It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
'Scorpion' robot mission inside Fukushima reactor aborted
A "scorpion" robot sent into a Japanese nuclear reactor to learn about the damage suffered in a tsunami-induced meltdown had its mission aborted after the probe ran into trouble, Tokyo Electric Power company said Thursday.
TEPCO, the operator of the Fukushima nuclear plant, sent the remote-controlled device into the No. 2 reactor where radiation levels have recently hit record highs.
...
But it could not reach its target destination beneath a pressure vessel through which nuclear fuel is believed to have melted because the robot had difficulty moving, a company spokeswoman said.
"It's not immediately clear if that's because of radiation or obstacles," she said, adding that TEPCO is checking what data the robot was able to obtain, including images.
The operator of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant said Thursday its attempt to retrieve data from a robot from inside the No. 2 reactor had failed possibly due to extremely high levels of radiation.
Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. (TEPCO) said the robot was sent into the damaged reactor to gather information about highly radioactive residue from melted fuel inside the reactor.
...
Before the technical failure, TEPCO said the robot sent back data that reveled the level of radiation in the air three meters from the entrance to the pressure vessel was at a lethal 210 sieverts per hour.
...
TEPCO gave up trying to retrieve the robot and opted to cut its remote control cables, officials said.
Link.
Robot stuck in Fukushima No. 2 reactor on 1st try, abandoned
According to the utility, the robot entered the containment vessel around 8 a.m. It traveled along a 7.2-meter-long rail connecting the outer wall of the containment vessel with its central portion immediately beneath the pressure vessel.
But about 5 meters into its mission, the robot’s controls started to become less responsive. TEPCO believes it was due to deposits and other debris that are blocking the rail entering its drive system.
The operator tugged on the electrical cable connected to the robot and had it pull back to an area along its path with less obstacles, but it ultimately became stuck there.
...
With the robot completely immobilized, TEPCO gave up on retrieving it around 3 p.m. The operator cut the electric cable and closed the tunnel bored into the wall of the containment vessel, entombing the robot inside.
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: loam
I seriously feel like a panic attack creeping up with the latest news from there.
Thanks for sharing, a half-mast black flag and a star for you.
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
Someone on here mentioned mining under the melted fuel, you know, it's not such a bad idea. Drill to a few feet under the reactor and meltdown, Run in a remote controlled specially converted dumper truck and catch the crap when it eventually melts through. Run the truck out, contain the crap and bobs your uncle.
No doubt someone will come along and explain why this is a no goer.
originally posted by: Reverbs
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
Someone on here mentioned mining under the melted fuel, you know, it's not such a bad idea. Drill to a few feet under the reactor and meltdown, Run in a remote controlled specially converted dumper truck and catch the crap when it eventually melts through. Run the truck out, contain the crap and bobs your uncle.
No doubt someone will come along and explain why this is a no goer.
first of all.. Where do you think sea level is?
That's probably your first and impossible obstacle.
look at pictures of the plant.
It's right on the "beach"
originally posted by: NobodiesNormal
a reply to: Soloprotocol
and then what? you have any idea how radioactive this stuff is? it will melt right through the truck, it would fry the systems that keep the truck running, ..
The idea of digging a tunnel under the reactor has some merit and it's something they actually did in Chernobyl.
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
originally posted by: NobodiesNormal
a reply to: Soloprotocol
and then what? you have any idea how radioactive this stuff is? it will melt right through the truck, it would fry the systems that keep the truck running, ..
I said..A specially converted truck, I also said that the truck could be a collection vehicle on rails that drags that crap out by external means...ie, rail track and tow cables. If they can get under the reactor i could draw up the plans in minutes...
Lets here your plans to attempt to fix this.?
here..
It was first necessary to build a cooling slab under the reactor to prevent the hot nuclear fuel from burning through the foundations. Four hundred coal miners were called upon to dig the required tunnel below the reactor and by June 24 the necessary 168 metre long tunnel was in place.
According to Reuters the Onagawa nuclear power plant was the closest nuclear power plant to the March 2011 earthquake epicenter. All three reactors at the power plant successfully withstood the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami, demonstrating the ability of a well designed nuclear facility to withstand even one of the most powerful of megathrust earthquakes and tsunamis ever recorded and to shut down safely, as designed, without incident.
As the Onagawa plant shows, it's not impossible to build a safe facility, but there will always be some penny-pinching accountant trying to save a small coin who ends up causing the disaster, or inadequately trained personnel like in three mile island and Chernobyl who if they didn't make stupid mistakes and just let the installed safety equipment operate normally those disasters would have never happened.
originally posted by: NobodiesNormal
lets all take a moment to reflect on how much effort the nuclear industry put into convincing the public that nuclear energy is so much safer then burning oil or coal.....
So they will work for 3 nanoseconds after opening the shielding?
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
Of course they would have to be designed with shielding until ready to interact with the mass and then open and deliver their payload...
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
originally posted by: NobodiesNormal
a reply to: Soloprotocol
and then what? you have any idea how radioactive this stuff is? it will melt right through the truck, it would fry the systems that keep the truck running, ..
I said..A specially converted truck, I also said that the truck could be a collection vehicle on rails that drags that crap out by external means...ie, rail track and tow cables. If they can get under the reactor i could draw up the plans in minutes...
Lets here your plans to attempt to fix this.?
originally posted by: NobodiesNormal
a reply to: Soloprotocol
lets say hypothetically you get a magical truck that could withstand this stuff. it drives out of the tunnel then what? now this stuff is even more exposed to the atmosphere and the surrounding country, where you gonna take it? maybe find an active volcano on an uninhabited island to dump it into? bury it somewhere else? seems no matter what you do its just gonna do the same thing and find a way to burrow down through the planet.
lets all take a moment to reflect on how much effort the nuclear industry put into convincing the public that nuclear energy is so much safer then burning oil or coal.....