore things outside of our scope (dimension perhaps, etc).
Its like someone studying a lake really intensely and concluding there are no aliens visiting earth because no matter how closely they look at the lake, they see no ufos.
originally posted by: jtrenthacker
a reply to: khnum
They are not looking for "ghosts" in the LHC. From what I'm gathering, they are proving that there is no way a ghost could exist from what they have learned about particles.
any energy signatures from paranormal entities should be easy to detect
Argument from ignorance (from Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proved false (or vice versa). This represents a type of false dichotomy in that it excludes a third option, which is that: there may have been an insufficient investigation, and therefore there is insufficient information to prove the proposition be either true or false. Nor does it allow the admission that the choices may in fact not be two (true or false), but may be as many as four,
true
false
unknown between true or false
being unknowable (among the first three).[1]
In debates, appeals to ignorance are sometimes used in an attempt to shift the burden of proof.
originally posted by: scojak
Perhaps they should replicate MacDougall's "21 grams experiment" inside the LHC.
If, at the time of death, the LHC does not pick up any energy leaving the body, then that means there is a full 21 grams that the LHC cannot detect. That's an awful lot of particles...